Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110
Portability
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 520 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 500 HS
Sony T110
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Sony T110, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and T110 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe ELPH 520 HS was launched 13 months after the T110 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the ELPH 520 HS matches up vs the T110 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon ELPH 520 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery & Sony T110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Sony T110
| ELPH 520 HS | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
| T110 | ELPH 520 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Sony T110
| ELPH 520 HS | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 520 HS provides physical measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony T110 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Sony T110 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 520 HS vs the T110.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 520 HS and T110 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The image here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 520 HS and T110.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony T110 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern ELPH 520 HS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Portrait photography details
Sony T110 Portrait photography details
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Street photography details
Sony T110 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than average (155g)
offers touch to focus
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Sports photography advice
Sony T110 Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (190 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Travel photography factors
Sony T110 Travel photography factors
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery power (190 per charge)
more heavy than average (155g)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
offers touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Landscape photography advice
Sony T110 Landscape photography advice
decently wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery power (190 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
really wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon ELPH 520 HS
Vlogging with Sony T110
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than average (155g)
really wide (27mm)
touchscreen capability
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony T110 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 520 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
| Also called as | IXUS 500 HS | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 5 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 2.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-9L | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $279 | $199 |