Sony HX90V vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51


96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Sony HX90V vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed August 2009

Sony HX90V vs Sony TX1: In-Depth Comparison of Two Compact Cameras for Modern Photographers
Choosing the right camera for your photography needs often involves balancing cutting-edge features with practical usability and reliability. Today, we examine two distinct Sony Cyber-shot compact models, the Sony HX90V, a 2015-era small sensor superzoom, and the older Sony TX1, a 2009 ultracompact option. While both deliver pocket-friendly form factors, each targets significantly different use cases and user expectations. This detailed comparison draws on extensive hands-on testing and technical knowledge to unpack how these cameras perform in real-world scenarios across photography types, image quality, ergonomics, and value, with an eye for the enthusiast and professional market.
First Impressions and Physical Design: Compactness Meets Usability
Understanding how a camera feels in your hands is paramount, particularly for street, travel, and casual photography where portability and ease of use dictate shooting enjoyment.
Size and Ergonomics: Superzoom Bulk or Ultracompact Convenience?
Beginning with body dimensions and weight - the HX90V measures 102x58x36 mm and weighs 245 grams, while the TX1 slims down to 94x58x17 mm at just 142 grams. The HX90V is notably thicker and heavier due primarily to its extensive zoom range and internal hardware. The TX1’s ultracompact design makes it a prime candidate for minimalists and purse photographers who prioritize pocketability.
Despite the greater heft, the HX90V maintains a comfortable grip with a sculpted front grip and well-placed buttons, facilitating one-handed operation without resorting to an external grip. The TX1, conversely, is closer to classic point-and-shoot dimensions, with limited physical controls and less tactile engagement, which can be restrictive for users wanting manual control or rapid setting changes.
Control Layout and Interface
The HX90V benefits from a thoughtfully arranged top and rear button cluster, including dedicated exposure mode dials offering manual, aperture priority, shutter priority, and program modes. The TX1, meanwhile, sacrifices the dials to maintain its slenderness, offering only automatic settings and minimal exposure compensation.
Sony’s tactile implementation on the HX90V enables quicker access to critical functions, including ISO adjustments, flash modes, and custom button assignments - a boon for enthusiasts who require speed under pressure. In contrast, the TX1’s user interface relies heavily on menu navigation through touchscreen input, which is somewhat sluggish given its dated processor and smaller, low-resolution 230k-dot screen.
Sensor and Image Quality: Balancing Resolution, ISO Performance, and Sensor Size
Image quality remains the cornerstone of any camera comparison. Despite both featuring relatively small 1/2.3-inch class sensors, the two cameras differ significantly in resolution, sensor tech, and resultant image output.
Sensor Specifications and Performance Insights
- Sony HX90V: 18MP BSI-CMOS sensor with 28.07mm² sensor area, 4896x3672 max resolution, ISO 80–12,800, featuring Sony’s Bionz X processor.
- Sony TX1: 10MP BSI-CMOS sensor, 27.94mm² sensor area, 3648x2736 max resolution, ISO 125–3200, with original Bionz processor.
The HX90V's higher resolution allows for significantly more detail retention, especially relevant for landscape and portrait shooters who desire large prints or cropping flexibility. Moreover, the newer BSI (Backside Illuminated) CMOS sensor architecture yields improved light-gathering capabilities and better noise handling at higher ISOs, where the TX1's sensor struggles notably.
Low-light ISO performance is an area where the TX1 is markedly limited. Its maximum native ISO is 3200, whereas the HX90V extends up to ISO 12,800. While the latter’s smaller sensor size still puts it behind APS-C or full-frame rivals regarding noise floor, the HX90V demonstrates impressive noise reduction algorithms, making it usable up to ISO 3200 for critical work on moderate-sized outputs.
Autofocus and Shooting Dynamics: Speed, Accuracy, and Versatility
Effective autofocus (AF) systems differentiate cameras beyond pure specs, influencing how easily and confidently a photographer can capture sharp images.
Autofocus Technology and Real-World Responsiveness
The HX90V utilizes contrast-detection AF exclusively with continuous, single, and tracking modes, face detection, and multiple AF areas, including center, multi, and selective focus points. Despite lacking phase-detection AF, it performs admirably with fast, accurate focusing in good light conditions, thanks to Bionz X processing and Sony's AF algorithms.
