Clicky

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33

Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 front
 
Sony SLT-A33 front
Portability
67
Imaging
54
Features
80
Overall
64

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33 Key Specs

Sony QX10
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1440 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2013
Sony A33
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Announced August 2010
  • Successor is Sony A35
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Comparing the Sony Cyber-shot QX10 and the Sony SLT-A33: A Comprehensive Lens-Style vs. Entry-Level DSLR Showdown

When Sony dropped the Cyber-shot QX10 lens-style camera back in 2013, it ignited a small but fascinating revolution - what if your smartphone’s camera could be bolstered by a standalone optical zoom lens with its own sensor, yet remain completely untethered? Fast forward a few years, and the tried-and-true Sony SLT-A33 entry-level DSLR, launched in 2010, stands as a solid reference point for anyone seeking traditional DSLR reflex shooting with a mirrorless twist thanks to its translucent mirror technology.

In this detailed comparison, I’ll walk you through my real-world results, hands-on testing, and the technical nuances of these two distinctive cameras. Whether you want to stretch your smartphone’s photographic muscle, or step into dedicated photography gear with all the manual controls - I’ll share practical insights and shooting advice, ensuring you get a candid, experience-rooted perspective.

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33 size comparison

Form Factor & Ergonomics: Lens-Style Minimalism vs. Compact DSLR Bulk

The Sony QX10 is essentially a chunky pancake lens with a sensor, designed to be mounted on or used independently from a smartphone - roughly 62mm square and a slender 33mm thick. It weighs just 105 grams. In contrast, the SLT-A33 feels like a proper camera in your hand: at 124mm wide, 92mm tall, and 85mm deep, it's noticeably larger and heavier (around 500 grams).

Holding the QX10, you’re reminded it wasn’t built for standalone use - it has no viewfinder, no dedicated screen, no physical controls, and relies entirely on your smartphone’s touchscreen and app interface for operation. Lightweight and pocketable, it’s almost an accessory rather than a camera.

The A33, on the other hand, features a robust magnesium alloy-and-plastic chassis and a traditional DSLR grip. It has physical buttons, dials, and an articulated 3-inch LCD that's sharp and detailed. The design evokes confidence and control, which is something many photographers crave.

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison

Ergonomics matter hugely for long shoots, and while the QX10 excels in portability and stealth, its lack of tactile controls and reliance on a mobile device inevitably leads to a clumsier user experience - especially if you want speed.

Sensor Technology & Image Quality: Small Sensor Compromises vs. APS-C Strength

Let’s talk about the beating heart of image quality - the sensor. The Sony QX10 houses a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55mm with 18 megapixels. The sensor is tiny, more akin to point-and-shoot formats or premium smartphones of the early 2010s.

Conversely, the SLT-A33 features a significantly larger 23.5 x 15.6mm APS-C CMOS sensor with 14 megapixels. The advantage? Much better light gathering capability, lower noise at high ISO, and generally higher image quality.

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison

In practice, the QX10’s images exhibit decent detail in good lighting but struggles in low light, showing noise creeping in from ISO 800 onwards. The small sensor results in limited dynamic range as well, so highlights can clip easily, shadows block up.

The A33, by contrast, impresses with richer color depth, wider dynamic range, and usable high-ISO performance up to ISO 1600–3200. The sensor’s physical size means photos can retain fine textures and smooth gradient transitions, critical for portrait and landscape shooters.

Autofocus Systems: How Fast and Accurate Are They?

Autofocus is often a deal-maker or breaker depending on your shooting style. The QX10 uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection, but no phase-detection technology, no continuous AF, and limited focusing area options. This means slower AF acquisition, particularly in low light or with moving subjects.

The Sony A33 inherits Sony’s Translucent Mirror Technology and an impressive 15-point phase-detection AF system with 3 cross-type points. This entry-level DSLR offers both AF-S (single) and AF-C (continuous) modes, and performs admirably for its era - especially in capturing quick-moving subjects like kids or pets.

From real shooting sessions, the A33 shines in responsiveness - locking focus swiftly and accurately, crucial for sports or wildlife images. The QX10, by comparison, feels sluggish focusing and occasionally hunts, which can lead to missed shots.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Who’s Tougher in the Field?

Neither camera boasts weather sealing or rugged environmental protections - no surprises here given their target markets and release years.

However, the A33’s build feels more robust, with a proper grip and a weather-resistant chassis capable of handling typical light outdoor use. The QX10’s plastic construction and open electronic connections make it vulnerable to moisture and dust.

