Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240
96 Imaging
40 Features
32 Overall
36
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Alternative Name is IXUS 140
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Canon ELPH 130 versus Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the ELPH 130 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ELPH 130 was revealed 3 years after the TL240 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the ELPH 130 scores versus the TL240 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon ELPH 130 and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 130 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 130 over the Samsung TL240
| ELPH 130 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Canon ELPH 130
| TL240 | ELPH 130 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 130 and Samsung TL240
| ELPH 130 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 130 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon ELPH 130 versus Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the ELPH 130 compared to the TL240.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 130 and TL240 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 130 and TL240.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Canon ELPH 130 to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer ELPH 130 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 130 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 130 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 130 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | IXUS 140 | ST5000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133g (0.29 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $171 |