The TX1, debuted in 2009, offers a fixed 9-point AF system with contrast detection but lacks face detection or AF tracking, limiting its utility in dynamic or portrait settings.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds
- HX90V supports up to 10 fps continuous shooting, beneficial for wildlife or sports enthusiasts capturing fleeting action.
- TX1 offers no continuous shooting mode - a significant limitation for action photography.
Shutter speed ranges on the HX90V extend to 1/2000s maximum, adequate for daylight action shots, versus the TX1’s max 1/1250s shutter speed.
Display and Viewfinder: Visibility in Varied Conditions
Visual framing tools significantly impact composition confidence, especially outdoors.
Rear Screen Evolution
The HX90V boasts a 3.0-inch tilting LCD with 921k-dot resolution, enhancing compositional flexibility and visibility in bright environments and awkward angles - ideal for street or travel photography.
Conversely, the TX1's fixed 3.0-inch LCD is severely limited with only 230k-dot resolution, often frustrating users under sunlight glare and lacking tilt/swivel capability.
Electronic Viewfinder vs No Viewfinder
The HX90V includes a 0.5x magnification electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 638k-dot resolution covering 100% frame, a significant advantage for precise framing, especially in bright outdoor light. The TX1 lacks any viewfinder, relying solely on rear LCD for composition.
Lens and Zoom Flexibility: Reach, Aperture, and Optical Quality
A key distinction between these cameras lies in their optical zoom systems, directly impacting versatility across genres.
Focal Length and Aperture Range
- HX90V utilizes a 24-720mm (30x zoom) fixed lens with F3.5-6.4 aperture.
- TX1 features a 35-140mm (4x zoom) fixed lens with F3.5-4.6 aperture.
The HX90V's superzoom breadth offers extraordinary reach, catering to wildlife and sports photographers needing distant framing without telephoto lens attachments. However, this comes at narrower maximum apertures in the telephoto range, limiting low-light and shallow DOF potential.
The TX1’s shorter zoom, in exchange, has brighter apertures at telephoto, aiding handheld shots in moderate light but fails to provide flexibility for wildlife or distant landscapes.
Macro Capability and Minimum Focus Distance
The HX90V excels with a macro minimum focus distance of 5cm, enabling tighter close-ups with better detail, while the TX1 is limited to 8cm, which can constrain macro creativity.
Photography Type Performance: Versatility Across Genres
Assessing which camera fits your discipline or general needs requires testing across portrait, landscape, wildlife, street, and more.
Portrait Photography
The HX90V outperforms with face detection AF, precise eye detection tracking (though animal eye AF is absent), and the ability to manually select aperture and focus modes, enabling richer skin tones and background separation. Despite the small sensor, its telephoto reach helps compress facial features subtly for flattering portraits.
The TX1's lack of face detection and limited control options makes portrait shooting more hit-or-miss, particularly in complex lighting or subject motion.
Landscape Photography
With an 18MP sensor and greater dynamic range courtesy of updated BSI-CMOS tech, plus raw support absent in TX1, the HX90V serves landscapes better. The tilting screen and EVF also aid composition in varying light angles. The TX1’s lower resolution and dynamic range constrain fine detail capture, making it less desirable for landscape specialists.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
While neither can match dedicated DSLR or mirrorless high-speed sports cameras, the HX90V's 10 fps burst and 720mm zoom edge out the TX1’s capabilities by a wide margin. AF tracking complements this, though limited contrast AF means fast-moving subjects at distance sometimes elude precision.
The TX1’s limited AF and no burst shooting hinder its usefulness for wildlife or sports.
Street Photography
The TX1’s ultracompact and discreet profile is its greatest asset here, allowing for candid shooting with minimal intrusion, excellent for enthusiasts prioritizing portability. The HX90V is bulkier but compensated by faster AF, tilting screen, and EVF - valuable when lighting conditions vary or framing is complex.
Macro Photography
HX90V’s 5cm minimum macro distance and optical image stabilization (OIS) enable handheld close-ups with less blur - a significant advantage over the TX1, which has a larger minimum focus distance and less stabilization sophistication.
