Canon EOS 1100D vs Canon EOS 1200D - The Entry-Level DSLR Showdown

When stepping into DSLR photography, the choice between slightly older and newer entry-level models can feel like a minefield. I’ve spent countless hours hands-on with Canon’s EOS 1100D and 1200D - two compact SLRs separated by a three-year manufacturing gap but with surprisingly nuanced differences under the hood. This is a detailed, expert-level comparison for photography enthusiasts and professionals who want to understand how these cameras really perform daily, across genres and scenarios.

We break down the technical distinctions, real-world handling, and creative potential to help you judge which one fits your photographic ambitions and budget - no hype, just honest assessments.

First Impressions & Build: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls

Right from the start, both the Canon 1100D and 1200D maintain Canon’s signature compact SLR design, making them approachable for beginners while offering solid control layouts.

At 130 x 100 x 78 mm physical dimensions, they share almost the exact footprint, but subtle feel differences arise from the slight weight variation: 495g for the 1100D and 480g for the 1200D. That 15g difference is hardly noticed during handheld shooting, though the 1200D’s body feels marginally rounded in areas that contribute to improved grip comfort in prolonged shoots.

Looking at the top design through our comparison image -

the control layout hasn’t dramatically changed, sticking to the tried-and-tested mode dial, shutter release, and exposure controls. The 1200D does introduce marginally refreshed tactile buttons with a sturdier feel but no illuminated buttons still (something I quite appreciate in newer models).

Both use Canon’s EF/EF-S lens mount, so there’s no hesitation about lens compatibility - a massive plus for beginners upgrading from kits or older bodies.

Under the Hood: Sensor, Processor, and Image Quality

This is where the 1200D pulls ahead meaningfully, but the improvements warrant your consideration for your shooting style.

Both cameras utilize Canon’s DIGIC 4 image processor, which, while dated compared to modern powerhouses, remains competent for entry-level photography. However, the sensor tech tells a different story:

Canon 1100D Sensor:

• APS-C CMOS (22.2 x 14.8 mm)
• 12MP resolution (4272 x 2848)
• Native ISO 100–6400
• DxOmark Overall Score: 62
• DxO Color Depth: 21.9 bits
• Dynamic Range: 11.0 EV
• Low Light ISO: 755

Canon 1200D Sensor:

• APS-C CMOS (22.3 x 14.9 mm, marginally larger sensor area)
• 18MP resolution (5184 x 3456)
• Native ISO 100–6400 (Extended to 12800)
• DxOmark Overall Score: 63
• DxO Color Depth: 21.9 bits
• Dynamic Range: 11.3 EV
• Low Light ISO: 724

The 1200D sports a noticeable bump in resolution - 18 megapixels compared to the 1100D’s 12. That translates into more image detail, allowing for larger prints or tighter cropping - important for landscape and studio portrait shooters. The dynamic range is slightly better as well, which means the 1200D can hold more detail in highlights and shadows - a big advantage for outdoor or high-contrast scenes.

However, the 1100D scores marginally better for low-light ISO, which surprised me given the newer sensor. The difference is almost negligible in practice - with both cameras struggle above ISO 1600, where noise is more noticeable.

While shooting portraits under mixed light, I found skin tones from both models warm and natural, with the 1200D’s higher resolution offering more subtle gradation. For wildlife or sports, the 18MP sensor does slightly edge out for crop zooming.

Display and Interface: Better Viewing Experience on the 1200D

Both cameras feature an optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.5x magnification - not stellar but acceptable for entry-level DSLRs. What sets them apart is the rear LCD:

The 1100D has a 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD with 230k dots, whereas the 1200D ups the ante to a 3.0-inch screen with 460k dots. This larger, higher resolution screen makes a clear difference for live view shooting and menu navigation. While neither is a touchscreen, the improved screen clarity on the 1200D makes previewing images and manual focusing easier.

I tested both cameras’ live view autofocus and found the contrast-detection AF somewhat sluggish compared to modern mirrorless cameras, but the 1200D’s sharper display helped me compose more confidently.

Autofocus System: Nine Focus Points, But Which is Faster?

