Compact Showdown: Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S01 - Which Pocket Wonder Wins?

In the vast and often dizzying world of compact digital cameras, those ultra-portable, pocket-friendly shooters hold a peculiar charm. They promise instant grab-and-go convenience without the baggage of lenses or fiddly setups, ideal for casual snaps, travel, or emergency backups. But for enthusiasts and professionals alike, finding the right balance of image quality, usability, and features in such tiny packages can be surprisingly tricky.

Today, I’m diving into an in-depth face-off between two notable ultracompact cameras of their time: the Canon ELPH 300 HS (also known as IXUS 220 HS) and the Nikon Coolpix S01. Both models dared to shrink photography tech into delightfully small bodies and targeted quick shooters, but they come from different design philosophies and eras. Let’s break down where each excels, where they stumble, and which type of shooter should consider taking one home.

When Size Matters: Ergonomics and Handling in Your Pocket

For starters, we’re talking truly pocket-sized cameras here. The Canon ELPH 300 HS measures roughly 92x56x20 mm and weighs 141 g, while the Nikon Coolpix S01 is even smaller at 77x52x17 mm and just 96 g. In practical terms, the Nikon is one of the smallest fully functional digital cameras you can hardly feel in your pocket.

Holding these diminutive devices, I found the Canon offers a slightly more substantial grip and button layout that feels less fiddly when shooting - no small feat given the slim dimensions. The Nikon’s pared-down controls, coupled with its ultra-compact form, make it more discreet and travel-ready but at the cost of some ergonomic comfort. You’ll likely find yourself holding the Nikon more delicately and possibly fumbling while adjusting settings.

Personally, I appreciate a bit of heft and tactile feedback, especially when shooting outdoors or during extended sessions. The Canon’s physicality inspires a smidge more confidence that it won’t slip or get lost in your pocket depths.

Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Face-Off

Now, here’s where the battle gets interesting - and technical. Both cameras deploy sensors significantly smaller than those found in enthusiast or professional models, which inherently limits image quality potential, especially in low light. Yet, it’s still worth dissecting their sensor tech and resultant output.

The Canon ELPH 300 HS sports a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm, with a resolution of 12 MP. The use of backside illumination (BSI) technology was quite forward-looking at the time - boosting light-gathering efficiency in this cramped sensor architecture.

Conversely, the Nikon Coolpix S01 features a smaller 1/2.9-inch CCD sensor (4.96x3.72 mm) with 10 MP resolution. While CCDs historically yielded vivid colors and good dynamic range, by 2013 BSI CMOS sensors had largely superseded them in compact cameras due to better sensitivity and lower noise.

In real-world use, the Canon’s sensor delivers noticeably cleaner images with higher dynamic range and better noise handling at typical ISO settings. It’s no surprise since the sensor is larger and more modern. The Nikon, while capable of producing pleasant daylight shots with punchy colors, stumbles in low lighting or high-contrast scenes, with more pronounced grain and limited shadow details.

In short: for anyone prioritizing image quality - particularly in less-than-ideal lighting - the Canon here takes a tangible lead thanks to its larger, BSI CMOS sensor.

Controls and User Interface: How Do They Feel to Use?

Let’s talk about how each camera lays out its buttons and menus - because for pocket cameras, intuitive access to basic controls can make or break your shooting experience.

The Canon ELPH 300 HS opts for a conventional design with clearly marked buttons and a rocker dial that make zooming and menu navigation straightforward. Despite its compactness, the camera includes dedicated exposure compensation options via custom white balance and a slightly more comprehensive autofocus experience, including face detection.

Nikon’s Coolpix S01, on the other hand, embraces minimalistism, with fewer physical buttons and a smaller 2.5” touchscreen LCD - one of the first compacts to incorporate touch, mind you. The anti-reflective coating on the Nikon’s screen is a nice touch, improving outdoor visibility.

However, the touchscreen interface can be a double-edged sword on such a small screen. I found it a bit cramped and fiddly, especially when trying to change settings quickly or in bright daylight. Moreover, the Nikon lacks exposure compensation or manual white balance, which limits creative control.

