Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced March 2012
- Also referred to as IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ELPH 510 HS was released 16 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the ELPH 510 HS scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| ELPH 510 HS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| TG-2 iHS | ELPH 510 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | March 2012 | Fresher by 16 months | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 461k | Crisper screen (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| ELPH 510 HS | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 510 HS features outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 510 HS against the TG-2 iHS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 510 HS and TG-2 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 510 HS and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older ELPH 510 HS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Otherwise known as | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-03-01 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-9L | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $200 | $380 |