Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15
94 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-105mm (F2.0-5.8) lens
- 185g - 101 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched February 2011
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 310 HS / IXY 31S
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Canon and Casio. The resolution of the ELPH 500 HS (12MP) and the EX-H15 (14MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ELPH 500 HS was announced 14 months after the EX-H15 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the ELPH 500 HS grades vs the EX-H15 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 500 HS & Casio Exilim EX-H15. The whole galleries are available at Canon ELPH 500 HS Gallery & Casio EX-H15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 500 HS over the Casio EX-H15
| ELPH 500 HS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
| Display sizing | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Canon ELPH 500 HS
| EX-H15 | ELPH 500 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 500 HS and Casio EX-H15
| ELPH 500 HS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 500 HS offers physical measurements of 101mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Casio EX-H15 has proportions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the ELPH 500 HS against the EX-H15.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 500 HS and EX-H15 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 500 HS and EX-H15.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-H15 to offer you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The newer ELPH 500 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon ELPH 500 HS vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 500 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon ELPH 500 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 310 HS / IXY 31S | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-02-07 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-105mm (4.4x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.8 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 161g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 56 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $175 | $300 |
