Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9
Portability
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 520 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
- Additionally Known as IXUS 500 HS
Sony TX9
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Introduced July 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ELPH 520 HS was brought out 19 months after the TX9 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the ELPH 520 HS scores vs the TX9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon ELPH 520 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The entire galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery and Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Sony TX9
| ELPH 520 HS | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
| TX9 | ELPH 520 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Sony TX9
| ELPH 520 HS | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 520 HS has external dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has measurements of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the ELPH 520 HS versus the TX9.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 520 HS and TX9 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 520 HS and TX9.
Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony TX9 to produce more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern ELPH 520 HS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Portrait photography highlights
Sony TX9 Portrait photography highlights
includes face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Street photography factors
Sony TX9 Street photography factors
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (155g)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch focus
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competition in class (149g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Sports photography advice
Sony TX9 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (190 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS as a Travel photography camera
Sony TX9 as a Travel photography camera
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great reach (336mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery power (190 per charge)
heavier than competitors in class (155g)
resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
provides touch focus
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (149g)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Landscape photography highlights
Sony TX9 Landscape photography highlights
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery power (190 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
very good size screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS Vlogging info
Sony TX9 Vlogging info
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (155g)
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (149g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Sony TX9 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 520 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
| Other name | IXUS 500 HS | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 5 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 149 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $279 | $799 |