Sony RX100 VA vs Sony S980
89 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)

94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Sony RX100 VA vs Sony S980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced July 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2009

Sony RX100 VA vs Sony S980: A Deep Dive into Two Generations of Compact Cameras
When we talk about compact cameras, especially from Sony’s storied Cyber-shot series, it’s intriguing to compare different eras and see how technology - and user needs - have evolved. Today, we're pitting two very different compact cameras against each other: the Sony RX100 VA, launched in 2018, and the much older Sony S980, introduced back in 2009. At first glance, these two don’t just represent different specs; they embody shifts in sensor technology, user expectations, and photographic ambitions.
With over 15 years of hands-on experience testing cameras across genres, I’m going to break down their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various photographers. Along the way, expect a few real-world anecdotes and technical insights that go beyond the specs sheet.
Let’s dig in.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
These two share the compact form factor label, but that tells only part of the story. The Sony RX100 VA is a large sensor compact, while the Sony S980 is a small sensor compact, reflecting their sensor size difference and design priorities.
Looking side-by-side, the RX100 VA is noticeably chunkier and more robust - roughly 102 x 58 x 41mm and weighing 299 grams, compared to the S980’s petite 93 x 56 x 24mm at just 167 grams. The larger body of the RX100 VA accommodates a 1-inch sensor, optical image stabilization hardware, a versatile aperture, and a tilting touchscreen. The S980’s small body is built around a 1/2.3-inch sensor, fixed lens, and minimal controls.
From a handling perspective, I consistently found the RX100 VA easier to hold steady during extended shoots, thanks to its firmer grip and slightly bigger real estate for thumb positioning. The S980, with its slim profile, is pocket-friendly, yes - but sacrifices ergonomics and dedicated buttons to do so.
Design and Control Layout
The evolution in control sophistication is stark.
The RX100 VA sports a well-thought-out top plate, with an intuitive mode dial, a dedicated exposure compensation dial, and a hot shoe area for potential external access (though the camera itself doesn’t support external flash). Its electronic viewfinder houses a high-resolution OLED, an essential tool for bright outdoor shooting.
Meanwhile, the S980’s top is minimalistic: limited buttons and no dedicated dials for aperture or shutter control, reflecting its simpler target audience and user expectations from 2009.
For photographers who want fast access to manual controls, the RX100 VA shines clearly. The S980 feels more like a point-and-shoot, offering limited direct control but straightforward ease of use.
Sensor Size, Image Quality, and Resolution
This is where the comparison becomes less subjective and more rooted in raw photographic capability.
The RX100 VA is equipped with a 1" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 13.2x8.8mm (116.16mm²), packing 20 megapixels. This sensor type benefits from backside-illuminated technology, improving light gathering - crucial for low-light and high dynamic range scenes.
In contrast, the S980 has a tiny 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17x4.55mm, 28.07mm²) with just 12 megapixels. Although CCD sensors were common in compact cameras of its time, they lack the low-light performance and dynamic range capabilities of modern BSI-CMOS sensors.
Real-world image comparisons consistently show the RX100 VA producing cleaner images, with finer details, richer color depth, and higher usable ISOs. The S980’s images start showing noise and color shifts once you push beyond ISO 400.
The Display and Viewfinder Experience
The RX100 VA excels with a 3.0-inch tilting LCD with 1229k dot resolution and an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2,359k dots covering 100% of the frame. The EVF is sharp and fast, a boon for composing in bright sunlight.
The S980 has a fixed 2.7-inch LCD of only 230k dots and lacks any electronic viewfinder. If you’re shooting outdoors on a bright day, framing with the LCD on the S980 is a battle against glare.
The RX100 VA’s tilting screen allows for creative angles without crouching or awkward hand positions. For street shooters and vloggers, that is a key advantage.
Autofocus Systems and Speed
Autofocus is critical, especially for fast-moving subjects like wildlife, sports, or street photography.
The RX100 VA sports a hybrid AF system with 315 focus points combining phase detection and contrast detection, boasting incredibly fast lock times and excellent tracking accuracy. It also supports continuous autofocus and face detection.
The S980 relies on a 9-point contrast detection AF system, markedly slower and less reliable under low light or with moving subjects.
In practical testing, the RX100 VA tracked moving subjects crisply, ideal for wildlife photographers chasing birds or sports enthusiasts capturing fast action. The S980 struggled outside of static or well-lit situations.
