Sony A65 vs Sony A68

Sony A65 vs. Sony A68: A Definitive Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right camera is an exciting yet daunting task, especially when two models come from the same brand and similar lines. Today, we unpack the Sony A65 and Sony A68, two entry-level DSLRs with translucent mirror technology, to help you decide which suits your creative journey best. Having tested both extensively, we’ll walk through their core differences, strengths, and real-world performance across multiple photography disciplines. Our goal is to empower you with insights based on hands-on experience so you can invest confidently.

First Impressions: Design, Build, and Ergonomics

Both the Sony A65 and A68 feature robust compact SLR bodies employing the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, making them compatible with the same broad lens ecosystem - over 140 options at your disposal. Right off the bat, handling will feel familiar if you’ve used Sony SLTs before.

• Sony A65 is slightly more compact (132 x 97 x 81 mm) and weighs 622g.
• Sony A68 measures a bit larger (143 x 104 x 81 mm) but trims weight down to 610g.

The ergonomics differ subtly but meaningfully:

• The A65 offers a fully articulated 3” screen with 921k dots, enhancing flexibility in composing shots from unconventional angles.
• The A68 opts for a tilting 2.7" screen at 461k dots, less detailed and versatile but still convenient for live-view shooting.

On top, the button layout is clean and thoughtfully placed on both models, though the A65’s slightly larger grip gives you a more reassuring hold for extended shoots.

If you value comfort and a bit of flex in viewing angles, the A65’s articulating screen and ergonomic grip provide a better experience. The A68 feels a touch more dated here but remains a sturdy performer in hand.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

Both cameras share a 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor that’s 23.5 x 15.6 mm in size, delivering maximum images at 6000 x 4000 resolution with a 1.5x crop factor. Details such as antialiasing filters are present, and both support 3:2 and 16:9 aspect ratios.

However, the A68 has the edge with its upgraded Bionz X image processor over the original Bionz in the A65. This manifests in cleaner images, enhanced dynamic range, and better noise handling at high ISOs.

DxOMark lab tests underline these differences:

You see a clear improvement in the A68’s dynamic range, which directly benefits landscape and high-contrast scenes by preserving more detail in shadows and highlights. The color depth gain means richer, more nuanced color graduations.

While the A65 manages respectable noise control, the A68’s noise remains more controlled up to ISO 25600 (native max), compared with ISO 12800 native on the A65.

User Interface and Viewing Experience

Sony employs electronic viewfinders (EVF) on both models that are bright and reliable but differ in their specifications:

Though the A65’s EVF provides a sharper, larger viewfinder image, the A68’s is still bright enough for accurate framing and focus assessment. For action or fast shooting scenarios, EVF lag is minimal on both and unlikely to detract from your photography.

Turning back to the rear LCD screens, the A65’s higher resolution and articulation slightly tilt the scales in its favor, particularly for video recording or live view composition.

The menus and control interfaces across both cameras are similar, featuring Sony’s traditionally straightforward layout with dedicated joystick-style AF point selection on the A68 - the A65 uses directional buttons. If you prefer tactile AF point navigation, the A68’s joystick is a welcome improvement.

Autofocus System: Precision and Speed in Focus Tracking

One of the defining differences lies in the autofocus system. Both cameras utilize Sony's translucent mirror technology coupled with phase-detection AF, but the A68 significantly upgrades the hardware here:

The A68’s 79 focus points provide vastly improved tracking accuracy and coverage, critical for sports, wildlife, and fast-moving subjects. This correlates with a noticeable boost in continuous autofocus performance and burst shooting usability.

In contrast, the A65’s 15 points limit flexibility and tracking effectiveness, which may frustrate some advanced users or those photographing unpredictable action.

Burst Shooting and Performance in Action

When shooting bursts, every frame counts:

Despite the A65’s higher frame rate, the A68 compensates with a larger buffer allowing longer bursts, especially in JPEG. The practical net result is that the Sony A68 is better suited to extended action sequences, making it a better choice for wildlife and sports photography.

Video Capabilities: Facts for Vloggers and Hybrid Shooters

Both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p video but differ in codecs and frame rates:

The A68 offers more advanced XAVC S codec support for better compression efficiency and quality, a plus for serious videographers. Conversely, the A65 can shoot 60p progressive frames, which is better for smoothing motion, though the difference is subtle.

Both lack headphone outputs, which limits audio monitoring flexibility. However, inclusion of in-body sensor stabilization helps smooth handheld video, a boon for run-and-gun content creators.

Battery, Connectivity, and Storage Options

The battery in both cameras is the NP-FM500H, providing solid endurance for a day of shooting:

The A65 technically offers better battery life, potentially extending your shooting sessions, but 510 shots on the A68 remain competitive.