Autofocus is the backbone of DSLR usability, especially for action, wildlife, and street photography.

Both cameras feature identical 9-point phase-detection AF systems with one cross-type point in the center. This setup was standard in entry-level models at the time but is very limited by today’s standards.

Sadly, neither supports advanced tracking, eye-detection, or animal AF technologies, which limits their usefulness in dynamic scenes.

In practical shooting, tracking moving subjects with the 1100D was noticeably slower and less reliable, especially under lower light. The 1200D, while not revolutionary, offers slightly quicker AF acquisition and improved accuracy in live view due to processor optimizations.

While 3 fps continuous shooting might sound slow, these cameras suit beginner photographers prioritizing image quality over sheer action capture speed.

Image Stabilization: No In-Body Stabilization - Lens Choice is Critical

Neither camera possesses in-body image stabilization (IBIS), which places the onus on using stabilized lenses (Canon’s IS series). For handheld shooting, this is crucial - especially in low light and macro work.

Fortunately, Canon’s EF/EF-S ecosystem boasts an extensive selection of lenses with optical stabilization. For those considering these cameras, investing in an IS lens is highly advisable.

Burst Rates and Performance in Action Photography

The maximum continuous shooting speed for both the 1100D and 1200D is 3.0 frames per second (fps) - modest by modern standards but typical for entry-level DSLRs of their generation.

This frame rate allows for casual sports or wildlife shooting but will struggle with fast-paced action or rapidly changing scenes.

I recommend photographers focusing extensively on sports to consider higher-end models with 7-10 fps or greater, but for occasional bursts, both cameras perform acceptably.

Video Capabilities - A Clear Winner for the 1200D

Video in entry-level DSLRs has evolved rapidly, and here the 1200D clearly outpaces its predecessor.

• Canon 1100D Video: Up to 720p (1280x720) at 30fps, H.264 and Motion JPEG formats, no microphone input.
• Canon 1200D Video: Full HD 1080p (1920x1080) at 30fps, H.264 format, still no microphone input.

While neither camera offers 4K or professional-grade video features, the 1200D’s Full HD recording is a significant step forward for casual videographers and vloggers.

However, the lack of microphone input on both limits serious audio recording capabilities - this is a constraint for content creators seeking higher fidelity.

Stabilization in video is not offered by the bodies, so again, a lens with optical IS is recommended for smoother footage during handheld recording.

Battery Life and Storage - Surprising Practicalities

The 1100D boasts an impressive rated battery life of 700 shots per charge, whereas the 1200D, despite being newer, offers around 500 shots. These differences largely stem from the larger, brighter LCD and processor demands in the latter.

With real-world testing, these figures are realistic; you can expect the 1100D to last longer on a single charge, which could matter for travel or extended shoots with limited charging options.

Storage wise, both use one SD card slot supporting SD, SDHC, and SDXC formats - no surprises here, but at least full compatibility with modern fast cards.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Neither camera features modern Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS built-in. The 1100D supports Eye-Fi wireless SD cards for image transfer - an option that was popular during its release but is less relevant given today’s wireless solutions.

The 1200D effectively lacks wireless connectivity, which is unusual for its release year (2014), limiting remote shooting or instant sharing options.

Photographers seeking integrated Wi-Fi for mobile workflows should look elsewhere in the Canon lineup or mirrorless rivals.

Durability, Weather Sealing, and Field Reliability

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dust, freeze, shock, or crush resistance. At the entry level, this omission is understandable, but photographers who shoot outdoors or under harsh conditions should be cautious.

Build quality is solid plastic with good fit, typical for these classes. The 1200D edges the feeling of durability despite similar dimensions and materials, likely thanks to improved internal design and finishing.

Using These Cameras Across Photography Genres

No camera exists in a vacuum; understanding how these two fare in specific genres is paramount.

Portrait Photography

Skin tone rendering and bokeh quality depend heavily on sensor and lens pairing.

• 1100D: 12MP resolution limits cropping but delivers pleasing color. 9-point AF with face detection aids composition but no eye AF.
• 1200D: 18MP sensor offers more detail, flexibility, and slightly improved dynamic range - great for studio portraits and casual environmental portraits.

