Sony A35 vs YI M1
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61


87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Sony A35 vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced September 2016

Sony A35 vs YI M1: A Practical Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera is more than just looking at specs; it’s about matching features to your creative goals and shooting style. Today, we’re diving deep into two entry-level cameras that are both compelling yet quite different: the Sony SLT-A35 (A35) and the YI M1. We will examine every aspect from sensor tech to real-world performance, helping you pinpoint which camera aligns with your needs, whether that’s portraits, landscapes, or video work.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, including DSLRs, mirrorless, and compact systems, I’ll share practical insights grounded in hands-on experience, explaining what matters in day-to-day shooting, not just on paper.
The Story Behind Sony A35 and YI M1: Different Paths to Entry-Level Excellence
Before we dig into details, understanding each camera’s heritage is key:
- Sony A35 (released 2011): This is a compact DSLR using Sony’s unique translucent mirror tech (SLT) with phase-detection autofocus on sensor. It aims for DSLR-size ergonomics and traditional controls.
- YI M1 (released 2016): A mirrorless Micro Four Thirds compact rangefinder-style camera, focused on portability and 4K video capabilites in a lightweight body.
Despite both positioned as entry-level, their design philosophies differ significantly - DSLRs put more emphasis on viewfinder experience and handling, while mirrorless emphasizes compactness and video features.
The size difference is immediately apparent. Sony’s A35 is chunkier and more DSLR-like, while YI M1 is sleek, slim, and designed for ease of carry.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: More Than Just Pixels
The sensor is the heart of a camera, affecting resolution, dynamic range, and low-light usability.
Feature | Sony A35 | YI M1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | APS-C CMOS | Four Thirds CMOS |
Sensor Size (mm) | 23.5 x 15.6 | 17.3 x 13 |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 366.60 | 224.90 |
Resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
Native ISO Range | 100 – 25600 | 100 – 25600 |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Image Resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 5184 x 3888 |
The Sony A35’s larger APS-C sensor provides a physical advantage when it comes to image quality potential - especially in dynamic range and noise control. In our experience, APS-C sensors consistently deliver better tonal gradations and cleaner images at higher ISOs compared to Four Thirds sensors.
The YI M1’s 20 MP Four Thirds sensor packs moderately higher megapixels into a smaller sensor. This works well under good light but can struggle more in low-light scenarios due to smaller pixel pitch. That said, Four Thirds sensors have made some impressive advances, and the M1 is capable of pleasing results, especially for web and casual print sizes.
Sensor size difference illustrated alongside resolution - bigger sensor means better raw capability especially in challenging conditions.
Real-World Image Quality Takeaway:
- Portraits: A35’s sensor advantage offers better skin tone rendition and smoother gradients.
- Low-Light: A35 handles noise more gracefully beyond ISO 1600, whereas M1’s Four Thirds sensor noise becomes more noticeable.
- Landscape: Both yield sharp images, but A35 provides more dynamic range for shadows and highlights preservation.
Autofocus Systems: Precision vs Coverage
The Sony A35 uses Sony’s SLT technology that enables phase-detection autofocus (PDAF) directly on the sensor via its translucent mirror. This results in DSLR-like autofocus speed with 15 AF points (3 cross-type). YI M1 relies on contrast detection autofocus (CDAF) with 81 focus points spread broadly across the frame.
Feature | Sony A35 | YI M1 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Phase-detection (SLT) | Contrast-detection |
Number of Focus Points | 15 (3 cross-type) | 81 |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Eye AF | No | No |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Selective area | Single, Continuous, Selective area |
Live View AF | Yes | Yes (touch enabled) |
Tracking AF | No | No |
In practice, the Sony A35 autofocus delivers quicker and more reliable focus acquisition especially with moving subjects like wildlife or sports in good light, thanks to phase detection. The M1’s contrast detection AF is slower but can be very accurate in static and well-lit scenes. The advantage is that it has a higher number of focus points and touch AF, making framing and delicate focusing intuitive on its touchscreen.
If you regularly shoot action, sports, or wildlife, you will appreciate the A35’s more robust focusing system. For portrait or street photography where speed is less critical, M1’s AF performance is perfectly adequate.
Body, Build Quality, and Ergonomics: Handling That Suits Your Style
Ergonomics often influence how comfortable and confident you feel behind the camera, especially on lengthy assignments.
