Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 500 HS
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also Known as PL10
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is very comparable but the ELPH 520 HS (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ELPH 520 HS was announced 2 years later than the CL5 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the ELPH 520 HS grades vs the CL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung CL5. The whole galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Samsung CL5
| ELPH 520 HS | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
| CL5 | ELPH 520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung CL5
| ELPH 520 HS | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 520 HS has got physical measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung CL5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the ELPH 520 HS compared to the CL5.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 520 HS and CL5 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The graphic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 520 HS and CL5.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The ELPH 520 HS with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon ELPH 520 HS will provide extra detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The younger ELPH 520 HS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 520 HS | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called as | IXUS 500 HS | PL10 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $279 | $391 |