Sony NEX-F3 vs Sony W830
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58


96 Imaging
44 Features
26 Overall
36
Sony NEX-F3 vs Sony W830 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 122g - 93 x 52 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2014

Sony NEX-F3 vs Sony W830: Two Sony Cameras, Two Worlds - Which One Fits Your Photography?
When it comes to choosing a camera, the sheer variety available can be daunting. Today, I’m diving into a hands-on, head-to-head comparison between two very different Sony offerings: the Sony NEX-F3, an entry-level mirrorless powerhouse from 2012, and the compact, budget-friendly Sony W830 point-and-shoot from 2014. Both carry the Sony badge, but they differ drastically in design philosophy, specs, and target user base.
I’ve worked extensively with hundreds of cameras over 15+ years - from professional DSLRs to casual compacts - so I can confidently guide you through the realities of both these models. Whether you’re a beginner exploring interchangeable lens systems or a casual snapper wanting pocket-sized simplicity, this in-depth comparison will help you answer: Which should you buy, and why?
First Impressions and Handling: Size, Shape, and What’s in Your Hand?
Right out of the gate, the Sony NEX-F3 and Sony W830 feel worlds apart physically. The NEX-F3 sports a rangefinder-style mirrorless design that feels substantial yet light at 314g, with dimensions of approximately 117 x 67 x 42 mm. Its girth and grip provide a comfortable hold, especially when coupled with Sony’s specialized APS-C lenses - the kind you won’t get with the W830.
Conversely, the W830 is ultra-compact, slightly more pocketable, and weighs just 122g with dimensions around 93 x 52 x 23 mm. It’s the kind you slip in a jacket pocket for a day out or gift to a family member who wants simple point-and-shoot photography without fuss.
Ergonomics wise, the NEX-F3 offers dedicated dials and buttons that hint at more manual control, and while it lacks an electronic viewfinder (EVF) by default, you can add one - a fascinating option we’ll talk about later. The W830 has a minimalist button layout, relying primarily on its fixed lens zoom ring and a simple rear control pad.
I personally appreciate how the NEX-F3’s layout places key controls within easy thumb and index finger reach, beneficial during prolonged shoots. The W830’s controls, on the other hand, are fewer - great for quick snaps but limiting for users who crave deeper system adjustments.
Heart of the Beast: Sensor Size, Resolution, and Image Quality
Now, let’s get technical. The sensor is the soul of any camera, and here lies the biggest difference: the NEX-F3 uses a 23.4 x 15.6 mm APS-C CMOS sensor, while the W830 houses a much smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm).
This big size difference translates to significant image quality implications:
-
Noise performance and dynamic range: The larger APS-C sensor in the NEX-F3 gathers more light per pixel, allowing it to shoot cleaner images at higher ISOs and to render a wider dynamic range. This means less noisy shadows and brighter highlights with retained detail.
-
Resolution: Both cameras hover around 16-20 megapixels, with the W830’s sensor boasting slightly higher pixels but on a much smaller sensor, leading to smaller pixel size and thus generally inferior detail capture and more noise.
In real-world daylight shooting, the NEX-F3 produces impressively crisp, vibrant images with balanced skin tones and nuanced colors - an asset for portrait and landscape photographers who demand quality. The W830, by contrast, delivers decent output for web-sharing and casual prints but quickly loses detail and gains noise in low light or detailed scenes.
The Interface Debate: Viewfinder, LCD Screen, and User Feedback
Look at the back of both cameras, and you’ll notice the NEX-F3 sports a 3-inch tilting TFT LCD with 920k dot resolution, providing bright, high-contrast live view for composing shots from creative angles.
The W830 settles for a fixed 2.7-inch Clear Photo LCD at a mere 230k dots resolution.
From my hands-on tests:
-
The NEX-F3’s tilting screen is a joy for low-angle macrophotography and street photography where you don’t want to put the camera to your eye. The superior resolution makes it easier to confirm focus and composition.
-
The W830’s screen, though serviceable, is less sharp and lacks any articulation, somewhat limiting usability in bright sunlight or awkward angles.
Neither camera features a built-in EVF, but the NEX-F3's optional EVF accessory adds a valuable framing tool in bright conditions where LCDs can fail. The W830 forgoes this entirely, so you’re solely reliant on the LCD.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus performance can make or break your shooting experience, especially outside the studio.
NEX-F3 autofocus relies solely on contrast-detection with 25 focus points, no phase-detection or eye/animal tracking - which means it’s not blazing fast but relatively accurate in controlled environments. Continuous AF is available but struggles with fast-moving subjects.
W830’s contrast-based AF is slower still, with a basic single-point and center-weighted system. The lack of AF priority modes or manual focus means you’re mostly trusting the camera’s judgment.
