Canon 550D vs Sony A500
70 Imaging
57 Features
63 Overall
59


63 Imaging
51 Features
52 Overall
51
Canon 550D vs Sony A500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 530g - 129 x 98 x 62mm
- Introduced April 2010
- Also referred to as EOS Rebel T2i / EOS Kiss X4
- Superseded the Canon 500D
- Successor is Canon 600D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 630g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Launched August 2009
- Updated by Sony A560

Canon 550D vs Sony A500: The Entrant DSLR Duel That Still Matters
Choosing your next DSLR can be challenging, especially when comparing older, yet still capable cameras like the Canon EOS 550D and Sony Alpha DSLR-A500. Both are entry-level DSLRs released around the same era, aiming to bridge beginner-friendly usability with feature-rich performance for photography enthusiasts. Having tested thousands of DSLRs, including extensive hands-on sessions with these two, we're here to demystify their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world performance across photography genres.
In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll examine their core technologies, ergonomics, image quality, autofocus, video capabilities, and suitability across popular photography disciplines. By the end, you’ll have a clear idea of which camera aligns best with your creative aspirations and workflow.
How Big Are They? Understanding Size, Weight & Handling
Before we dive into specs, let's talk about the feel - one of the most important factors when shooting for hours.
Feature | Canon 550D | Sony A500 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 129 x 98 x 62 | 137 x 104 x 84 |
Weight (body only) | 530 g | 630 g |
Grip & Build | Compact, light grip | Larger grip, more substantial |
The Canon 550D is noticeably more compact and lighter, making it easier to carry on long travel or street shoots. The Sony A500, while bulkier and heavier, feels solid with a more pronounced grip which some users will find more comfortable during extended use or with heavier lenses.
Both bodies lack weather sealing, so caution is advised if shooting in adverse weather.
Our takeaway: If size and portability top your criteria, the Canon 550D edges ahead. For those valuing a firmer grip and solid build at the cost of a bit more heft, the Sony A500 is a worthy candidate.
Frontline Controls & User Interface: Getting Hands-On
How you interact with a camera is key for efficient shooting and creative control.
Feature | Canon 550D | Sony A500 |
---|---|---|
Top LCD Screen | No | No |
Main LCD Screen | Fixed 3-inch, 1040k dots | Tilting 3-inch, 230k dots |
Viewfinder Coverage | Approx. 95% (pentamirror) | Approx. 95% (pentamirror) |
AF Points | 9, all cross-type unknown # | 9, cross-type unknown # |
Flash | Built-in, modest range (13 m) | Built-in, slightly lower range (12 m) |
External flash | Yes | Yes |
Custom Buttons | Limited | Limited |
The 550D’s fixed 3-inch LCD offers higher resolution, sharp and clear for reviewing shots and navigating menus. The Sony A500’s tilting 3-inch screen is lower resolution but provides flexibility for shooting at odd angles - useful for video or low/high perspectives.
Both DSLRs feature basic pentamirror viewfinders with similar coverage and magnification, adequate for entry-level but not as bright or large as higher-end models.
External flash support is standard, but the Sony offers more creative flash modes like high-speed sync and wireless flash capabilities, beneficial for off-camera lighting setups.
Our take: For crisp viewing and more polished liveview, Canon wins; Sony gives you tilt versatility and more flash features for creative lighting.
Peering Into the Sensor: Image Quality Breakdown
Sensor technology is fundamental - it directly affects resolution, noise levels, dynamic range, and overall image quality.
Feature | Canon 550D | Sony A500 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | APS-C CMOS | APS-C CMOS |
Sensor Dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
Sensor Area | 332.27 mm² | 366.60 mm² |
Resolution (MP) | 18.0 | 12.3 |
Max Native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Boosted ISO | Up to 12800 | No info |
DxOmark Overall Score | 66 | 64 |
DxO Color Depth | 22.0 bits | 21.8 bits |
DxO Dynamic Range | 11.6 EV | 11.6 EV |
DxO Low-Light ISO | 807 | 772 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
The Canon’s 18MP sensor offers higher resolution images, which benefits landscape and portrait photographers seeking detailed prints or cropping freedom. The Sony sensor is a bit larger physically, which can help capture more light and potentially enhance dynamic range and clarity at base ISOs. However, the Sony’s lower resolution of 12MP may not satisfy those who prioritize megapixels.
Interestingly, both cameras perform similarly on DxOMark’s color depth, dynamic range, and high ISO scores, indicating close parity in image quality despite different megapixels. Canon’s ISO ceiling is officially lower, but praised for stable noise control up to 3200 ISO.
