Sony T900 vs Sony A99
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
57 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Launched December 2012
- Old Model is Sony A900
- Replacement is Sony A99 II
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Sony T900 and Sony A99, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR and they are both designed by Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and A99 (24MP) and the T900 (1/2.3") and A99 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T900 was introduced 4 years earlier than the A99 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the T900 grades vs the A99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 and Sony SLT-A99. The whole galleries are provided at Sony T900 Gallery and Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony A99
T900 | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Sony T900
A99 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | February 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 922k | Sharper display (+307k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony A99
T900 | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Sony T900 comes with exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony A99 has dimensions of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony T900 and Sony A99 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the T900 and the A99.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the T900 and A99 is 96 and 57 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the T900 and A99.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The T900 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A99 will give more detail using its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged T900 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony T900 vs Sony A99 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A99 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2012-12-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 19 |
Cross type focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 143 grams (0.32 lb) | 812 grams (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 89 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1555 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Retail price | $300 | $1,998 |