Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced March 2012
- Also Known as IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Canon A3400 IS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Canon. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and A3400 IS (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 510 HS was introduced within a month of the A3400 IS which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the ELPH 510 HS matches up versus the A3400 IS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 510 HS and Canon PowerShot A3400 IS. The whole galleries are available at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery and Canon A3400 IS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Canon A3400 IS
| ELPH 510 HS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| A3400 IS | ELPH 510 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Canon A3400 IS
| ELPH 510 HS | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2012 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 510 HS offers exterior dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Canon A3400 IS has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Canon A3400 IS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the ELPH 510 HS and the A3400 IS.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 510 HS and A3400 IS is 93 and 96 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 510 HS and A3400 IS.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Canon A3400 IS to resolve extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Canon A3400 IS Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Canon |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS |
| Also referred to as | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-03-01 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 126 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | NB-11L |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $230 |