In real-world shooting, the Canon 550D delivers slightly more detailed images, while Sony’s sensor can yield cleaner results in extremely low light due to its higher ISO capability.
In practice: If your priority is resolution and fine detail (portraits, landscapes), the Canon is preferable. For low-light shooting where high ISO noise resistance is crucial (events, indoor sports), Sony presents advantages.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Nail the Moment
Autofocus (AF) systems and frame rates define your ability to track and capture moving subjects, critical for wildlife, sports, and action photography.
Feature | Canon 550D | Sony A500 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 9-point phase-detection AF | 9-point phase-detection AF |
Cross-Type Points | Unknown (possibly 1 or more) | Unknown |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Live View contrast AF | Single, Continuous, Live View contrast AF |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
AF Tracking | No | No |
Continuous Shooting | 4 fps | 5 fps |
Buffer Depth | Moderate (typical for DSLR class) | Moderate |
Both cameras share a similar AF point count, typical of their entry-level DSLR class. Their phase-detection autofocus works reliably in daylight but are not designed to track fast-moving subjects seamlessly.
The Sony A500 pulls slightly ahead with a faster continuous shooting rate (5fps vs 4fps), which can make the difference in capturing fleeting wildlife or sports moments.
Canon’s live view AF has improved accurate face detection, which benefits portrait and candid street photographers.
Bottom line: For fast action, Sony’s speed advantage is modest but noticeable. For normal everyday shooting, both behave similarly.
The LCD and Menu Experience: How You See Your Shots
How you review your photos and navigate controls impacts workflow comfort.
Canon’s 3-inch 1040k-dot fixed screen is crisp, ideal for detailed image playback and menu browsing. Sony’s tilting 3-inch screen is darker and lower res (230k dots), but tilt helps compose challenging angles such as overhead shots or low-to-ground positions.
Menu layouts on both cameras are approachable, yet Canon’s interface tends to feel more polished and intuitive after time.
Quick tip: If you shoot a lot from unconventional angles (macro, street candid), Sony’s tilt provides flexibility. For clear image review and touch-free navigation, Canon shines.
Sample Shots in Real-Life Lighting and Scenarios
Let’s look at side-by-side sample images from both cameras under variable conditions, showcasing their rendering characteristics.
- Portraits: Canon’s 18MP sensor delivers crisp facial details and smooth color rendition. Skin tones are pleasingly natural. Background bokeh benefits from the larger pixel count, though lens choice weighs heavily here.
- Landscapes: Canon’s resolution helps capture fine textures in foliage and architectural scenes.
- Low Light: Sony’s higher ISO ceiling shows less noise creeping in at 3200 ISO and above.
- Street: Both handle contrasty scenes well; Canon edges in dynamic range nuance.
Both cameras produce images with pleasing colors, but Canon’s output is a bit warmer and richer, while Sony favors neutral tones.
Genre-by-Genre Performance: Which Camera Suits Your Passion?
Let’s break performance down further by photography types.
Genre | Canon 550D Strengths | Sony A500 Strengths |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Higher resolution and color depth | Good face detection, cleaner high ISO |
Landscape | High resolution and dynamic range | Good dynamic range, larger sensor area |
Wildlife | Decent burst, precise AF (but no tracking) | Higher frame rate, slightly larger sensor |
Sports | Reliable AF, limited burst | Faster burst (5 fps) helps action shots |
Street | Compact, lighter, good low light color | Tilting screen aids compose at awkward angles |
Macro | Sharp sensor detail | Image stabilization in body benefits macro |
Night/Astro | Good ISO control, manual exposure modes | Higher max ISO and cleaner noise control |
Video | 1080p Full HD, external mic port | No video recording capability |
Travel | Compact, lighter, better battery cycle | Versatile lens choices in Alpha mount |
Professional Work | RAW capture, solid color profiles | RAW capture, sensor-based stabilization |
Video Shooting: Can They Keep Up?
This is a key area where the Canon 550D clearly outperforms the Sony A500.
- Canon 550D: Shoots Full HD 1080p video at 30/25/24fps with H.264 compression. Offers external microphone input for improved audio, manual exposure control during video, and high frame rate 720p modes.
- Sony A500: Does not support video recording, making it unsuitable for videographers.
If video content creation is in your plans, the Canon 550D is the better option by far.
