Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420
63 Imaging
43 Features
33 Overall
39
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 645g - 142 x 99 x 72mm
- Announced September 2003
- Additionally Known as EOS Digital Rebel / EOS Kiss Digital
- Refreshed by Canon 350D
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Canon 300D and Olympus E-420, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the 300D (6MP) and E-420 (10MP) and the 300D (APS-C) and E-420 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 300D was manufactured 5 years earlier than the E-420 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the 300D matches up vs the E-420 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS 300D and Olympus E-420. The entire galleries are available at Canon 300D Gallery and Olympus E-420 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 300D over the Olympus E-420
300D | E-420 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Canon 300D
E-420 | 300D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2008 | September 2003 | Newer by 58 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 118k | Clearer display (+112k dot) |
Common features in the Canon 300D and Olympus E-420
300D | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon 300D has got external dimensions of 142mm x 99mm x 72mm (5.6" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 645 grams (1.42 lbs) and the Olympus E-420 has dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Canon 300D and Olympus E-420 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the 300D and the E-420.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 300D and E-420 is 63 and 77 respectively.
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The pic here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 300D and E-420.
All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 300D featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-420 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged 300D is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-420 Specifications
Canon EOS 300D | Olympus E-420 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS 300D | Olympus E-420 |
Alternate name | EOS Digital Rebel / EOS Kiss Digital | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2003-09-04 | 2008-06-23 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.7 x 15.1mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 342.8mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3072 x 2048 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 326 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 118k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | None |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 645 gr (1.42 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 99 x 72mm (5.6" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 544 | 527 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $54 | $999 |