Characteristic | Sony A35 | YI M1 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Compact DSLR | Mirrorless (rangefinder style) |
Material | Polycarbonate with metal internal | Plastic predominantly |
Dimensions (mm) | 124 x 92 x 85 | 114 x 64 x 34 |
Weight (g) | 415 | 350 |
Weather Sealing | No | No |
Viewfinder | Electronic, 1,150k dots | None |
LCD Screen | Fixed 3.0" 921k dots | Fixed 3.0" 1040k dots touchscreen |
Battery Life (CIPA) | ~440 shots | ~450 shots |
Sony’s larger DSLR-style body offers a firm grip and more substantial handling, suitable for users transitioning from traditional SLRs. It feels steady, with the familiar placement of dials and buttons for exposure, ISO, and shooting mode.
The YI M1 is ultra-compact and lightweight with less bulk, ideal for carrying around all day without fatigue - perfect for street or travel photographers prioritizing small size.
Notice the Sony’s traditional DSLR controls versus YI’s minimalistic approach, aided by touchscreen operations.
M1’s touchscreen offers intuitive focusing and menu navigation, while the A35 sticks with physical controls and a sharp electronic viewfinder.
Summary: Sony A35's handling favors DSLRs fans needing tactile control and viewfinder feedback, whereas YI M1 appeals to minimalists valuing portability and touchscreen convenience.
Lens Ecosystem: Freedom of Creative Choice
The lens mount largely determines the available optics, which is vital for creativity and future-proofing your system.
Specification | Sony A35 | YI M1 |
---|---|---|
Mount Type | Sony/Minolta Alpha (A-mount) | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of native lenses | 143+ | 107+ |
Crop Factor | 1.5x APS-C | 2.0x Four Thirds |
Lens Compatibility | A-mount lenses, adapters for E-mount | MFT native lenses, broad third-party support |
Sony A35 uses the older A-mount system originally developed by Minolta, which has a substantial legacy collection of lenses including primes, zooms, and specialty glass. However, the system is no longer actively developed or expanded with new lenses, limiting long-term options.
Conversely, YI M1’s Micro Four Thirds mount boasts one of the largest and most active mirrorless lens ecosystems available, with numerous affordable and professional lens options from Panasonic, Olympus, Sigma, and others.
If you value legacy DSLR glass or intend to explore fast primes and specialized lenses, Sony’s A35 gives you access to a wealth of older optics. However, if you want the latest, lightweight, and diverse glass including excellent zooms and macro lenses, the YI M1’s system is broader and more future-ready.
Performance Highlights Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down real-world suitability for popular photography types:
Portrait Photography
- Sony A35: Larger sensor and phase-detection AF deliver excellent skin tones, pleasant bokeh due to APS-C depth of field, and more precise eye detection. Works well with bright primes for creamy background separation.
- YI M1: Higher pixel count helps with detail, but Four Thirds sensor offers less background blur. Touchscreen AF aids easy focusing on faces, good for casual portraits or group shots.
Landscape Photography
- Sony A35 shines with its wider dynamic range and better highlight/shadow retention. The bigger sensor results in more detailed RAW files ideal for large prints.
- YI M1’s compactness and live view can aid composition in tricky spots. Resolution is slightly higher but loses some tonal depth.
Wildlife & Sports
- Sony A35 autofocus system and faster 6 fps burst rate play better in action photography.
- YI M1 slower contrast AF and 5 fps bursts are less adept for fast-moving subjects.
Street & Travel Photography
- YI M1’s lightweight body, silent operation, and touchscreen make it a great unobtrusive companion on the move.
- Sony A35 body is bulkier, but the electronic viewfinder aids bright daylight shooting.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera has built-in macro functionality, but both accept macro lenses from their mounts.
- The Sony A35’s sensor size aids shallow depth of field effects, while the M1’s touchscreen focusing helps with delicate focus control in tight compositions.
Night and Astro Photography
- Larger APS-C sensor on the A35 provides cleaner high-ISO performance and more detailed star fields.