Battery Life & Storage: Power to Shoot All Day
Feature | Canon 550D | Sony A500 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | LP-E8 Li-ion | NP-FM500H Li-ion |
Battery Life (CIPA) | Approx 470 shots | Approx 520 shots |
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (single slot) | SD/SDHC + Memory Stick (single slot) |
Sony slightly edges Canon in battery endurance, an advantage for extended shoots or travel days. Both accept common SD memory cards, but Sony’s compatibility with Memory Stick adds flexibility if you already have legacy cards.
Connectivity: Plug In or Wirelessly Share?
Features | Canon 550D | Sony A500 |
---|---|---|
Wi-Fi | Eye-Fi Compatible | None |
Bluetooth/NFC | No | No |
HDMI | Yes | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
GPS | No | No |
Canon’s Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility offers basic wireless photo transfer, a feature absent on Sony. Both have HDMI output for previewing on TVs or monitors.
Lens Ecosystem & Accessory Support: Growing Your Gear Investment
- Canon 550D: Compatible with wide range of Canon EF and EF-S lenses - 326 lenses available at launch and growing, from affordable kit lenses to professional L series glass, plus third-party options.
- Sony A500: Fits Sony Alpha and legacy Minolta α-mount lenses – 143 lenses at release date, fewer than Canon, but with quality glass available.
Canon’s lens ecosystem is larger and more diverse, making it easier to find lenses suited to your genre and budget.
Summing Up: Which DSLR Wins in 2024?
Both cameras remain solid entry-level DSLRs even years after release, but their differences guide their ideal use cases.
Criterion | Winner | Notes |
---|---|---|
Image Resolution | Canon 550D | 18MP vs 12MP |
Low Light ISO | Sony A500 | Up to ISO 12800 |
Video Capability | Canon 550D | 1080p video + external mic input |
Burst Speed | Sony A500 | 5fps vs 4fps |
Portability | Canon 550D | Smaller and lighter |
Lens Selection | Canon 550D | Larger ecosystem |
User Interface | Canon 550D | Higher res rear screen |
Flash Features | Sony A500 | More creative control |
What’s Right For You?
Should You Choose the Canon 550D?
- You want versatile DSLR for photography and video.
- Prioritize higher resolution and better image detail.
- Need good color reproduction for portraits and landscapes.
- Desire a lighter camera for travel or street work.
- Value a large, comprehensive lens ecosystem.
- Looking for great tutorial resources – Canon gear is widespread.
Should You Choose the Sony A500?
- You want slightly faster burst rates for action and wildlife.
- Require better low light performance with less noise.
- Appreciate the tilting LCD for creative composition.
- Prefer sensor-based image stabilization (built-in).
- Don’t need video and prioritize stills first.
- Already invested in Sony/Minolta Alpha lenses.
Final Thoughts & Getting Hands-On
Real-world photography is about more than specs. Ergonomics, personal preference, and how a camera feels in your hands influence your creative output. Both the Canon 550D and Sony A500 continue to be viable options in budget-friendly DSLR selection, capable of delivering impressive images and serving enthusiastic beginners through to committed hobbyists.
Remember, investing in good lenses and mastering shooting techniques often impacts image quality more than body upgrades alone. We encourage you to handle these cameras in person, check for deals that include desirable lenses or accessories, and find the right fit for your creative journey.
Thank you for exploring this deep dive into two classic entry-level DSLRs. Your next masterpiece awaits - happy shooting!
Summary Table: Essential Specs Overview
Feature | Canon 550D | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | April 2010 | August 2009 |
Sensor | APS-C 18MP CMOS | APS-C 12.3MP CMOS |
Max ISO | 6400 (boosted 12800) | 12800 |
Continuous Shooting | 4 fps | 5 fps |
Video | 1080p Full HD | None |
Screen | 3" fixed, 1040k dots | 3" tilting, 230k dots |
Battery Life | ~470 shots | ~520 shots |
Weight | 530 g | 630 g |
Price (at release) | $599 | $638 |
We hope this detailed comparison supports your informed decision-making. Feel free to explore official tutorials, user galleries, and local rentals for a hands-on feel. Your photographic adventure deserves the right tool - pick wisely and create boldly!
Keep Shooting!
Canon 550D vs Sony A500 Specifications
Canon EOS 550D | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Sony |
Model | Canon EOS 550D | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 |
Also referred to as | EOS Rebel T2i / EOS Kiss X4 | - |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-04-01 | 2009-08-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4272 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 326 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color liquid-crystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 530 gr (1.17 lbs) | 630 gr (1.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 129 x 98 x 62mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 2.4") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 66 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.0 | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | 807 | 772 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | 520 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E8 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $638 |