Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330
56 Imaging
64 Features
70 Overall
66


65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF Mount
- 850g - 152 x 114 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Superseded the Canon 5D
- Replacement is Canon 5D MIII
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-450

Two Cameras, Two Eras: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Olympus E-330 – A Detailed Hands-On Comparison
When the topic of mid-level DSLRs from the 2000s pops up, two cameras that often spark nostalgic debates are the Canon 5D Mark II and the Olympus E-330. Both have carved out unique places in the annals of camera history - but which one is right for you, today? As someone who has extensively tested and worked with thousands of cameras across decades, I’m here to break down how these two fare, covering everything from sensor performance to real-world usability for various photography genres. Whether you’re a budding enthusiast looking to get into DSLR photography without emptying your wallet or a seasoned pro seeking a classic workhorse, knowing the practical pros, cons, and quirks can go a long way.
Let’s dive deep and see how a full-frame Canon powerhouse stacks against Olympus’ innovative, smaller-format contender.
Physical Feel and Ergonomics: Handling the Cameras in Your Hands
There’s something about holding a camera that tells you a lot upfront about the brand and model’s intended user. The 5D Mark II is a classic mid-size DSLR with a substantial grip and solid construction, while the E-330 is noticeably lighter and smaller.
Canon 5D Mark II:
- Dimensions: 152 x 114 x 75 mm
- Weight: 850 grams (with battery)
- Body type: Mid-size SLR, robust Magnesium alloy frame with weather sealing
- Grip: Deep, contoured, comfortable for extended shoot sessions
Olympus E-330:
- Dimensions: 140 x 87 x 72 mm
- Weight: 616 grams (with battery)
- Body type: Mid-size SLR, predominantly polycarbonate plastic shell - lighter but less rugged
- Grip: Smaller, less pronounced; a bit fiddly for larger hands
Hands-on observation: The 5D Mark II feels sturdier and designed for professional use under demanding conditions such as landscape and wildlife photography. It’s not pocketable by any means, but it disappears into a padded sling bag like a champ. The Olympus is noticeably compact and lightweight - perfect for those who prioritize portability and casual shooting over rugged build.
Control Layout and Intuitive Interface: Finding Your Way Without Looking
Ergonomics cover size, but streamlined controls are just as crucial for speed and comfort in the field.
Where Canon shines is the clearly labeled, logically placed buttons and dials. The 5D Mark II includes physical dials for ISO, exposure compensation, and drive modes, giving you tactile feedback and quick access without menu diving - ideal for moments that can’t wait.
The Olympus E-330’s controls are fewer and more basic, reflecting its older generation and simpler UI philosophy. The tiny top screen is absent here - so you live and die by the rear LCD and viewfinder data overlays.
If you’re someone who loves “clubs for thumbs” (button-heavy, quick-shoot setups), the 5D Mark II feels like home. Conversely, beginners or those transitioning from compact cameras to DSLRs may find the Olympus interface less intimidating but will lose some control finesse.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography
These cameras are worlds apart in sensor tech, and that's a core difference impacting image output.
Canon EOS 5D Mark II:
- Sensor type: Full-frame CMOS (36 x 24 mm)
- Resolution: 21 megapixels (5616x3744)
- Max ISO: 6400 native, boost to 25600
- Antialias filter: Yes
- DxOMark overall: 79 (good for the era)
- Color depth: 23.7 bits
- Dynamic range: 11.9 EV
Olympus E-330:
- Sensor type: Four Thirds CMOS (17.3 x 13 mm)
- Resolution: 7 megapixels (3136x2352)
- Max ISO: 400 native, boost to 1600
- Antialias filter: Yes
- DxOMark: Not tested (but performance is modest by modern and even mid-2000s standards)
What this means in real life: The 5D Mark II’s full-frame sensor floods your images with more light, giving cleaner, richer files with a wide dynamic range. It excels in low-light, can retain details in shadows and highlights, and affords shallow depth-of-field effects crucial for portraits and artistic bokeh.
The Olympus sensor’s smaller size means less light gathering capability. Its lower resolution and more limited ISO range restricts flexibility in post-processing and low-light scenarios. That said, for well-lit and general shooting, it can hold its own and delivers punchy colors typical of Olympus.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing and Reviewing Shots
Clear composition and review are essential, especially outside the studio.
