Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10
96 Imaging
40 Features
32 Overall
36
![Canon ELPH 130 front Canon ELPH 130 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Canon-ELPH-130.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10/Casio-EX-ZS10-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Alternative Name is IXUS 140
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Canon and Casio. The resolution of the ELPH 130 (16MP) and the EX-ZS10 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The ELPH 130 was launched 2 years later than the EX-ZS10 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the ELPH 130 scores versus the EX-ZS10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 130 and Casio Exilim EX-ZS10. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 130 Gallery and Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 130 over the Casio EX-ZS10
ELPH 130 | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Canon ELPH 130
EX-ZS10 | ELPH 130 |
---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 130 and Casio EX-ZS10
ELPH 130 | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 130 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZS10 has specifications of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the ELPH 130 against the EX-ZS10.
![Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 size comparison Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-ELPH-130-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 130 and EX-ZS10 is 96 and 99 respectively.
![Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-ELPH-130-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 130 and EX-ZS10.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Canon ELPH 130 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 130 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
![Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-ELPH-130-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-ELPH-130-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-ZS10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 130 vs Casio EX-ZS10 Specifications
Canon ELPH 130 | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon ELPH 130 | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 |
Also called as | IXUS 140 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | - |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133g (0.29 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $120 |