Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520
63 Imaging
43 Features
33 Overall
39
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 645g - 142 x 99 x 72mm
- Announced September 2003
- Other Name is EOS Digital Rebel / EOS Kiss Digital
- Renewed by Canon 350D
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Canon 300D versus Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the 300D (6MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the 300D (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 300D was unveiled 6 years earlier than the E-520 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the 300D scores vs the E-520 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS 300D & Olympus E-520. The full galleries are available at Canon 300D Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 300D over the Olympus E-520
| 300D | E-520 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon 300D
| E-520 | 300D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2008 |  | September 2003 | Newer by 60 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 118k | Clearer screen (+112k dot) |
Common features in the Canon 300D and Olympus E-520
| 300D | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon 300D offers exterior measurements of 142mm x 99mm x 72mm (5.6" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 645 grams (1.42 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-520 has dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Check the Canon 300D versus Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 300D against the E-520.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 300D and E-520 is 63 and 68 respectively.
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 300D and E-520.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 300D having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-520 will offer you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged 300D is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon 300D vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Canon EOS 300D | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon EOS 300D | Olympus E-520 |
| Also called | EOS Digital Rebel / EOS Kiss Digital | - |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2003-09-04 | 2008-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.7 x 15.1mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 342.8mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3072 x 2048 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 326 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 118k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 645 gr (1.42 lbs) | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 99 x 72mm (5.6" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.8 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 544 | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $54 | $400 |