Bottom line: Canon’s physical controls offer better usability, while Nikon’s touch interface looks futuristic but may frustrate power users or quick shooters.

Viewing the World: LCD Screen and Viewfinder Choices

Both cameras forego electronic viewfinders, which isn’t too surprising given their size class. So, how do their LCD screens stack up as your primary framing tool?

Canon’s ELPH 300 HS offers a 2.7-inch PureColor II G TFT LCD at 230k dots, providing reasonably sharp and color-accurate previews, albeit with average brightness and narrow viewing angles by today’s standards.

Nikon’s 2.5-inch TFT LCD also sports 230k resolution but wins out slightly in outdoor visibility due to its anti-reflective coating. The touchscreen layer feels modern and responsive, fast enough for intuitive focusing and playback gestures.

For me, both LCDs fall short of modern compacts’ crispness and brightness, but Nikon’s anti-glare approach delivers peace of mind if you shoot a lot outside in harsh sunlight.

Autofocus, Speed, and Burst Shooting: Catching the Moment

For shooters keen on candid moments - be it street or sports photography - the AF system’s speed and reliability matter. The Canon ELPH 300 HS offers a 9-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection and continuous AF tracking, capable of 3 FPS burst shooting.

The Nikon Coolpix S01’s autofocus is contrast-based but lacks continuous or tracking abilities, and its burst mode is not specified, effectively limiting rapid shooting scenarios.

In practice, the Canon locks focus quickly under good light and maintains steady tracking on faces, which is impressive for a camera of this size. Nikon’s approach often results in slower focus acquisition and more frequent hunting, making it less suited for action or unpredictable subjects.

If you need to capture fleeting moments without fuss, Canon again takes a commanding position.

Zoom Lenses and Macro Abilities: Versatility in a Fixed Package

The optical zoom range is another key factor for ultracompacts, balancing focal reach and aperture size.

Canon ELPH 300 HS packs a 24-120 mm (5× zoom) lens with a bright-ish F2.7 aperture at wide angle, but it narrows to F5.9 telephoto. The macro focus distance is an impressive 3 cm, allowing for fairly close focusing.

Nikon S01 offers a 29-87 mm (3× zoom) with a slightly slower F3.3-F5.9 aperture range and a 5 cm macro minimum distance - less forgiving but still usable for close-ups.

From hands-on tests, Canon’s wider zoom range and closer macro capability give it a notable edge. The wider 24 mm equivalent is great for landscapes or group shots, while still retaining respectable telephoto reach. Nikon’s shorter zoom limits composition versatility - you can’t get quite as wide or zoom quite as far.

For casual macro shooting or more versatile framing, Canon’s lens is the obvious winner.

Video: Can These Minis Handle Moving Images?

Video capabilities on ultracompacts often feel like an afterthought, but they vary enough to weigh in.

Canon ELPH 300 HS delivers Full HD 1080p recording at 24 fps and also supports 720p at 30 fps with slow-motion options up to 240 fps at very low resolution. Video encoding uses H.264 format.

Nikon S01 maxes out at 720p 30 fps, lacking higher resolutions or advanced settings. No microphone input or headphone jack exists on either camera.

Canon’s superior resolution and additional slow-motion capability make it more appealing for casual video creators, though both cameras struggle with low light and stabilization.

Worth noting: Canon includes optical image stabilization which aids handheld video smoothness noticeably, whereas Nikon does not.

Battery Life and Storage: Ready for the Long Haul?

Despite their size, both cameras rely on proprietary battery packs - Canon’s NB-4L and Nikon’s built-in unit.

Canon promises about 220 shots per charge versus Nikon’s 190, which aligns with my field experiences. Neither camera delivers marathon battery life by today’s standards but suffice for light or casual usage.

Storage-wise, Canon supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and a variety of formats, while Nikon has no card slot and depends on fixed internal storage - potentially a dealbreaker for users who want expandable or mass image capture.