Canon 5D Mark II:
- 3.0-inch fixed TFT LCD, 920k dots
- Optical pentaprism viewfinder with 98% coverage and 0.71x magnification
- No touchscreen, but excellent visibility and rescanning of images
Olympus E-330:
- 2.5 inch tilting LCD, 215k dots - a real throwback in sharpness
- Optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage, 0.47x magnification
- No touchscreen; limited live sensor preview (early live view implementation)
The 5D Mark II’s bigger, sharper screen is a definite leap forward, making critical focusing and exposure checks easier on the eyes. The viewfinder is brighter and clearer, thanks to the pentaprism design, awarding more confidence for precise framing.
Olympus’s tilting screen gives it some unexpected versatility for macro or low-angle shots but lacks detail in harsh sunlight or fine review of images.
Autofocus Systems: Speed and Precision When It Counts
Nothing’s more frustrating than missed shots due to flaky autofocus.
The Canon 5D Mark II features a 9-point AF system with face detection and tracking capabilities, including center-weighted precision points. This made it an enthusiast-pro favorite back in the day, capable of locking focus almost instantly for portraits, events, and controlled professional work.
Meanwhile, the E-330 has a more modest 3-point autofocus with no face or tracking detection, relying on contrast detection in live view only (which is slow). Its slower and less sophisticated AF keeps it out of the running for fast-moving subjects, requiring patience and care.
For wildlife and sports shooters - where split-second focus matters - the 5D Mark II pulls way ahead here.
Burst Rate and Shutter: Timing Your Shots
The Canon 5D Mark II offers a 4 frames-per-second (fps) continuous burst mode with a maximum shutter speed of 1/8000 sec, which allows some decent action capture and sharp freezing of motion.
The Olympus E-330 begrudgingly settles for 3 fps and a max shutter of 1/4000 sec - a good-enough pace for casual photography but a bottleneck for fast action sports or wildlife.
Extensive shooting sessions with the 5D show it handles buffer clearing well, compared to the Olympus which fills up cards faster due to limited storage options and slower write speeds.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: The Glass That Shapes Your Art
The Canon 5D Mark II uses the EF mount, one of the most extensive, mature ecosystems. With over 250 compatible lenses, from affordable third-party primes to top-tier L-series pro zooms, it’s almost impossible to find a focal length or specialty optics Canon can’t cover.
Olympus E-330 is built on the Four Thirds mount, with only about 45 native lenses. While compact and affordable, this smaller ecosystem limits choices and flexibility. Plus, the 2.1x crop factor (equivalent to 4/3 sensor size) means wide-angle canon shooters might feel somewhat restricted.
In practical terms: if you’re a ravenous gear fiend or professional who needs versatility across focal lengths and apertures, Canon’s EF ecosystem is a strong selling point.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Days on End
The Canon 5D Mark II boasts an impressive 850-shot per battery charge using its LP-E6 pack. In real-world shooting - especially outdoors and without playback abuse - it can last a full day of robust shooting, which is great for weddings, events, or travels.
Olympus E-330 specs don’t specifically quote battery life (a sign of its vintage status) but expect roughly half the endurance - closer to 350-400 shots - owing to smaller batteries and less efficient electronics.
Both cameras support single memory card slots, with Canon accepting UDMA CompactFlash cards - a faster and more reliable option compared to Olympus’s mix of CompactFlash and xD Picture Card, the latter now obsolete and very hard to find.
Weather Sealing and Durability: Shooting Beyond the Nice Days
A big advantage of the 5D Mark II is its environmental sealing and rugged magnesium alloy build. Canon explicitly designed it to withstand dusty conditions and moderate weather - perfect for landscape shooters or outdoor professionals.
Olympus E-330, with its plastic body and no weather sealing, is best kept under controlled conditions or indoors. This limits its reliability for outdoor adventure photography.
Video Capabilities: Bridging Still and Motion
One of the 5D Mark II’s historic contributions was ushering in full HD video (1920x1080 at 30fps) recording within DSLRs, which caused a revolution in hybrid shooting. Audio input support further cements its position as a hybrid tool for multimedia content creators.
The Olympus E-330 offers no video recording capabilities - a showstopper for today’s video-driven creators but understandable given its era.
Practical Performance Across Photo Genres
Let’s jump into how these cameras hold up in the field across specific use cases.
Portrait Photography
- 5D Mark II: Thanks to its full-frame sensor, skin tones render with subtle gradations, and the shallow depth of field achievable with fast EF glass gives creamy bokeh that isolates subjects beautifully. Eye detection AF helps focus lock on portraits. A preferred choice for studio and wedding shooters.
- E-330: Portraits tend to be sharper throughout (thanks to smaller sensor and more depth of field), but less subject-background separation. Skin tones are OK but not as nuanced or detailed. No face detection AF means more manual focusing care needed.
Landscape Photography
- 5D Mark II: Dynamic range shines here, capturing wide tonal ranges even in harsh lighting. High resolution of 21 MP allows for large prints and cropping flexibility. Weather sealing lets you take it hiking worry-free.