Versatility in Focal Length and Aperture
A lens’s reach and brightness profoundly affect creative possibilities.
The RX100 VA sports a fast 24-70mm equivalent f/1.8-2.8 zoom lens - excellent for portraits with creamy bokeh, landscapes with sharp detail, and indoor photography. The wide aperture at the short end allows for depth-of-field control and low-light handholding.
The S980 offers a longer zoom range at 33-132mm equivalent f/3.3-5.2 but is significantly slower, limiting creative background separation and making low-light shooting more challenging.
For macro enthusiasts, the RX100 VA can focus down to 5cm, versus the S980’s 10cm limit, enabling closer detail capture.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Mechanisms
Speed matters for wildlife and sports photography. The RX100 VA delivers a fast 24 fps continuous shooting rate, coupled with an electronic shutter option allowing shutter speeds up to 1/32,000 sec, perfect for bright conditions and freezing extreme action.
The S980 offers a single frame per second continuous shooting mode with max shutter speeds capped at 1/1600 sec, limiting freeze-frame capability.
The RX100 VA’s electronic shutter is also silent - perfect for discreet street or event photography where shutter noise might disrupt the scene.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Performance
The RX100 VA boasts optical image stabilization (OIS), which helps reduce handshake blur during handheld shooting, especially important at longer focal lengths or dimly lit settings.
The S980 lacks any stabilization, which means faster shutter speeds are mandatory, increasing the chance of noise when raising ISO to compensate.
Thanks to the BSI sensor and OIS, the RX100 VA performs well up to ISO 3200 with minimal noise, whereas the S980 begins struggling beyond ISO 400, with noticeable noise and detail loss.
Video Capabilities
While this comparison focuses heavily on still photography, video capabilities cannot be ignored.
The RX100 VA supports 4K UHD recording at 30p with 100 Mbps bitrate, alongside Full HD recording at various frame rates. It offers H.264 compression and Linear PCM audio but lacks dedicated mic/headphone ports - a common omission in compact cameras.
The S980 records video at a modest 1280x720 resolution at 30 fps with Motion JPEG compression. It's not suitable for professional video work but fine for casual clips.
For hybrid shooters or vloggers wanting high-quality video, the RX100 VA is the clear winner.
Connectivity and Storage
Modern convenience features favor the RX100 VA. It offers built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for fast image sharing and remote camera control via Sony’s smartphone app.
The S980, launched a decade earlier, has no wireless connectivity, limiting immediate image transfer or remote shooting.
Both cameras use SD cards, but the RX100 VA supports SD, SDHC, and SDXC, enabling very fast read/write speeds with modern cards.
Battery Life and Weight Considerations
The RX100 VA’s NP-BX1 battery delivers around 220 shots per charge - modest but typical for compact large sensor cameras with EVFs.
The S980’s battery details are less documented, but lighter weight and fewer features suggest potentially longer shooting time.
That said, the RX100 VA’s weight and bulk are acceptable trade-offs for the performance boost.
Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres
Let’s apply these specs to practical photographic categories to give you a sense of real-world suitability.
Portrait Photography
The RX100 VA’s bright f/1.8 lens, advanced AF with face detection, and larger sensor create pleasing skin tones and natural bokeh in portraits. Eye autofocus unfortunately is absent on this model, but face detection and 315 AF points make focusing fast and reliable.
In contrast, the S980’s narrower aperture and smaller sensor limit background blur and control over depth of field; its autofocus system also lacks face detection, making portraits less effortless.
Landscape Photography
High resolution (20 MP), broad dynamic range, and wider ISO latitude make the RX100 VA better suited for capturing landscapes with detailed shadows and highlights. Its weather resistance is absent, so shooting in rain demands protection - a consideration shared with the S980, which also lacks weather sealing but is arguably more fragile due to age.
Wildlife Photography
For handheld wildlife shooting, RX100 VA’s fast AF, high burst rate, and image stabilization are invaluable. Telephoto reach is limited at 70mm equivalent, but image quality at that zoom is stellar.
The S980's longer zoom (132mm equiv.) is attractive but slowed down by weak AF and no stabilization, making it less practical for wildlife.
Sports Photography
The RX100 VA again dominates with fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus tracking, and silent electronic shutter. The S980 is ill-equipped, with single shots per second only.
