Clicky

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
30
Overall
33
Canon ELPH 300 HS front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 300 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.7-5.9) lens
  • 141g - 92 x 56 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Alternative Name is IXUS 220 HS
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the ELPH 300 HS (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The ELPH 300 HS was released very close to the ST65 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the ELPH 300 HS matches up vs the ST65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 300 HS over the Samsung ST65

 ELPH 300 HS ST65 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Canon ELPH 300 HS

 ST65 ELPH 300 HS 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Canon ELPH 300 HS and Samsung ST65

 ELPH 300 HS ST65 
IntroducedFebruary 2011January 2011Similar generation
Manual focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 300 HS provides external dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the ELPH 300 HS versus the ST65.

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 300 HS and ST65 is 96 and 99 respectively.

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 300 HS and ST65.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung ST65 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively.

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS Portrait photography details
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography details
27
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
28
good megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS Street photography details
Samsung ST65 Street photography details
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
49
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low maximum ISO (0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Sports photography camera
32
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
26
good megapixels (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS Travel photography info
Samsung ST65 Travel photography info
58
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
71
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Landscape photography camera
33
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
37
very good max aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3")
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 300 HS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST65 as a Vlogging camera
34
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone port
27
very good max aperture (f)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Canon ELPH 300 HS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 300 HS and Samsung ST65
 Canon ELPH 300 HSSamsung ST65
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model Canon ELPH 300 HS Samsung ST65
Also called as IXUS 220 HS -
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-02-07 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.7-5.9 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology PureColor II G TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 141 gr (0.31 pounds) -
Dimensions 92 x 56 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-4L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $250 $130