Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR
95 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 96 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Alternate Name is IXUS 230 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced January 2011
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Canon ELPH 310 HS versus Fujifilm F500 EXR, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 310 HS (12MP) and Fujifilm F500 EXR (16MP) and the ELPH 310 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F500 EXR (1/2") use different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ELPH 310 HS was manufactured 8 months after the Fujifilm F500 EXR and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon ELPH 310 HS being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F500 EXR being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the ELPH 310 HS grades against the Fujifilm F500 EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 310 HS and Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR. The entire galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 310 HS Gallery and Fujifilm F500 EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 310 HS over the Fujifilm F500 EXR
ELPH 310 HS | Fujifilm F500 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | January 2011 | Newer by 8 months | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F500 EXR over the Canon ELPH 310 HS
Fujifilm F500 EXR | ELPH 310 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 310 HS and Fujifilm F500 EXR
ELPH 310 HS | Fujifilm F500 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 310 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F500 EXR has dimensions of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 310 HS versus Fujifilm F500 EXR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 310 HS against the Fujifilm F500 EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 310 HS and Fujifilm F500 EXR is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 310 HS and Fujifilm F500 EXR.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The ELPH 310 HS because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Fujifilm F500 EXR will show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger ELPH 310 HS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 310 HS vs Fujifilm F500 EXR Specifications
Canon ELPH 310 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon ELPH 310 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR |
Otherwise known as | IXUS 230 HS | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-23 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 pounds) | 215g (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-4L | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $400 | $430 |