Clicky

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000

Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57
Sony Alpha QX1 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2014
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Sony QX1 versus Sony S2000, former is a Lens-style while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the QX1 (20MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the QX1 (APS-C) and S2000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The QX1 was introduced 4 years after the S2000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the QX1 grades against the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sony S2000

 QX1 S2000 
IntroducedSeptember 2014January 2010More modern by 57 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sony QX1

 S2000 QX1 
Display sizing3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution230k0kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Sony QX1 and Sony S2000

 QX1 S2000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Sony QX1 has external dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Sony QX1 versus Sony S2000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the QX1 against the S2000.

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the QX1 and S2000 is 90 and 93 respectively.

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the QX1 and S2000.

All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The QX1 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony QX1 will provide you with more detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher QX1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony QX1 Portrait photography information
Sony S2000 Portrait photography information
66
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Sony QX1 Street photography features
Sony S2000 Street photography features
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (216g)
46
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sony QX1 as a Sports photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Sports photography camera
56
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good battery life (440 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,200 seconds)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Sony QX1 Travel photography highlights
Sony S2000 Travel photography highlights
71
good battery life (440 CIPA)
comes with focus via touch
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (216 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Sony QX1 Landscape photography information
Sony S2000 Landscape photography information
64
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (440 CIPA)
screen is small ( inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse mode
27
screen is a good size (3 inch)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Sony QX1 as a Vlogging camera
Sony S2000 as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen
supports face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competition (216g)
21
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic support
Photography Glossary

Sony QX1 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony QX1 and Sony S2000
 Sony Alpha QX1Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Make Sony Sony
Model Sony Alpha QX1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Category Lens-style Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2014-09-03 2010-01-07
Physical type Lens-style Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Bionz X Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.2 x 15.4mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 357.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5456 x 3632 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 16000 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Sony E fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Max aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal - 3"
Resolution of display 0k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 1s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash modes Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 216 grams (0.48 lbs) 167 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 440 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-FW50 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2, 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $500 $225