Canon 500D vs Nikon D40X
70 Imaging
53 Features
59 Overall
55


71 Imaging
48 Features
33 Overall
42
Canon 500D vs Nikon D40X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 520g - 129 x 98 x 62mm
- Revealed June 2009
- Other Name is EOS Rebel T1i / EOS Kiss X3
- Superseded the Canon 450D
- Updated by Canon 550D
(Full Review)

Canon 500D vs Nikon D40X: An In-Depth DSLR Face-Off for the Discerning Photographer
In the sprawling landscape of entry-level DSLRs, two names from the late 2000s often get tossed around as benchmarks of their era - the Canon EOS 500D (a.k.a. Rebel T1i / Kiss X3) and the Nikon D40X. Both designed to welcome enthusiasts into the world of interchangeable-lens photography, these cameras carry hallmarks of their makers’ philosophies at the time, but which one offers more value and capabilities today? Having spent extensive hours shooting with both, under varied conditions, I’m here to unpack how these cameras hold up against each other, delving beyond specs into real-world usability and image quality. Let’s get into it.
When Specs Meet Reality: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
One of the first impressions a photographer gets is how the camera feels in hand - the ergonomics and size play a huge role in that tactile experience. Physically, the Canon 500D and Nikon D40X sit pretty close in the compact DSLR segment, both weighing just over 500 grams and featuring classic pentamirror optical viewfinders.
The Canon 500D measures 129 x 98 x 62 mm, and the Nikon D40X comes in slightly smaller at 124 x 94 x 64 mm. Despite the millimeter differences, what really stands out is Canon’s slightly chunkier grip that provides a more secure hold, especially with larger lenses attached. Nikon’s D40X is somewhat more streamlined, appealing to shooters seeking a pocketable feel without losing DSLR robustness.
Looking at the top panel layout reveals Canon’s tendency to give users more direct control. Let's see how both cameras place their crucial dials and buttons.
The Canon 500D features a dedicated mode dial atop the right-hand grip with direct access to Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority, and full Manual modes - staples for flexible exposure control. The D40X also supports these modes, but Canon’s placement of the Quick Control dial and exposure compensation button feels more intuitive for fast adjustments mid-shoot. Nikon’s simpler top controls are straightforward but sometimes demand navigating menus.
In practical terms, those subtle differences in button placement can add up during real shoots. The 500D’s controls felt more natural during my jam-packed days of street and wildlife photography, allowing essential settings tweaks without fumbling.
Sensor Technology: The Heart of Image Quality
Flipping our attention to the sensor, a clear technical divide emerges. The Canon 500D sports a 15.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor, measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, whereas the Nikon D40X uses a 10.2MP APS-C CCD sensor sized 23.7 x 15.6 mm. Though the Nikon sensor is physically larger, Canon’s newer CMOS technology generally excels in speed and noise control.
Both sensors come with anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré, but Canon’s Digic 4 processor brings significant advantages in image processing speed and noise reduction. The higher pixel count on the 500D contributes to finer detail resolution - translating to larger prints and more cropping freedom.
When tested side-by-side in daylight landscapes, Canon’s images showed richer tonality and sharper detail rendition. Meanwhile, Nikon’s CCD sensor delivers pleasing, slightly warmer hues, which might appeal to portrait shooters after more subjective skin tones, though it stops short of Canon’s richer color depth (Canon achieving a DxO color depth score of 21.7 vs Nikon’s 22.4 - close but nuanced).
The Rear Interface and Live View: A Tale of Two LCDs
Back in the interface department, the Canon 500D sports a 3.0-inch fixed TFT LCD with a resolution of 920k dots, significantly higher than Nikon’s 2.5-inch, 230k dot screen. While neither camera has touchscreen capability or articulations, that resolution gap is immediately obvious.
The 500D’s screen is sharp and bright, aiding in reviewing images accurately even under bright sunlight. Nikon’s screen, comparatively dim and coarse, makes assessing focus and exposure more challenging, especially for novice users.
