Clicky

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
33
Overall
33
Canon ELPH 520 HS front
 
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs

Canon ELPH 520 HS
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
  • Alternate Name is IXUS 500 HS
Fujifilm Z900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
  • Launched April 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Canon ELPH 520 HS versus Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the ELPH 520 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The ELPH 520 HS was revealed 10 months after the Fujifilm Z900EXR so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the ELPH 520 HS grades vs the Fujifilm Z900EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Fujifilm Z900EXR

 ELPH 520 HS Fujifilm Z900EXR 
LaunchedJanuary 2012April 2011Newer by 10 months
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Canon ELPH 520 HS

 Fujifilm Z900EXR ELPH 520 HS 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm Z900EXR

 ELPH 520 HS Fujifilm Z900EXR 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 520 HS offers outside measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Z900EXR has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

See the Canon ELPH 520 HS versus Fujifilm Z900EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 520 HS compared to the Fujifilm Z900EXR.

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm Z900EXR.

As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The ELPH 520 HS with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will provide greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern ELPH 520 HS will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon ELPH 520 HS
Portrait photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
26
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 520 HS Street photography features
Fujifilm Z900EXR Street photography features
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has focus via touch
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (151 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 520 HS Sports photography info
Fujifilm Z900EXR Sports photography info
29
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (190 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 520 HS
Travel photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
58
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (190 per charge)
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
65
has focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (151 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 520 HS Landscape photography advice
Fujifilm Z900EXR Landscape photography advice
35
relatively wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not available
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
not so great battery (190 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
50
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
sensor is small (1/2")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 520 HS Vlogging info
Fujifilm Z900EXR Vlogging info
32
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing mic socket
heavier than others in class (155g)
34
reasonably wide (28mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic support
heavier than competitors in class (151g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm Z900EXR
 Canon ELPH 520 HSFujifilm FinePix Z900EXR
General Information
Company Canon FujiFilm
Model type Canon ELPH 520 HS Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR
Otherwise known as IXUS 500 HS -
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2012-01-09 2011-04-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 5 EXR
Sensor type BSI-CMOS EXRCMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.4 x 4.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 30.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/3.9-4.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.6
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology PureColor II G TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 2.50 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 151 gr (0.33 lb)
Dimensions 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 shots 220 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-9L NP-45A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $279 $380