Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80
Portability
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 520 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
- Also Known as IXUS 500 HS
Samsung CL80
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Canon ELPH 520 HS versus Samsung CL80, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ELPH 520 HS was brought out 2 years after the CL80 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the ELPH 520 HS matches up versus the CL80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung CL80. The entire galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Samsung CL80
| ELPH 520 HS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
| CL80 | ELPH 520 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung CL80
| ELPH 520 HS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 520 HS has got external dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 520 HS versus Samsung CL80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the ELPH 520 HS versus the CL80.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 520 HS and CL80 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 520 HS and CL80.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung CL80 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 520 HS will have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon ELPH 520 HS
Portrait photography with Samsung CL80
has face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Street photography details
Samsung CL80 Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (155g)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch to focus
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition (160 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS as a Sports photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (190 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Travel photography features
Samsung CL80 Travel photography features
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
long reach (336mm)
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery life (190 shots)
more heavy than competitors in class (155 grams)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.4)
supports touch to focus
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (160g)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Landscape photography info
Samsung CL80 Landscape photography info
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery life (190 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
very good size screen (3.7")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Vlogging features
Samsung CL80 Vlogging features
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly display
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (155 grams)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic jack
heavier than competition (160g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 520 HS | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Samsung CL80 |
| Otherwise known as | IXUS 500 HS | ST5500 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $279 | $400 |