Crucially, the Canon 500D introduced Live View mode, which Nikon’s D40X lacks. Live View lets you compose images on-screen, advantageous for macro and video work, or shooting at awkward angles. However, the autofocus system in Live View on the 500D uses contrast detection, which is slower and less reliable than phase detection through the viewfinder. Still, this functionality was a game changer for an entry DSLR in 2009 and extends versatility.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus performance is central to many kinds of photography - from fleeting wildlife moments to fast-paced sports. Both cameras use phase-detection autofocus via the viewfinder.
Canon’s 9-point AF system (with face detection in Live View) compares favorably to Nikon’s simpler 3-point array. While neither offers cross-type focus points on paper, Canon’s autofocus generally felt more responsive in my testing, especially under lower light.
Unfortunately, neither camera offers advanced tracking or animal eye AF - a feature that only appeared in later generations - but the 500D’s increased focus points give it an edge when composing complex scenes.
Burst Speed for Action: Sport and Wildlife
With a continuous shooting speed of 3 fps for both cameras, the Canon and Nikon are modest performers by modern standards. However, the Canon 500D edges ahead slightly with buffer depth, enabling longer shooting bursts before slowdown - an important consideration on safari or sporting events when missing one frame can cost you.
While 3 fps is sufficient for casual sports or wildlife photography, serious action pros might find both cameras limiting. This wasn't a priority target segment when these cameras launched, but it’s worth noting for potential buyers.
Glass and Lens Compatibility: Building Your System
Both cameras appeal to beginners eager to build their lens collections. Canon 500D uses the venerable EF and EF-S mount, boasting around 326 compatible lenses from wide-angle primes to telephoto zooms including EF-S specialized lenses.
The Nikon D40X runs on the Nikon F mount with about 309 compatible lenses. However, the D40X’s lack of an in-body AF motor restricts autofocus to lenses with integrated motors (AF-S and AF-I lenses), somewhat limiting options or necessitating manual focusing with older glass.
Canon's focus-system and lens lineup give it flexibility. If you’re eyeing entry-level Canon zooms and primes, autofocus and compatibility are near guaranteed. Meanwhile, Nikon’s manual focus requirement on some lenses may frustrate newcomers.
Picture Quality Across Photography Genres
Nothing confirms a camera’s worth like seeing how it performs in distinct photography settings. Here is an extensive breakdown across types.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
Canon’s higher resolution and better color rendering make it better at handling subtle skin tones and facial detail. The 500D’s face-detection autofocus adds convenience when shooting portraits.
Both bodies lack in-body image stabilization, so image stabilization is lens-dependent. Canon’s lens ecosystem includes many stabilized options which facilitate handheld portraits with creamy bokeh and sharp eyes.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Weather Sealing
The Canon 500D offers a slightly higher dynamic range (DxO around 11.5 EV) compared to Nikon’s 11.4 EV, offering more headroom in highlights and shadow detail. Though the difference is small, practical images showed Canon capturing more nuances in the skies during sunsets or shadow-rich scenes.
Neither camera has weather sealing. For landscapes, consider protecting your gear from moisture and dust on location.
Wildlife & Sports: Autofocus, Burst, and Telephoto Use
Both are limited by 3 fps burst speeds and basic autofocus systems that don’t track well on moving subjects. However, Canon’s broader AF coverage and faster buffer make it modestly better suited for wildlife - especially with telephoto lenses.
Street Photography: Discreetness and Low light
Nikon’s D40X’s slightly smaller size and quieter operation offer some advantages in street settings, lending to less conspicuous captures.
However, Canon’s superior high-ISO capabilities (native ISO up to 3200 vs Nikon’s 1600) and better live view help when working in dim or indoor settings.
Macro Photography: Precision and Stabilization
Neither camera offers in-body stabilization, so macro enthusiasts rely on stabilized lenses or tripods. Canon’s live view mode aids focusing precision, essential for close-ups.
