Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
- Alternative Name is IXUS 500 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and the M381 (12MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ELPH 520 HS was revealed 2 years after the M381 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the ELPH 520 HS matches up against the M381 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon ELPH 520 HS & Kodak EasyShare M381. The full galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Kodak M381
ELPH 520 HS | M381 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 30 months | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
M381 | ELPH 520 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Kodak M381
ELPH 520 HS | M381 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 520 HS comes with exterior measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M381 has dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 520 HS vs the M381.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 520 HS and M381 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 520 HS and M381.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Kodak M381 to offer greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 520 HS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M381 Specifications
Canon ELPH 520 HS | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
Otherwise known as | IXUS 500 HS | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2009-07-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.50 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 153 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-9L | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $170 |