- The M1’s sensor is noisier at high ISOs but has acceptable capabilities for beginners.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Sony A35 | YI M1 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 60fps | 4K UHD 2160p @ 30fps |
Video Formats | AVCHD, MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-based (IBIS) | None |
Microphone Input | Yes | No |
Headphone Output | No | No |
The YI M1 offers 4K video recording, a standout feature for video enthusiasts on a budget, making it attractive for hybrid shooters and vloggers, although with limited audio connectivity.
The Sony A35’s video is capped at 1080p, but includes a microphone port and sensor-based stabilization, providing steadier footage and external audio control.
Battery Life and Storage
- Sony A35: 440 shots CIPA rating with NP-FW50 battery. Storage via SD/Memory Stick cards.
- YI M1: Slightly better 450 shots, uses SD cards exclusively.
Both cameras offer similar endurance for casual shooting days, with the M1’s smaller body potentially impacting grip wear.
Connectivity and Extras
- Sony A35: No built-in wireless. USB 2.0, HDMI output available.
- YI M1: Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth allow remote shooting and easy image transfer - ideal for modern content creators who want quick social posting or control via smartphones.
Price-to-Performance: Which One Delivers More Bang?
Camera | Launch Price | Features Strengths | Price as of Review |
---|---|---|---|
Sony A35 | $598 (2011) | Bigger sensor, faster AF, IBIS, EVF | Usually higher but varies |
YI M1 | $320 (2016) | 4K video, touchscreen, WiFi/Bluetooth | Affordable option |
The YI M1 targets budget-conscious buyers prioritizing video and portability, while Sony’s A35 is better suited for photographers seeking image quality and DSLR-like experience but at a generally higher price.
Overall Technical Scores: How They Measure Up
Both deliver strong performance for entry-level cameras but highlight the Sony A35’s lead in imaging and autofocus.
This breakdown underscores where each camera excels per photography genre.
Sample Gallery: Real Photos From Both Cameras
Examining skin tones, landscape detail, and low-light shots reveals the Sony A35’s smoother gradients and lower noise, while the YI M1 produces crisp images with vibrant color rendition under ideal lighting.
Who Should Buy Which?
Photographer Type | Suggested Camera | Why? |
---|---|---|
Beginner casual shooter | YI M1 | Easy to use, 4K video, compact, affordable |
Aspiring portrait photographer | Sony A35 | Larger sensor, better skin tone reproduction, phase AF |
Travel & street photographer | YI M1 | Lightweight, silent shutter, wifi remote |
Wildlife & sports shooter | Sony A35 | Faster AF, burst, bigger sensor |
Video-focused content creator | YI M1 | 4K recording, wireless interface |
Budget-conscious enthusiasts | YI M1 | Price and features balance |
Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Perfect Creative Partner
Both Sony A35 and YI M1 have stood the test of time as entry-level cameras with distinct strengths.
- The Sony A35 shines in still photography performance - larger sensor, fast DSLR-style autofocus, and robust handling make it ideal if your priority is image quality and traditional shooting experience.
- The YI M1 excels as a modern, compact mirrorless camera for those who want portability, video versatility with 4K, and wireless connectivity, all at a budget-friendly price.
Your choice ultimately hinges on your shooting style and priorities. Are you leaning towards a classic DSLR feel with superior image quality or a sleek mirrorless that doubles as a beginner-friendly video rig?
The best way forward is to try both if possible, and consider lenses and accessories you want to grow with. Both systems offer a pathway into passionate photography and creative exploration.
Additional Resources to Explore
- Check out beginner-friendly portrait prime lenses for Sony A-mount
- Explore Micro Four Thirds zoom lenses perfect for travel on the YI M1
- Investigate external audio solutions if video recording is your focus
- Consider third-party batteries and grips to extend shooting sessions
Your photographic journey deserves equipment that inspires - these cameras have the tools to do exactly that.
If you want to start your hands-on testing or dive deeper into specific lenses or workflow tips for either camera, don’t hesitate to reach out or visit a local camera store to hold these models. Seeing how they feel in your hands and testing their interfaces are irreplaceable steps toward buying confidence.
Happy shooting!
Sony A35 vs YI M1 Specifications
Sony SLT-A35 | YI M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | YI |
Model | Sony SLT-A35 | YI M1 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-09-20 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 15 | 81 |
Cross focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 143 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 921k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,150k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 415 grams (0.91 lb) | 350 grams (0.77 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 763 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 images | 450 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-FW50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $598 | $320 |