For outdoor photographers who shoot in variable conditions, the A33 is the safer bet - though you’ll still want to treat it with care.

LCD Screens and Electronic Viewfinders: Navigating Your Shots

The QX10 has no built-in screen - all framing, shutter release, and menu navigation occur through your phone via Wi-Fi and a dedicated app. This can be a blessing and a curse; the large touchscreen interface is intuitive, but lag can hinder quick reflexes.

Meanwhile, the A33 sports a fully articulating 3” LCD with 921k-dot resolution, bright and accurate, making live view convenient and versatile (highly appreciated for video shooting and tricky angles). It also houses a 1,150-dot electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage giving a real-time image and exposure preview.

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

For DSLR purists or anyone shooting outdoors in bright conditions, the electronic viewfinder is a godsend - something the QX10 lacks entirely.

Lens and Focal Length Coverage: Fixed Zoom vs. Interchangeable Flexibility

The QX10 comes with a fixed 25-250mm (10x zoom equivalent) f/3.3-5.9 lens. It’s versatile on paper, covering wide to telephoto focal ranges but is fixed to this zoom. The aperture is relatively slow, meaning lower-light shooting and shallow depth of field control are limited.

Sony’s A33 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, compatible with over 140 lenses including fast primes, macro lenses, and professional telephotos, affording incredible creative freedom. The DSLR design encourages you to pair it with different optics depending on your need, whether portrait bokeh or wildlife reach.

This fundamental difference amounts to: QX10 is plug-and-play with no lens-changing fuss; A33 offers room to grow but requires investment in glass.

Continuous Shooting and Burst Performance: Catching the Decisive Moment

Burst shooting is crucial in sports or wildlife photography. The QX10 doesn’t specify continuous shooting speeds - understandably, given its smartphone-tethered operation and basic hardware.

The A33, however, offers 7 frames per second burst shooting, with full autofocus tracking - impressive for an entry-level DSLR of its generation. This makes sequences of moving subjects much easier to capture crisply.

Video Capabilities: Casual Clips vs. Semi-Professional Recording

The QX10 shoots 1440x1080 video at 30fps in MPEG-4 format. Not exactly cinema-ready, but better than your average phone shooter from 2013. There’s no external microphone input or headphone monitoring, limiting audio control.

The A33 steps up with full 1080p HD video at 60fps (also supporting AVCHD and H.264), and includes a microphone input - a welcome feature for vloggers and independent filmmakers wanting more audio fidelity.

Neither camera supports 4K or higher-framerate slow-motion modes, but the A33 gives more manual exposure control during video and cleaner color.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long and How Much?

In real-world testing, the QX10 lasted about 220 shots as per Sony’s specs - pretty modest but fair given its small battery and Wi-Fi usage. Storage is via microSD or Memory Stick Micro.

The A33 boasts better endurance, around 340 shots per charge, and features SD card slots compatible with SDHC/SDXC cards - a more professional-standard approach.

Connectivity and Wireless Features: How Do You Get Images Off the Camera?

The QX10’s claim to fame is its built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, designed to pair instantly with smartphones for live preview and image transfer. This seamless connection is handy for casual social sharing, though Wi-Fi performance was spotty in some tests, and app stability can fluctuate.

The A33 lacks modern wireless standards like Bluetooth or Wi-Fi directly, but supports Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless transfer, and has HDMI and USB 2.0 outputs for tethering. For 2010 tech, it’s reasonable, but less streamlined than a fully integrated Wi-Fi system.

Face and Eye Detection: Modern Autofocus Aids

Both cameras offer face detection autofocus, useful for portraits and selfies. The QX10 uses contrast-detection AF with face detection but no eye AF or animal eye tracking - rather basic.

The A33 leverages face detection combined with phase-detection AF for quicker focus lock and has multiple focus points to keep portraits sharp, but lacks advanced eye-detection autofocus seen in later Sony models.

Real-World Application: Portraits, Landscapes, Wildlife, and Beyond

Portrait Photography

The A33 excels with its APS-C sensor, wider lens selection, and controlled depth of field. Skin tones are natural, with good dynamic range preserving shadow and highlight detail. The articulating screen helps with framing, and face detection ensures sharp focus on your subject’s eyes.

The QX10 struggles to create shallow depth of field due to its small sensor and slow lens, resulting in flat background separation. Still, it's a handy step up from a pure smartphone for casual portraits.