Wireless connectivity is similar: both support Eye-Fi card compatibility only, no built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, which is a notable omission in the modern era.

Durability and Weather Resistance

Neither camera offers official environmental sealing or rugged protection such as dust or water resistance, thereby calling for careful handling outdoors or in harsh conditions.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

The cameras both use the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, opening access to an extensive range of lenses from Sony and third-party manufacturers:

• Over 140 lenses available, from wide-angle primes to super-telephoto zooms.
• Compatibility with A-mount and, with adapters, some E-mount lenses.

This opens possibilities for various photography genres without needing to switch brands or lens systems.

Real-World Applications: How These Cameras Perform Across Genres

To understand how these features translate into daily use, we tested both cameras in multiple photography styles with matched lenses.

Sony A65 front Sony A65 screen back Sony A68 front Sony A68 screen back

Portrait Photography

• Sony A65: The 15-point AF and decent live-view face detection produce good results, but the limited AF points struggle with eye tracking and selective AF precision.
• Sony A68: The expanded 79 AF points deliver better eye and face tracking, resulting in sharper portraits and better bokeh rendition. The improved color depth yields skin tones that feel more natural and lifelike.

Landscape Photography

• The A68’s superior dynamic range and ISO flexibility better capture shadow detail and bright highlights, essential for challenging landscapes.
• The A65 holds its own with high-res images but requires careful exposure bracketing to compensate for dynamic range limits.
• Neither is weather sealed, so protective measures are advisable outdoors.

Wildlife Photography

• Thanks to its faster, more reliable autofocus system and larger AF coverage, the A68 outperforms the A65, especially when tracking erratic animal movement.
• The A65’s quicker burst rate is an advantage but is offset by its weaker AF tracking, affecting keeper rates.

Sports Photography

• The A68’s robust autofocus, decent burst buffer, and image processor synergy provide more consistent focus locks and longer bursts under challenging lighting.
• The A65 shoots faster but requires more precise pre-focusing due to AF limitations.

Street Photography

• Both cameras are compact but the A65’s articulating screen gives more discreet compositions.
• Low-light performance is similar, though the A68’s noise management permits more handheld shooting.

Macro Photography

• Sensor-based stabilization in both cameras helps, but the A68’s quieter and more accurate autofocus aids in locking onto fine details.
• Neither offers focus bracketing or stacking, so manual techniques are necessary.

Night and Astro Photography

• Both handle long exposures well, down to 30 seconds shutter speeds.
• The A68’s better noise control at high ISO makes it preferable for star field shooting.

Travel Photography

• Portability and battery life favor the A65 slightly due to lighter weight and longer endurance.
• The broader AF system on the A68 is an advantage when shooting diverse subjects.

Professional Work

• Both support RAW formats and flexible manual controls.
• The A68’s superior dynamic range and AF system lend it to semi-pro workflows.
• Neither camera is built for rigorous professional use in harsh environments but is suitable for learning and portfolio development.

Summarizing the Performance Gap

Making Your Choice: Which Sony SLT Fits Your Needs?

Choose the Sony A65 if:

• You want a slightly more compact, ergonomically comfy camera with an articulating screen.
• You shoot primarily portrait, street, and travel photography requiring flexibility in framing.
• Battery longevity is a top priority.
• You’re drawn to a slightly higher frame rate for sports photography, and you work mainly in good light.

Choose the Sony A68 if:

• You need a more sophisticated autofocus system for wildlife, sports, or fast action.
• Image quality, especially dynamic range and color depth, is important to your work.
• You value newer video codecs for hybrid photo/video projects.
• You prefer joystick controls for AF point selection and can trade a little battery life for performance gains.

Both cameras offer an excellent introduction to SLT technology with sensor-based stabilization - a boon for handheld shooting. While the A68 advantages often justify its choice at a lower price point, your shooting style and priorities should direct your decision.

Final Thoughts and Getting Started

Both the Sony A65 and A68 remain relevant cameras offering solid APS-C sensor performance, manual controls, and an extensive lens mount. Although technology has advanced since their release, these models stand as budget-friendly gateways into creative photography.

We recommend trying to handle both in person since tactile feel matters. Also, pair your chosen camera with versatile lenses - such as the Sony 50mm f/1.8 for portraits or a Sony 18-135mm for travel - to maximize your investment.

Don’t hesitate to dive in, experiment with manual settings, and explore the creative horizons these cameras open. Your best images start here.

Additional Resources and Recommendations

• Check out Sony A-mount lenses and consider third-party options for specialized needs like macro or telephoto.
• Invest in a fast SD card for video and burst shooting.
• Explore online forums and tutorials specific to Sony SLTs for workflow tips and troubleshooting.

Thank you for joining us in this deep dive. May your photography adventure with either the Sony A65 or A68 be full of discovery and stunning images!