Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9
59 Imaging
46 Features
39 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfaa4/cfaa49b9347d728100569265689f10fa0dab3c94" alt="Canon EOS 20Da front Canon EOS 20Da front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 770g - 144 x 106 x 72mm
- Introduced June 2005
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon 20Da versus Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by brands Canon and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the 20Da (8MP) and SD9 (3MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The 20Da was announced 2 years after the SD9 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the 20Da grades against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS 20Da and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon 20Da Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 20Da over the Sigma SD9
20Da | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2005 | ![]() | November 2002 | More modern by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Canon 20Da
SD9 | 20Da | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 130k | ![]() | 118k | Crisper screen (+12k dot) |
Common features in the Canon 20Da and Sigma SD9
20Da | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 1.8" | ![]() | 1.8" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon 20Da has physical measurements of 144mm x 106mm x 72mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 770 grams (1.70 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Canon 20Da versus Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the 20Da against the SD9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/942ba/942ba11fa9c63cadf5bb1b3ce66bf41aaf47b8fd" alt="Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 20Da and SD9 is 59 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8beb/d8beb4a0e7c17b6db0ed5c20c0eb66ac18ca006c" alt="Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison"
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 20Da and SD9.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon 20Da to offer you extra detail with its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern 20Da should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56a55/56a5597d3b44549d77494d1fd869f3c551091859" alt="Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison"
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04f95/04f95dcae2d8da05412007618e397ba82b468dc2" alt="Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon 20Da vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Canon EOS 20Da | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Sigma |
Model | Canon EOS 20Da | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2005-06-01 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 22.5 x 15mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 337.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3504 x 2336 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF/EF-S | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 326 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 1.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 118 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 770 grams (1.70 lb) | 950 grams (2.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 106 x 72mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 2.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,499 | $3,001 |