Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520
69 Imaging
48 Features
33 Overall
42
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 556g - 127 x 94 x 65mm
- Launched October 2006
- Alternate Name is EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X
- Succeeded the Canon 350D
- Refreshed by Canon 450D
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the 400D (10MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is very comparable but the 400D (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 400D was announced 22 months prior to the E-520 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 400D matches up against the E-520 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS 400D & Olympus E-520. The whole galleries are provided at Canon 400D Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 400D over the Olympus E-520
| 400D | E-520 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon 400D
| E-520 | 400D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2008 |  | October 2006 | Newer by 22 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon 400D and Olympus E-520
| 400D | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Canon 400D offers outer measurements of 127mm x 94mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 556 grams (1.23 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-520 has specifications of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Compare the Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the 400D vs the E-520.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the 400D and E-520 is 69 and 68 respectively.
Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 400D and E-520.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The 400D uses the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The more aged 400D will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon 400D vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Canon EOS 400D | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon EOS 400D | Olympus E-520 |
| Otherwise known as | EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X | - |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2006-10-14 | 2008-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.2 x 14.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 328.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3888 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 326 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/200 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 556 grams (1.23 pounds) | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 127 x 94 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 62 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 664 | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $600 | $400 |