Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was announced 4 months before the DP2 Merrill and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GR Digital IV scores against the DP2 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
GR Digital IV | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
DP2 Merrill | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP2 Merrill
GR Digital IV | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | February 2012 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV enjoys physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital IV against the DP2 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and DP2 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and DP2 Merrill.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will produce greater detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $931 |