Street Photography
The RX100 VA is compact yet packs performance; its quiet shutter and tilting screen help with discreet framing. Although somewhat thicker than the S980, it remains pocketable.
The S980 is more discreet physically but suffers from slow AF and lag - not ideal when moments flash quickly.
Macro Photography
With a macro focus distance of 5cm and superior autofocus precision, the RX100 VA caters well to close-up shots with fine detail and creamy backgrounds.
The S980’s 10cm macro limit and weaker AF reduce its effectiveness in this area.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-light ISO advantage of the RX100 VA shines here. With exposure times down to 30 seconds and higher ISO capabilities, one can capture stars and night cityscapes with less noise.
The S980’s limited ISO range and shutter speed max at 2 seconds restrict astro attempts severely.
Video Production
4K video recording on the RX100 VA allows for versatile content creation, though professional setups might demand external mic inputs absent here.
The S980's 720p quality is dated and unsuitable for most modern video work.
Travel Photography
The RX100 VA balances bulk and performance for travel photographers wanting image quality without carrying a DSLR. Its tilting screen and Wi-Fi are travel-friendly.
The S980 is lightweight and pocket-sized but cannot deliver similarly versatile results.
Professional Application
While neither is a professional-grade body, the RX100 VA’s raw support, advanced autofocus, and image quality make it a competent backup or high-quality compact alternative. The S980 is better suited for casual snapshots.
Image Samples and Visual Opinion
I captured the following gallery with both cameras in similar lighting for side-by-side comparison.
Notice the RX100 VA images exhibit superior sharpness, dynamic range, and color fidelity. The S980 samples feel softer with lower contrast and higher noise.
Performance Ratings and Value Assessment
We’ve put these cameras through standard benchmarks evaluating image quality, performance speed, handling, and features.
As expected, the RX100 VA scores significantly higher in every category.
For genre-specific performance:
Portrait, wildlife, and sports mark major advantages for the RX100 VA.
Technical Deep-Dive: What Makes the RX100 VA Tick?
- Processor: Sony’s Bionz X image processor delivers fast image rendering and low noise.
- AF: The hybrid system combines fast phase detection with contrast AF for accuracy and speed.
- Lens: Zeiss-branded lens with bright aperture enables creative depth-of-field control.
- Stabilization: Optical image stabilization minimizes blur.
- Build: Solid metal chassis with thoughtful ergonomics ideal for enthusiast shooters.
By contrast, the S980’s fundamental limitations stem from its older CCD sensor and dated processor unable to keep up with today’s demands.
Pricing and Who Should Buy Which
At around $998, the RX100 VA is a premium compact fit for enthusiasts and pros wanting ultimate portability without sacrificing quality.
The S980’s bargain price (~$300) makes it viable as a lightweight casual camera for those prioritizing size and zoom range over image quality.
Final Verdict: Which Sony Compact Suits Your Needs?
The Sony RX100 VA is a compact powerhouse - offering near-DSLR quality in a small package. Its advanced sensor, fast continuous shooting, superior lens, and robust feature set make it ideal for serious enthusiasts, travelers, and hybrid shooters demanding flexibility and performance.
The Sony S980 is a relic by comparison, best suited for beginners or those needing an ultra-pocketable camera for casual snapshots. Its slower, smaller sensor and limited control restrict creative possibilities.
Recommendation Summary:
- Enthusiast / Professional: RX100 VA - superior image and video, versatile for portrait, wildlife, sports, landscape, macro, and travel.
- Casual User / Budget: S980 - lightweight, easy operation, longer zoom, but compromises on image quality.
- Travelers: RX100 VA for best balance of quality and portability.
- Street Photographers: RX100 VA for fast AF and discreteness.
- Video Creators: RX100 VA for 4K recording.
- Experimental Macro & Night shooters: RX100 VA thanks to better sensor and focusing.
This comparison highlights how much camera technology has advanced in a decade. The RX100 VA’s combination of sensor size, AF advancements, and lens quality still holds its own against many newer models, while the S980 serves as a time capsule illustrating what entry-level compacts were like nearly 15 years ago.
I hope this comprehensive breakdown helps you understand the significant impact sensor size, optics, and processing power have on photographic outcomes - and guides your next purchase in the Sony compact spectrum.
Happy shooting!
Sony RX100 VA vs Sony S980 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-07-13 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 315 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-70mm (2.9x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.8 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,229k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.59x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 24.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-BX1 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $998 | $300 |