Night and Astro Photography
Both cameras, limited by small sensors, struggle with noise at very low light, but HX90V's higher max ISO, wider ISO range, and optical stabilization afford better handheld/nighttime shooting. Neither supports bulb mode or advanced astro features.
Video Capabilities: HD Quality and Stabilization
Video demands are increasingly crucial, even for stills-centric cameras.
- HX90V supports Full HD 1080p up to 60fps with AVCHD and XAVC S codecs, alongside built-in optical stabilization improving handheld video smoothness.
- TX1 caps out at 720p 30fps video with unspecified codec and standard OIS.
Neither camera offers microphone or headphone jacks limiting pro video use, but the HX90V clearly targets better video content creators with tunable frame rates and codecs suitable for further editing.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
Neither camera incorporates environmental sealing or ruggedization. They are best suited for everyday casual or enthusiast use rather than harsh weather or extreme professional conditions.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
- HX90V: Rated for 360 shots per charge, uses NP-BX1 battery, supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick Duo cards, features built-in GPS and Wi-Fi/NFC for image transfer and geotagging.
- TX1: Battery life unspecified, uses proprietary batteries without extended functionality, supports Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo and internal storage, lacks wireless connectivity or GPS.
Connectivity and battery life considerations make the HX90V far superior for travelers and casual shooters needing reliable endurance and in-field image sharing.
Value Proposition and Pricing Context
As of its 2015 release, the HX90V's price of approximately $440 (used market pricing varies) reflects its advanced features and zoom versatility, positioning it as a high-value compact superzoom.
The older TX1, at around $350 on the used market, appeals primarily as a budget ultracompact, but its outdated sensor and limited controls significantly temper its appeal for enthusiasts expecting modern image quality and expandability.
Summary: Which Camera Fits Your Vision?
Use Case / Interest | Sony HX90V: Recommendation | Sony TX1: Recommendation |
---|---|---|
Portrait Photography | Recommended: Better AF, higher resolution, face detect | Not recommended: Limited AF, lower resolution |
Landscape Photography | Strong choice: High MP, dynamic range, raw support | Limited: Lower MP, dynamic range |
Wildlife/Sports Photography | Suitable: 30x zoom, burst shooting, AF tracking | Unsuitable: No burst, limited zoom and AF |
Street Photography | Good, but bulkier body | Excellent for discretion and portability |
Macro Photography | Good: Close min focus, OIS | Limited: Further focus distance, less stabilization |
Night/Astro Photography | Moderate: Extended ISO and OIS | Poor: Limited ISO range and tech |
Video Recording | Advanced: 1080p60fps, stabilized | Basic: Only 720p30fps, less flexible |
Travel Photography | Versatile, GPS, wifi, solid battery life | Compact but outdated and connectivity-lacking |
Professional Use | Limited: No raw support, no weather sealing | Unsuitable: Very limited control and performance |
Final Verdict
While both cameras occupy the compact segment, the Sony Cyber-shot HX90V distinctly outperforms the older Sony TX1 across nearly all critical performance measures - especially sensor quality, zoom range, autofocus sophistication, and video capabilities - making it a more versatile and future-ready choice for most photography enthusiasts and prosumers. The HX90V notably shines in zoom flexibility, everyday usability with its EVF and tilting screen, and connectivity, critical for contemporary photographers.
The Sony TX1 remains a lightweight, pocketable option perfect for those prioritizing ultra portability and simple, casual use without concern for advanced photography features or output quality. However, its severely dated sensor, limited ISO range, and lack of manual control render it a suboptimal choice for photographers seeking creative control or image quality standards in today's digital environment.
Ultimately, one’s choice should hinge on intended photographic pursuits: if seeking a travel-friendly superzoom packed with features, the HX90V is a compelling pick; if mere snapshot convenience in an exceptionally slim form factor is paramount, consider the TX1 - but be mindful of its technical and compositional limitations.
By evaluating these cameras through extensive hands-on experience and technical analysis, we aim to provide clarity and trustworthiness to your next purchase decision. Selecting the right tool can profoundly impact your creative journey, and comprehensive comparisons like this help illuminate that path.
Happy shooting!
Sony HX90V vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-04-14 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz X | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.4 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 638 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, XAVC S | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 142 grams (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-BX1 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $440 | $350 |