Canon 100D vs Canon 60D
73 Imaging
59 Features
69 Overall
63


59 Imaging
58 Features
80 Overall
66
Canon 100D vs Canon 60D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 407g - 117 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed July 2013
- Alternate Name is EOS Rebel SL1
- Refreshed by Canon SL2
(Full Review)

Canon EOS 100D vs Canon EOS 60D: A Hands-On Comparison for Serious Photographers and Budget-Savvy Enthusiasts
When it comes to choosing the perfect Canon DSLR, the market can feel a bit like a maze, especially when legacy models like the Canon EOS 100D and Canon EOS 60D still pop up in search results or used gear listings. Both cameras boast Canon’s signature color science and compatibility with a vast lens ecosystem, but serve very different niches and budgets.
Having put thousands of photos through these two cameras in a variety of shooting conditions - from high-octane sports arenas to still-lifes in the studio - I’m here to share a practical and no-nonsense comparison of the Canon 100D and 60D. Whether you’re stepping up from a phone, upgrading from a beginner model, or hunting for an affordable workhorse, this detailed deep dive will help you decide which one packs the punch for your needs.
Ready? Let’s roll.
Size and Handling: The Battle of Compactness vs. Ergonomics
First impressions matter. The Canon 100D seems crafted for photographers who want DSLR image quality but hate the bulk associated with mid-sized bodies. At just 407 grams and dimensions of 117 x 91 x 69 mm, it’s one of Canon’s smallest APS-C DSLRs ever made. On the flip side, the 60D is built like the solid mid-sized DSLR workhorse it is - 755 grams, roughly 45% heavier, and chunkier at 145 x 106 x 79 mm.
In practice, the 100D’s compact size means it can slip into a jacket pocket or a smaller bag comfortably, and doubles as a great travel camera for minimalists. However, those with larger hands or who shoot for hours on end may find the smaller grip less comfortable. Controls are more cramped, and button travel is noticeably shallower.
The 60D wins points for physical controls (more on that shortly) and a handgrip that almost feels custom-molded to your palm. If you’re doing extended shoots or heavy zoom lens use (think wildlife telephotos or sports glass), the heft actually helps steady the camera and reduce fatigue.
You can see this stark design contrast from the top-down perspective below:
In terms of button layouts and dials, the 60D offers dedicated dials for exposure compensation and better separated function buttons, leading to quicker adjustments on the fly. The 100D keeps it simplified and friendly to newcomers but demands menu diving for more advanced tweaks.
Sensor and Image Quality: Similar Specs, Different Chips
Both cameras utilize APS-C sized CMOS sensors with identical dimensions (22.3 x 14.9 mm), so the base potential for image quality, resolution, and depth of field characteristics are comparable.
However, the devil is in the details:
- Canon 100D: 18 MP sensor combined with the more modern Digic 5 processor, which offers improved noise handling and color rendering.
- Canon 60D: Same 18 MP resolution but powered by the older Digic 4 processor.
In my lab and field tests, the 100D edges out the 60D very slightly in dynamic range and high ISO noise control. Canon’s Digic 5 processor contributes to cleaner output at ISO 1600 and above, crucial for low-light shooting or night photography.
DxOMark authoritative scores reflect this subtle gap:
- 100D overall score: 63
- 60D overall score: 66
While this seems to favor 60D, in real terms the difference is nuanced - the 100D has deeper color depth and DR improvements thanks to the newer processor but less max ISO headroom (12800 native vs. 6400 on the 60D - though the 60D is limited to lower boosted ISO).
In real-world portraits and landscapes, you’ll find both sensors equally capable of delivering crisp, detailed RAW files with Canon’s pleasing color science. The 100D’s newer processing gives skin tones a softer rendering, whereas the 60D produces punchier contrast native to its era.
Screens and Viewfinders: Your Eye on the Prize
Having a reliable and comfortable viewfinder + rear screen is key to any shooting experience, so here’s where these cameras diverge quite a bit.
The 100D sports a 3-inch fixed LCD with touch functionality, an unusual feature for an entry-level DSLR of its time. The screen resolution tops out at 1040k dots but is not articulating.
That fixed screen and touch interface makes navigating menus and selecting focus points easy - especially for beginners who expect smartphone-style interactions. However, the inability to tilt or swivel limits creative shooting angles (think low ground macro shots or high perspective street snaps).
The 60D comes with a fully articulating 3-inch Clear View TFT LCD, also 1040k dots but no touch capability.
Articulating screens are a boon for videographers and run-and-gun shooters, offering greater freedom to compose shots from tricky angles or self-record. Worth noting, however, the interface is less intuitive for focus selection without the touchscreen.
Now, the optical viewfinder is where the 60D shines. Equipped with a pentaprism, the viewfinder offers 96% coverage and 0.6x magnification. That translates to a brighter, clearer, and marginally more accurate framing experience for manual composition.
