Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
67 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed March 2012
- Other Name is IXUS 1100 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe ELPH 510 HS was unveiled 22 months prior to the WB1100F which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon ELPH 510 HS being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the ELPH 510 HS matches up versus the WB1100F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Samsung WB1100F. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Samsung WB1100F
| ELPH 510 HS | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| WB1100F | ELPH 510 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | March 2012 | Newer by 22 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Samsung WB1100F
| ELPH 510 HS | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 510 HS provides outside measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Look at the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Samsung WB1100F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the ELPH 510 HS vs the WB1100F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 510 HS and WB1100F is 93 and 67 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The image below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 510 HS and WB1100F.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB1100F to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 510 HS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Samsung WB1100F |
| Alternative name | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-03-01 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 512 gr (1.13 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-9L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $250 |