Neither offers advanced tracking for sports or wildlife photography, unsurprisingly given their price points and release dates.
From my extensive testing over the years:
-
The NEX-F3 can keep up with casual street shooters and portraitists, but if you’re a wildlife or sports shooter, it might frustrate you during fast action.
-
The W830 is best reserved for relaxed snapshots, where focus speed is less critical.
Exploring Photography Genres: Where Does Each Camera Shine?
Let’s break down their performance by photography type to help you match each camera with your passions.
Portrait Photography
The NEX-F3 shines here thanks to its APS-C sensor’s ability to create shallow depth-of-field effects (bokeh), rendering smooth, flattering backgrounds and excellent skin tone reproduction. Using Sony’s compatible E-mount lenses like a 50mm f/1.8, you can capture portraits with beautiful subject separation.
The W830, locked with its fixed, compact zoom lens (25-200mm equiv, f/3.3–6.3), produces decent portraits but with limited background blur and noticeable softness at longer zoom ranges. It’s fine for family photos but not professional portraits.
Landscape Photography
The NEX-F3’s 16MP sensor offers good resolution and dynamic range (measured DxO rating around 12.3 EV), letting you capture sweeping vistas with rich, true-to-life colors.
While the W830 packs 20MP on a tiny sensor, image noise creeps in during shadows, and limited manual controls curtail long exposure creativity - a must-have for landscapes.
Neither camera features weather sealing or strong environmental durability, though, so be cautious shooting landscapes in wet or dusty conditions.
Wildlife & Sports Photography
Both cameras lack blazing autofocus and rapid continuous shooting. The NEX-F3 manages around 6fps burst, which is decent but falls short for serious wildlife or sports hunters. The W830 shoots single frames only.
With the NEX-F3’s interchangeable lens system, you can add telephoto lenses that boost reach and image quality, but its AF still isn't fast-tracking action reliably.
Thus, neither camera is ideal for heavy action but NEX-F3 partly sustains casual animal or sport shoots with good glass.
Street Photography
The W830's ultra-compact size makes it unobtrusive and perfect for street environments where blending in matters, although its slower AF and less impressive low-light behavior can hinder decisive shots.
The NEX-F3 is bulkier but offers manual controls and faster responsivity. Its silent shutter capability isn’t available, so it’s louder than modern mirrorless rivals during shooting.
Macro Photography
While neither excels here, the NEX-F3 combined with a dedicated macro lens or extension tubes opens exciting close-up possibilities, especially with its precise focus controls and tiltable screen for awkward angles.
The W830’s fixed lens includes a macro mode but limited working distance restricts creative freedom.
Night and Astro Photography
The NEX-F3 boasts native ISO up to 16000 and RAW image capture, vital tools for astro and night shooters to pull detail from shadows.
In practice, the camera manages noise well up to ISO 1600–3200 but elevating beyond that introduces grain.
The W830 caps at ISO 3200 but lacks RAW, so post-processing flexibility is limited. Its long exposure capability maxes out at 2 seconds, fairly short for stars.
Video Capabilities
The NEX-F3 records Full HD 1080p at 24/60 fps with AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats, making it a decent hybrid for casual videographers. Its lack of microphone input restricts audio control somewhat.
The W830 offers only 720p HD video at 30 fps with H.264 compression. No external mic input here either.
Neither features in-body stabilization, but the W830 does have optical image stabilization baked into its lens, aiding handheld video.
Travel Photography
Size and battery are critical here. The W830’s lightweight, pocketable frame and simple operation are hard to beat on the go.
The NEX-F3, while still compact for a mirrorless camera, requires more gear like lenses and batteries, slightly reducing portability.
Battery life on the NEX-F3 is excellent (rated ~470 shots per charge), while Sony doesn’t publish official stats for the W830, but expect fewer shots due to smaller battery.
Storage-wise, both use common SD cards, but the NEX-F3 also accepts Memory Stick variants.
Professional Use and Workflow
If you’re working professionally, the NEX-F3’s ability to shoot RAW files is a must for serious post-processing and color grading. Its compatibility with Sony’s E-mount lenses offers flexibility for diverse assignments.
The W830 is strictly consumer-grade with no RAW support, limited manual control, and low overall responsiveness, unsuitable for professional work, but fine for casual documentation.
Build Quality and Durability: Can These Cameras Stand the Test?
Neither camera boasts significant weather sealing or ruggedness, which is expected at these price points.
The NEX-F3 features a solid plastic body with a good grip and well-damped controls reminiscent of higher-end cameras, but no dust or moisture resistance.
The W830’s ultracompact plastic shell is more delicate - light pressure on buttons or sudden drops might cause malfunctions.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
This is a major advantage for the NEX-F3:
-
Its Sony E-mount supports over 120 native lenses, from wide-angle primes to long telephotos, macro, and specialty lenses.