Landscape Photography

Here, the larger sensor of the A33 delivers richer detail and wider tonal latitude. The flexibility to use sharp primes or wide zooms makes it the better choice. The QX10’s small sensor and limited dynamic range hamper its landscape prowess.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

The A33, with its fast continuous shooting and phase-detected autofocus, is a strong entry-level option for wildlife and sports in good light. The QX10’s slow AF and limited burst make it unsuitable for fast action.

Street Photography

Surprisingly, the QX10’s compact, lens-style form is ideal for discreet street shooting - assuming you have your phone handy. Its silence and small size make it less intrusive than an SLR.

The A33 is bulkier but offers faster focusing and better low-light IQ; there’s a trade-off between stealth and performance here.

Macro and Close-Up

Neither camera shines in macro photography without specific lenses. The QX10’s 5cm macro focus range offers casual close-ups, but limited control and image quality.

The A33 allows macro lens interchangeability, facilitating more serious macro work.

Night and Astrophotography

The A33’s APS-C sensor and higher ISO ceiling make it far superior for night scenes. The QX10’s small sensor noise kills low light detail.

Video Shooting

The A33’s HD video at 60fps and audio input makes it far better suited for semi-professional videography. The QX10 is for casual clips.

Travel Photography

The QX10’s pocketable lens-style design is perfect for travelers wanting more zoom and quality than a phone but without lugging a big camera.

The A33 carries more gear and weight but delivers higher image quality and full control.

Price-to-Performance and Who Should Buy Which

As of current pricing, the QX10 hovers around $250, and the A33 similarly close to $230 in used markets - this sets a fascinating affordability crossover.

  • Choose the Sony QX10 if: You want a lightweight, portable zoom camera that can connect to your phone, prioritizing convenience and casual shooting over manual control and ultimate image quality. Ideal for smartphone enthusiasts and travelers who want a modest optical zoom boost.

  • Choose the Sony A33 if: You desire more control, better image quality, and the flexibility of interchangeable lenses. Suitable for beginners stepping into dedicated photography, or semi-professionals who want a DSLR-style experience without breaking the bank.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Feature Sony QX10 Sony A33
Sensor Size Small (1/2.3") APS-C
Megapixels 18 MP 14 MP
Lens Fixed zoom 25-250mm Interchangeable Alpha mount
Autofocus Contrast-detect, face Phase-detect, 15 points
Viewfinder None Electronic (1150 dots)
Screen None, relies on phone 3” fully articulating LCD
Burst Rate Not specified 7 fps
Video 1440x1080@30fps 1080p@60fps, mic input
Wireless Wi-Fi, NFC Eye-Fi support, HDMI, USB
Battery Life ~220 shots ~340 shots
Weight 105 g 500 g
Price (new/used) ~$250 ~$230

Final Thoughts: Context is Everything

The Sony QX10 and SLT-A33 represent two very different philosophies from the early 2010s. The QX10’s novel lens-style design pushed boundaries, but ultimately the lack of manual control and smaller sensor put a ceiling on image quality and versatility. It’s a neat gadget that pairs well with a smartphone for casual zoomed shots and social sharing.

The A33 still holds its ground today - delivering solid speed, image quality, and usability for entry-level DSLR shooters. While lacking modern sensor tech and wireless features, it provides the core essentials that many beginning photographers crave, and a lens mount that opens possibilities.

If you’re a casual snapper who lives on the smartphone ecosystem, the QX10 adds some optical punch. But for enthusiasts or those pursuing photography seriously, the A33 or any modern APS-C interchangeable-lens camera will better fit your ambitions.

I hope this side-by-side breakdown gives you a clearer picture - literally and figuratively - and guides you to the gear that best fits your shooting style and vision. After all, a camera should amplify your creativity, not limit it. Happy shooting!

Sony QX10 vs Sony A33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony QX10 and Sony A33
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10Sony SLT-A33
General Information
Company Sony Sony
Model Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 Sony SLT-A33
Category Lens-style Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2013-09-04 2010-08-24
Physical type Lens-style Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4896 x 3672 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 25-250mm (10.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.3-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing - 3 inches
Screen resolution 0k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech Depends on connected smartphone -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 7.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options None Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1440x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105 gr (0.23 pounds) 500 gr (1.10 pounds)
Dimensions 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 591
Other
Battery life 220 photos 340 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-BN, NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2, 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $250 $230