Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Released March 2012
- Alternate Name is IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ELPH 510 HS was revealed 2 years after the Tough-3000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the ELPH 510 HS scores vs the Tough-3000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are available at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Olympus Tough-3000
| ELPH 510 HS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 27 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| Tough-3000 | ELPH 510 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus Tough-3000
| ELPH 510 HS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 510 HS offers exterior dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 510 HS versus the Tough-3000.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 510 HS and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 510 HS and Tough-3000.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you should expect comparable quality of files although you will need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more modern ELPH 510 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Alternative name | IXUS 1100 HS | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-03-01 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $0 |