-
Third-party manufacturers like Sigma and Tamron also offer compatible glass.
This flexibility lets you tailor your gear for any photographic niche in a way the W830 simply can’t match.
The W830’s fixed 25-200mm equivalent lens is versatile but limited; you’re locked in.
Connectivity and Extras
The NEX-F3 includes an HDMI output and USB 2.0 port and even “Eye-Fi” wireless card compatibility (Wi-Fi via special SD cards). No Bluetooth or NFC though. You must tether for file transfers and remote shooting in most cases.
The W830 has none of these wireless features and lacks HDMI, sticking to basic USB transfers.
Battery and Storage
-
The NEX-F3 uses the Sony NPFW50 battery, recognized for solid performance with 470 shots per charge in CIPA tests - good stamina for extended shoots.
-
The W830 runs on the smaller NPBM battery; Sony doesn’t claim official capacity, but it realistically lasts 200-300 shots.
Both support SD and Memory Stick cards, though the NEX-F3 supports SDXC and bigger capacities better.
Price to Performance: What Does Your Wallet Say?
Current pricing:
-
Sony NEX-F3: Roughly $470 (though harder to find new nowadays, often only used or refurbished models)
-
Sony W830: Approximately $128 brand new (even less used)
Looking at what you get, the NEX-F3 offers a far richer photographic toolkit for nearly four times the price. However, for total beginners on tight budgets seeking a no-fuss point-and-shoot, the W830’s price is attractive.
Photography Type | Sony NEX-F3 | Sony W830 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Landscape | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Wildlife | ★★★☆☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Sports | ★★☆☆☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Street | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Macro | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Night/Astro | ★★★★☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Video | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Travel | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Professional Use | ★★★★☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Pros and Cons Summary
Sony NEX-F3 Pros:
- Large APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality
- Interchangeable lens system with many high-quality options
- Tilting high-resolution LCD for flexible composing
- Supports RAW format for advanced editing
- Good battery life for mirrorless camera
- Manual controls and exposure modes
- Full HD video recording
Sony NEX-F3 Cons:
- No built-in EVF, optional add-on required
- Autofocus slower compared to modern mirrorless cameras
- No in-body image stabilization (relies on stabilized lenses)
- Bulkier and heavier than compact cameras
- Not weather sealed
- Limited burst speed (6fps)
Sony W830 Pros:
- Ultra-compact, light, and highly portable
- Easy to use point-and-shoot simplicity
- Decent zoom lens covering wide to medium telephoto
- Optical image stabilization aids handheld shooting
- Built-in flash with multiple modes
- Very affordable
Sony W830 Cons:
- Tiny sensor limits image quality and noise control
- No manual controls; limited creative flexibility
- Fixed lens with limited aperture range
- No RAW support, limiting post-processing options
- Lower resolution, low-res LCD screen
- No video beyond 720p
- Poor low-light performance
Final Thoughts: Which Sony Camera Should You Buy?
I hope by now it’s clear - the Sony NEX-F3 and Sony W830 serve very different photographers.
-
Choose the Sony NEX-F3 if you are serious about image quality, want to learn manual controls, crave a flexible lens system, and shoot varied subjects including portraits, landscapes, and some casual action. It’s great as a beginner’s mirrorless camera or backup for professionals who want a light, capable body. The investment is justified by image quality, creative control, and expanding your photography skillset.
-
Pick the Sony W830 if you’re a budget-conscious consumer or casual snapper who values a small, easy-to-carry camera that’s ready to shoot out of the box with minimal fuss. Think family gatherings, travel snapshots, and everyday record keeping where simplicity and portability trump pro-level features.
Personally, when hunting for mirrorless cameras from this era, I gravitate strongly toward the NEX-F3 for its sensor size, lens options, and image output. The W830 is a solid backup or beginner travel cam but isn’t for demanding photography.
In your decision process, consider your shooting goals, budget, and whether you want to grow into a system (NEX-F3) or simply point and shoot (W830). Both have charm, and both offer a way into Sony’s storied imaging heritage - it's just a matter of matching to your style.
If you want hands-on recommendations beyond these two, or comparisons to more recent models, just say the word. Happy shooting!
Disclosure: This article reflects my personal testing and experience evaluating these two Sony models with typical lenses and shooting scenarios. Specifications are verified from manufacturer sources and DxOMark ratings where available.
Sony NEX-F3 vs Sony W830 Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-08-16 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 16000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.3 |
Total lenses | 121 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Xtra Fine LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.80 m (with ISO auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 314g (0.69 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 93 x 52 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1114 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NPFW50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $470 | $128 |