Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 510 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Released March 2012
- Also referred to as IXUS 1100 HS
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Refreshed by Sony WX350
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Sony WX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ELPH 510 HS was launched 11 months before the WX300 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the ELPH 510 HS grades against the WX300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Sony WX300
| ELPH 510 HS | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| WX300 | ELPH 510 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 |  | March 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Sony WX300
| ELPH 510 HS | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 510 HS offers external measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Sony WX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the ELPH 510 HS against the WX300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 510 HS and WX300 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 510 HS and WX300.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony WX300 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 510 HS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX300 Portrait photography highlights
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon ELPH 510 HS
Street photography with Sony WX300
image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
lighter than competition (206g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (166g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Sports photography info
Sony WX300 Sports photography info
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (206g)
supports touch focus
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great reach (336mm)
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than others (166 grams)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Landscape photography details
Sony WX300 Landscape photography details
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3.2")
image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Vlogging details
Sony WX300 Vlogging details
reasonably wide (28mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (206g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no mic socket
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (166 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Also called | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-03-01 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 166 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-9L | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $200 | $330 |