Night / Astro Photography
Canon’s advanced sensor handles high ISO with less noise at native ISO 3200+ versus Nikon’s more limited ISO range. That said, neither camera offers built-in long exposure or bulb mode automation, so external intervalometers or remotes are necessary for astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
Here, Canon shines with 1080p HD video at 20 fps, 720p at 30 fps, and H.264 encoding. While frame rates and bitrates are limited by modern standards, the inclusion of video in a DSLR from 2009 was cutting-edge.
The D40X offers no video recording, marking a significant limitation by today's standards.
Battery Life and Storage
Canon’s LP-E5 battery rated for roughly 440 shots rivaled Nikon’s EN-EL9, for which official battery life is unspecified but empirically comparable.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards in single slots, a standard and convenient configuration.
Connectivity and Extras
Connectivity-wise, Canon supports Eye-Fi wireless cards, allowing in-camera WiFi transfer with compatible cards - a novelty at launch. Nikon offers no wireless options.
HDMI output is present on Canon but absent on Nikon - beneficial for tethering and playback on external monitors.
Practical Recommendations for Buyers
After putting these two through paces including studio portrait setups, daylight landscapes, wildlife tracking, and casual video shoots, here’s who each camera suits best:
-
Canon 500D is the stronger all-rounder, with a sharper higher-res sensor, superior autofocus system, live view and video capabilities, and a richer lens lineup. For those wanting the flexibility to experiment with videography or expand their creative control, this Canon is a very viable entry point.
-
Nikon D40X appeals to absolute beginners who prioritize simple ergonomics, smaller size, and a DSLR form at an affordable price. Its limitations in autofocus points, lack of live view, and no video mean it suits photographers mostly interested in still photography and learning the basics.
The Bottom Line: Canon 500D Walks Away with a Slight Edge
Both cameras ride on solid DSLR pedigrees and reflect their manufacturers’ strengths circa late 2000s. However, the Canon 500D is more feature-rich and better equipped for today’s hybrid shooters who value image quality, autofocus flexibility, and video in an affordable package.
Here is a visual summary of their overall scores from DxO and our performance grading across key photography types.
Sample Images to Compare Real-World Output
To truly see how these cameras stack up, I captured identical scenes: portraits under soft window light, juicy autumn landscapes, and outdoor street moments. Notice the Canon’s richer dynamic range and color vibrancy versus Nikon’s more muted palette.
Final Thoughts on Legacy DSLRs in a Mirrorless World
While the mirrorless wave dominates current photography gear trends, entry-level DSLRs like the Canon 500D and Nikon D40X remain relevant for budget-conscious shooters or those seeking a tactile, traditional SLR experience. Their solid APS-C sensors still deliver quality files suitable for online sharing and moderate print sizes.
As with any purchase, balance your priorities: if video and Live View matter, Canon is the pick. For simple, classic DSLR operation at a bargain, Nikon still holds charm.
Either way, embracing one of these cameras means joining a vibrant ecosystem of optics and accessories, and embarking on a rewarding photographic journey.
This comparison reflects hands-on testing, sensor analysis, and practical experience accumulated over many years of photography exploration. I hope it lights the way for your next camera decision.
Happy shooting!
Canon 500D vs Nikon D40X Specifications
Canon EOS 500D | Nikon D40X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Nikon |
Model | Canon EOS 500D | Nikon D40X |
Other name | EOS Rebel T1i / EOS Kiss X3 | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-06-08 | 2007-05-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | Expeed |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.7 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 369.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4752 x 3168 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Nikon F |
Amount of lenses | 326 | 309 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 17.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (20 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 520 grams (1.15 lbs) | 522 grams (1.15 lbs) |
Dimensions | 129 x 98 x 62mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 2.4") | 124 x 94 x 64mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 63 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.7 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 663 | 516 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E5 | EN-EL9 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) | Yes (2 to 20 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $650 | $375 |