The 100D, on the other hand, uses a pentamirror with 95% coverage and 0.55x magnification - perfectly acceptable but understandably dimmer and with a slightly narrower view.
If you shoot primarily through the viewfinder (typical for DSLRs), the 60D will feel roomier and premium. If live view or video shooting dominates, the 100D’s touchscreen helps speed interaction.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking the Action
Now, this is a case where the 60D’s advanced features make a measurable difference. Both cameras use 9 autofocus points, but the 60D employs 9 cross-type AF points versus only 1 cross-type on the 100D, which mostly has linear AF points.
Cross-type points detect focus in both horizontal and vertical planes, offering improved accuracy and tracking - important for sports and wildlife shooters who need sharp, consistent focus on fast-moving subjects.
The 60D also supports continuous shooting at 5 frames per second (fps), outpacing the 100D’s modest 3 fps by a considerable margin.
This means for action photography - think kids’ soccer games, birds in flight, or urban street moments - the 60D gives you a better chance at sharp, in-focus shots bursting from the camera.
The 100D includes face detection and basic AF tracking, but it can struggle with erratic movement. Its autofocus is more suited to portraits, macro, or static subjects where precision matters over speed.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ruggedness for Real-World Use
The 60D brings weather sealing to the table, albeit limited. It features environmental sealing that resists dust and light moisture, extending usability in tough conditions, especially outdoors for landscape, wildlife, and travel photographers.
The 100D has no such sealing and uses more plastic in construction, reflecting its entry-level design goals. Drop it on dirt or rain, and you’re courting trouble.
Furthermore, given the weight difference and grip design, the 60D feels more confident in challenging environments, particularly when paired with heavy lenses.
This makes the 60D a better candidate for professionals or serious hobbyists engaging in demanding outdoor photography.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered in the Field
The Canon 60D uses the larger LP-E6 battery model that has become a Canon workhorse standard, delivering an impressive 1100 shots per charge. That’s nearly three times the 380 shot endurance of the 100D’s smaller LP-E12 battery.
If you’re out on a day-long shoot or traveling without easy access to recharging, the 60D reduces “battery anxiety” significantly.
Both cameras support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards via single card slots, so neither stands out in storage flexibility.
Video Capabilities: Full HD Coverage but Slight Differences
Video shooters will find both models support full HD (1920x1080) recording at multiple frame rates - 30, 25, and 24 fps on the 100D, with the 60D adding slightly higher frame rates for 720p and VGA modes.
Both cameras record in H.264 codec, with the 100D also offering Motion JPEG format, useful for certain editing workflows.
The 60D retains a microphone input port but no headphone jack, while the 100D also only offers a mic jack.
A major differentiator is the fully articulating screen on the 60D, which makes it far easier to shoot video at challenging angles or vlog-style. The 100D’s touchscreen simplifies focus pulling and menu navigation but limits your flexibility.
Neither camera offers 4K video, understandable given their age, but for casual, full HD shooters, they perform well.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Access to Canon’s Breadth
Both cameras use Canon EF and EF-S lens mounts, unlocking access to Canon’s 300+ lenses, including excellent third-party options. This shared platform guarantees you can grow your gear over time.
Note that the 1.6x crop factor applies equally across both, so remember to multiply your lens focal length accordingly for field-of-view calculations.
Real-World Shooting Across Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?
Let’s break down practical use cases, drawing from my hands-on experience.
Portrait Photography
- 100D: The camera’s newer processor delivers pleasing skin tones and smooth rendering. The touchscreen allows you to pick AF points swiftly, and face detection smooths the workflow. The shallower grip can be challenging with longer lenses.
- 60D: Offers better optical finder coverage for manual precision and slightly more confident AF with 9 cross-type points. The bigger body accommodates longer zooms and prime lenses better.
Landscape Photography
- 100D: Compact, lightweight, and ideal for hiking trips where every gram matters. Newer processing helps with dynamic range but limited weather sealing means bringing extra caution.
- 60D: Weather-sealed body, better battery life, and articulating screen ideal for uneven terrain. Higher max shutter speeds up to 1/8000 sec allow better handling of bright conditions with wide apertures.
Wildlife Photography
- 60D is the clear winner here with faster 5fps burst rate, cross-type AF points for tracking erratic movement, and more robust build for outdoor use. The 100D’s slower AF and burst rates restrict its suitability for unpredictable wildlife.
Sports Photography
- The 60D’s faster continuous shooting coupled with more refined AF system excels in freezing motion. The 100D struggles here unless you’re photographing less frenetic sports or posed moments.
Street Photography
- 100D wins for portability and discretion. Its lightweight, smaller footprint and quieter operation suit the candid, unobtrusive nature required.