Neither supports eye-detection AF, so manual finesse is needed when shooting wide apertures (f/1.8-2.8) for creamy bokeh.

Landscape Photography

Here, resolution and dynamic range shine.

• The 1200D’s 18MP sensor and 11.3 EV dynamic range make it preferable for-rich detail and highlight retention.
• The 1100D’s slightly lower spec means less latitude in post-processing.

Keep in mind no weather sealing on either, so landscape shooters in rugged environments must plan accordingly.

Wildlife Photography

Autofocus speed and burst rate are pivotal.

• Both cameras’ 3 fps continuous burst and limited 9-point AF restrict their usefulness.
• The 1200D’s higher resolution sensor gives the advantage of cropping.

In my field tests photographing birds, I found the AF sluggish and prone to hunting in low-contrast conditions on both.

Sports Photography

Again, autofocus and frame rate bottleneck performance.

• Neither camera is designed for high-speed tracking.
• Manual anticipation and focus techniques are needed.

Street Photography

Portability and discretion are key here.

Both bodies are similarly compact but not pocketable. Their busy dials and audible mirror slap could attract attention. That said, excellent image quality at base ISO makes them viable.

Macro Photography

Both lack focus stacking and focus bracketing but can deliver sharp macro shots when paired with dedicated lenses.

Lack of in-body stabilization means tripod or lens IS is a must for steady handheld close-up work.

Night & Astro Photography

Limited by sensor noise floor and no bulb timer mode.

• 1100D and 1200D struggle above ISO 1600.
• Both can do 30-second exposures.

Lower pixel count on 1100D yields slightly better noise performance, a nod for astro enthusiasts who prioritize cleaner images over resolution.

Video Use

Clear advantage to 1200D for Full HD.

Neither offers advanced video features, limiting to casual or entry vlogging.

Sample Image Gallery

Let’s put theory into practice with actual photographs from both cameras under comparable conditions.

Canon 1100D screen back Canon 1200D screen back

Notice the improved fine detail, chromatic rendition, and dynamic range on the 1200D samples. The 1100D still holds up well for clean, natural images but lacks the punch and flexibility found in the newer sensor.

Final Scores & Overall Assessment

Our measurements and hands-on reviews yield the following performance ratings:

Both cameras earn respectable scores for entry-level gear, but the 1200D nudges ahead by a slight margin owing to its sensor and video upgrades.

Which One Should You Choose? Tailored Recommendations

Choose the Canon EOS 1100D if:

• You’re on a tight budget and want a capable DSLR for basic photography.
• You prefer longer battery life for extended shooting.
• Low light noise performance at ISO 1600 or below is a priority.
• You don’t need Full HD video or a high-resolution screen.
• Access to cheap used body deals matters.

Opt for the Canon EOS 1200D if:

• You want higher resolution files for cropping, large prints, or detailed work.
• Full HD video recording is important.
• You appreciate a larger, sharper LCD for live view and menu navigation.
• You are willing to accept shorter battery life.
• You want a better all-around sensor with higher dynamic range.

In Closing - Honest Thoughts from the Lab and Field

After personally side-by-side testing these two Canon DSLRs, I see the 1200D as a worthy evolution rather than a revolution. It builds on the 1100D’s solid foundation with refined imaging capabilities and user experience enhancements that matter in daily photography, especially for those seeking more pixels and video prowess.

Neither camera will satisfy advanced users craving speedy AF, high burst rates, or professional video, but for entry-level photographers focusing on portraits, landscapes, or travel, they remain solid options in the used market.

Interested in ergonomic comfort, battery life, or ultimate budget constraints? The 1100D still holds value. Want more detail, better video, and a leg up for future growth? The 1200D is your pick.

In the end, both cameras represent Canon’s approachable gateways into DSLR photography - affordable, dependable, and full of potential in the hands of patient learners and hobbyists.

I hope this exploration offers clarity and practical insight to your camera decision-making journey. Don’t hesitate to reach out if you want deeper analysis or advice on lenses and accessories for either model.

Safe shooting!