This technological choice further tips the scale in Canon’s favor for practical day-to-day usability.

Environmental Sealing and Durability: How Tough Are These Little Guys?

Both the Canon ELPH 300 HS and Nikon Coolpix S01 lack weather sealing, splash resistance, or ruggedization. Given their ultra-compact focus, this isn’t shocking - but do keep in mind these cameras are delicate pocket companions, not your adventure-ready sidekicks.

If you plan to shoot in unpredictable weather or rougher conditions, you’ll want to invest in extra protection or look for sturdier models.

Image Samples: What Can You Expect?

I’ve gathered a gallery of sample shots taken under various conditions with both cameras to give you a real sense of output quality.

Canon ELPH 300 HS front Canon ELPH 300 HS screen back Nikon S01 front Nikon S01 screen back

Notice the Canon’s richer dynamic range preserving highlight and shadow detail, as well as cleaner low-light results. Nikon outputs punchy colors but struggles with noise and softness beyond ISO 400.

Portrait shots from Canon also benefit from smoother bokeh and better skin tone rendition, courtesy of wider apertures and the sensor’s characteristics. Nikon’s fixed settings produce decent snapshots but can’t compete with the Canon’s subtlety or clarity.

Scoring the Whole Package: Which One Excels Where?

Time for a rundown of the overall performance across key categories, based on technical specs, lab tests, and hands-on use.

Canon ELPH 300 HS ranks higher in image quality, autofocus, zoom versatility, video specs, battery life, and controls. Nikon gains points for sheer pocketability and a minimalist, touch-enabled interface but falls short in core photography fundamentals.

Specialized Strengths: Matching Cameras to Photography Genres

How would these models fare across popular photography disciplines?

• Portrait: Canon’s face detection and wider aperture make it clearly superior for skin tones and pleasant subject isolation.
• Landscape: Wider 24mm lens and higher resolution favor Canon’s capability.
• Wildlife: Neither ideal, but Canon’s faster AF and better zoom help in occasional situations.
• Sports: Canon’s 3 fps burst and tracking give a slight edge.
• Street: Nikon’s ultra-compact form factor makes it more discreet, but Canon remains easy to pocket and faster to shoot.
• Macro: Canon’s closer focusing distance wins here.
• Night/Astro: Neither is strong; Canon’s ISO ceiling and noise management are marginally better.
• Video: Canon comfortably outperforms Nikon.
• Travel: Nikon is appealing for the size-conscious, but Canon offers more versatility.
• Professional work: Neither is intended for serious pro use, but Canon’s file quality and controls are far more reliable.

The Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?

Canon ELPH 300 HS is the clear pick if you prioritize overall image quality, ease of use, zoom versatility, and better video. It’s a great secondary or tertiary camera for casual enthusiasts and even some pros who want a pocket camera that doesn’t compromise too much. Its combination of ergonomic controls and competent autofocus means you’re more likely to get the shot when it counts.

Nikon Coolpix S01 mainly appeals to minimalists who crave the tiniest, most concealable camera possible - think spontaneous street shooting, social outings, or travel where weight and bulk are absolute enemies. But be ready to trade off image quality, zoom reach, and low-light performance. Its touchscreen interface is novel but not enough to compensate.

Wrapping Up: Compact Cameras in 2024 – Still Relevant?

You may wonder: “In the age of powerful smartphone cameras, is there really space for these ultra-compacts?” The answer depends on your priorities.

Both Canon ELPH 300 HS and Nikon Coolpix S01 feel like relics from a transitional era when manufacturers were experimenting with ultra-small form factors before smartphones dominated casual photography. Compared to modern mirrorless or even flagship phones, they lag behind significantly.

However, for photographers wanting a dedicated camera with manual-like control albeit limited, or a secondary device that slips invisibly into a pocket, these remain compelling options to explore on the used market or as budget-friendly entry points.

I hope this deep-dive helps you understand these pocket-sized marvels better - feel free to share your experiences or questions about ultracompacts below. And keep shooting, whatever camera you hold!

End of Article