Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced March 2012
- Alternative Name is IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ELPH 510 HS was launched 6 months after the Easyshare M5370 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the ELPH 510 HS scores against the Easyshare M5370 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| ELPH 510 HS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| Easyshare M5370 | ELPH 510 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| ELPH 510 HS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2012 | September 2011 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 510 HS enjoys physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 510 HS vs the Easyshare M5370.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 510 HS and Easyshare M5370 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 510 HS and Easyshare M5370.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Also referred to as | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-03-01 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-9L | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $160 |