Clicky

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
41
Overall
38
Canon ELPH 510 HS front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front
Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Key Specs

Canon ELPH 510 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released March 2012
  • Alternative Name is IXUS 1100 HS
Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced March 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Fujifilm S8400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The ELPH 510 HS was introduced 12 months before the Fujifilm S8400W which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon ELPH 510 HS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the ELPH 510 HS matches up against the Fujifilm S8400W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Fujifilm S8400W

 ELPH 510 HS Fujifilm S8400W 
Screen sizing3.2"3"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Canon ELPH 510 HS

 Fujifilm S8400W ELPH 510 HS 
IntroducedMarch 2013March 2012Newer by 12 months
Focus manually Very precise focus

Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Fujifilm S8400W

 ELPH 510 HS Fujifilm S8400W 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 510 HS comes with physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8400W has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Fujifilm S8400W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 510 HS against the Fujifilm S8400W.

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 510 HS and Fujifilm S8400W is 93 and 61 respectively.

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 510 HS and Fujifilm S8400W.

All in all, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S8400W to show extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 510 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon ELPH 510 HS
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S8400W
27
provides face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
39
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS Street photography factors
Fujifilm S8400W Street photography factors
65
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (206 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS Sports photography features
Fujifilm S8400W Sports photography features
32
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
52
excellent zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS Travel photography highlights
Fujifilm S8400W Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competition in class (206g)
includes focus via touch
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
52
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1056mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS Landscape photography information
Fujifilm S8400W Landscape photography information
37
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.2")
image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
46
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 510 HS as a Vlogging camera
Fujifilm S8400W as a Vlogging camera
35
pretty wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (206 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
24
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
heavier than average in class (670g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Fujifilm S8400W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 510 HS and Fujifilm S8400W
 Canon ELPH 510 HSFujifilm FinePix S8400W
General Information
Brand Name Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon ELPH 510 HS Fujifilm FinePix S8400W
Also called as IXUS 1100 HS -
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-03-01 2013-03-22
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-336mm (12.0x) 24-1056mm (44.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.4-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3.2 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology PureColor II TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 97 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1700s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206g (0.45 pounds) 670g (1.48 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Battery style - AA
Battery model NB-9L 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $200 $300