Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Released March 2012
- Alternative Name is IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus 9000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 510 HS was brought out 2 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the ELPH 510 HS scores vs the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Olympus 9000
| ELPH 510 HS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2012 | May 2009 | Fresher by 35 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| 9000 | ELPH 510 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus 9000
| ELPH 510 HS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 510 HS offers outside measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 510 HS versus the 9000.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 510 HS and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 510 HS and 9000.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you should expect comparable quality of photos however you should consider the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher ELPH 510 HS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | IXUS 1100 HS | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-03-01 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $200 | $300 |