Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800
Portability
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Portability
96 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
96 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Key Specs
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III
Sony W800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
- 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Sony RX10 IV versus Sony W800, former is a Large Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Sony. The sensor resolution of the RX10 IV (20MP) and the W800 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the RX10 IV (1") and W800 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe RX10 IV was introduced 3 years after the W800 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W800 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the RX10 IV matches up versus the W800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony RX10 IV Gallery & Sony W800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Sony W800
| RX10 IV | W800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2017 |  | February 2014 | Newer by 44 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1440k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1210k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Sony RX10 IV
| W800 | RX10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Sony RX10 IV and Sony W800
| RX10 IV | W800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sony RX10 IV has got physical measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs) while the Sony W800 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Sony RX10 IV versus Sony W800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the RX10 IV compared to the W800.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the RX10 IV and W800 is 52 and 96 respectively.
Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the RX10 IV and W800.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The RX10 IV provides the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern RX10 IV should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sony RX10 IV Portrait photography features
Sony W800 Portrait photography features
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sony RX10 IV as a Street photography camera
Sony W800 as a Street photography camera
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
exports RAW formats
has touch focus
environment sealing
heavier than competition (1,095g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sony RX10 IV Sports photography details
Sony W800 Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (24.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sony RX10 IV Travel photography info
Sony W800 Travel photography info
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
has touch focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (1,095 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
megapixel count good (20MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sony RX10 IV Landscape photography factors
Sony W800 Landscape photography factors
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
lack of Time Lapse function
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Sony RX10 IV
Vlogging with Sony W800
quite wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has external mic support
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
display is not selfie friendly
heavier than competition (1,095 grams)
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Sony RX10 IV vs Sony W800 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 |
| Class | Large Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-09-12 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Bionz X | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 315 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-600mm (25.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.4-4.0 | f/3.2-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,440 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,359 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 24.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S | AVI MPEG4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1095g (2.41 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-FW50 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $1,698 | $90 |