Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Alternate Name is IXUS 500 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon ELPH 520 HS versus Casio EX-Z400, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and the EX-Z400 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ELPH 520 HS was released 3 years after the EX-Z400 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the ELPH 520 HS matches up against the EX-Z400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon ELPH 520 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z400. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Casio EX-Z400
| ELPH 520 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
| EX-Z400 | ELPH 520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Casio EX-Z400
| ELPH 520 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 520 HS has got outside measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z400 has measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Canon ELPH 520 HS versus Casio EX-Z400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 520 HS and the EX-Z400.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 520 HS and EX-Z400 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 520 HS and EX-Z400.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z400 to show more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The newer ELPH 520 HS should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 |
| Also called as | IXUS 500 HS | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.6-7.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 130 grams (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | NP-40 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $279 | $0 |