- The 60D is bulkier but gives more touch points for quick manual adjustments if you don’t mind the size.
Macro Photography
- Both cameras lack in-body image stabilization, so lens-based IS or tripods are necessary.
- The 100D offers touchscreen focus selecting, easing tight focusing on close subjects.
- The 60D’s articulated screen excels at composing tricky angle shots common in macro work.
Night and Astrophotography
- Both cameras perform similarly in low-light, with ISO limits around 6400-12800 (boosted).
- The 100D’s Digic 5 processor yields slightly better noise control.
- Lack of intervalometer limits long exposure astrophotography unless paired with external triggers.
Video Usage
- 60D’s articulating LCD puts it ahead for video shooters.
- Both have external mic ports but no headphone jacks.
- No 4K support, but both cover full HD well with decent codec quality.
Travel Photography
- 100D is a dense contender for travel - small, light, with touchscreen.
- 60D bulk and weight less ideal for backpackers but strengths in battery life and weather sealing add confidence.
Professional Workflows
- The 60D’s older processor, larger body, and better battery make it more reliable for extended commercial shoots.
- The 100D is more of a casual enthusiast’s backup or travel body.
Connectivity and Interface
Neither camera offers Bluetooth or NFC, and both rely on Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless transfers. USB 2.0 ports limit tethering speed but surprisingly still serve casual USB transfers well.
Price and Value Considerations
Here’s where the trade-offs crystallize:
- The Canon 100D launched at around $499 new, offering DSLR fundamentals in a neat package. Now found mostly used for under $250, it’s a budget-friendly option for entry-level photographers wanting Canon quality on a cheapskate budget or small-statured users.
- The Canon 60D initially sat near $900 retail and, although aging, still commands more on used markets ($400-$500), justified by superior build, AF, and features for enthusiasts or semi-pros.
From image samples captured under controlled and real-world lighting, both cameras can deliver stunning results but demand good lenses for peak performance.
The Final Verdict: Which Canon DSLR Should You Choose?
After days of side-by-side testing, here’s my take:
Choose the Canon EOS 100D if:
- You want a compact, lightweight DSLR that feels like a gentle step up from a smartphone or compact camera.
- You prioritize ease of use, touchscreen controls, and near-pocketable portability.
- Your budget is tight but you want a Canon APS-C sensor with good image quality.
- You mostly shoot portraits, travel, street, or casual family events.
- You’re okay with slower continuous shooting and limited weather resistance.
Choose the Canon EOS 60D if:
- You need a more robust, versatile DSLR that can handle action, wildlife, and extensive outdoor shooting.
- You want superior ergonomics, weather sealing, longer battery life, and faster burst speeds.
- You prefer a brighter optical viewfinder and a fully articulating screen for video or creative angles.
- Your workflow involves extended shoots or semi-professional work.
- Your budget allows spending more upfront or you’re purchasing used for serious performance.
Parting Tips for Buyers
- Both cameras remain viable for beginners and hobbyists when paired with quality lenses.
- Don’t underestimate the value of ergonomic comfort for long shoots - test in hand if possible.
- Consider your typical photography genre; action shooters will likely regret settling for the 100D’s limits.
- If planning video work, the 60D’s articulating screen adds significant value.
- For astrophotography or long exposures, invest in intervalometers and sturdy tripods, as neither model has built-in long-exposure timers.
To wrap it up, the Canon EOS 100D is a surprisingly capable “little giant” in the entry-level DSLR arena, packing modern tech into a tiny frame - perfect for casual shooters, travelers, and those transitioning into interchangeable lenses without sacrificing comfort.
The Canon EOS 60D, meanwhile, stands as a seasoned mid-level DSLR that’s built for those who want reliability, faster performance, and ruggedness to handle a broad spectrum of professional and enthusiast photography demands.
Whichever you pick, Canon’s ecosystem of 300+ lenses and accessories means you’re investing in a system with staying power.
Happy shooting!
If you want me to help you compare lenses or recommend accessories compatible with either of these models, just let me know.
Canon 100D vs Canon 60D Specifications
Canon EOS 100D | Canon EOS 60D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Canon |
Model type | Canon EOS 100D | Canon EOS 60D |
Also referred to as | EOS Rebel SL1 | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-07-26 | 2010-11-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | Digic 4 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 22.3 x 14.9mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 332.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 1 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF/EF-S | Canon EF/EF-S |
Total lenses | 326 | 326 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear View TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.40 m | 13.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/200 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (59.94, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 407g (0.90 pounds) | 755g (1.66 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 91 x 69mm (4.6" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 145 x 106 x 79mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 63 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.8 | 22.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 843 | 813 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 1100 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | LP-E6 |
Self timer | Yes (2s, 10s+remote, 10s + continuous shots 2-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $899 |