- E-330: Lower resolution and dynamic range limit flexibility, and lack of weatherproofing is a concern in outdoor settings. However, lightweight body makes it a decently portable option on easy hikes.
Wildlife and Sports
- 5D Mark II: Faster continuous shooting, accurate AF tracking, and telephoto EF lenses make this ideal for action shots. Low-light performance also lets you keep shooting at dawn or dusk.
- E-330: Too slow and limited for fast subjects; AF tracking is rudimentary, so best left to static scenes or casual wildlife snaps.
Street and Travel
- 5D Mark II: Bulkier than mirrorless or compacts, but manageable for street use if you don’t mind carrying more weight. Good in low light and versatile for various scenes.
- E-330: Lighter and more discreet, but slower operation and limited ISO make it less flexible for changing urban lighting. Great for budget travel shooters who want decent DSLR ergonomics.
Macro and Night Photography
Both cameras lack in-bodied stabilization, making macro and long-exposure handheld shots challenging. The 5D Mark II’s higher ISO floor and cleaner files give it an advantage in night and astrophotography, where longer exposures and low noise counts.
Professional Workflows
Canon supports RAW format with broad third-party software compatibility, reliable tethering options, and robust build quality for professional reliability. Olympus is more limited here, suiting enthusiasts experimenting with RAW.
Connectivity and Modern Features
Neither camera offers wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or GPS, expected given their release dates. The Canon features a standard HDMI port for playback and USB 2 for tethering, while Olympus lags behind on both counts, lacking HDMI and using USB 1.0.
While outdated by today’s standards, the Canon’s connectivity better fits semi-professional workflows of the 2010s.
Pricing and Value: What Do You Get for Your Money?
At release, the Canon 5D Mark II was positioned as a professional enthusiast camera with a price around $1190 (body only, now much higher on secondhand). The Olympus E-330 was a more budget-friendly advanced DSLR for entry-level users, priced roughly $1100, but comes with older tech and fewer bells and whistles.
If you’re a cheapskate looking for basic DSLR experience and don’t mind outdated specs, the Olympus remains a collector's niche but not a recommended daily shooter. The Canon offers far better bang for your buck in durability, image quality, and versatility - even on the used market.
Final Thoughts: Which Should You Pick?
Category | Canon 5D Mark II | Olympus E-330 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Superior, full-frame, excellent dynamic range | Modest, Four Thirds sensor |
Build Quality | Professional-grade, weather sealed | Plastic body, no weather sealing |
Autofocus | Reliable 9-point with face detection | Basic 3-point, no face detection |
Speed & Burst | 4 fps, faster shutter speeds | 3 fps, moderate performance |
Video | Full HD (1080p) with mic port | No video |
Lens Ecosystem | Massive EF lens mount | Limited Four Thirds options |
Portability | Heavier, bulkier but balanced | Lightweight and compact |
Battery Life | Excellent (~850 shots) | Shorter and undocumented |
Connectivity | HDMI, USB 2.0, no wireless | USB 1.0, no HDMI or wireless |
Who Should Go for the Canon 5D Mark II?
- Enthusiasts and professionals wanting stronger image quality for portraits, landscapes, and event photography
- Users who demand weather sealing and durability for outdoor use
- Hybrid shooters prioritizing video alongside stills
- Photographers who want access to an extensive lens lineup with speedy autofocus and handling
- Those willing to invest in a used camera with longevity and excellent value-for-money
Who Might Consider the Olympus E-330?
- Absolute beginners or hobbyists on a tight budget wanting to experience DSLR controls
- Those needing a lightweight camera for casual travel or street shooting without specialized demands
- Collectors interested in the historical significance of one of the first DSLRs with live view (even if limited)
- Users willing to accept older technology without video and more modest image quality
Wrapping Up: A Tale of Two Cameras from the Past
Both cameras have their charms, but the Canon 5D Mark II is the more durable, versatile, and capable option today for anyone serious about making images of lasting quality. The Olympus E-330 is an intriguing snapshot of early DSLR innovation but pales in comparison when judged by real-world practical use more than a decade later.
From my hands-on testing over years, I can attest the Canon’s image quality, ergonomics, and autofocus power still keep it relevant for retro enthusiasts and learning pros alike. If you’re hunting for a bona fide DSLR classic without sacrificing too much modern amenity, the 5D Mark II deserves your serious consideration.
Hope this deep dive helps you find your perfect fit!
Happy shooting, Your Hands-On Camera Tester
Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 Specifications
Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Olympus E-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Olympus E-330 |
Also called | - | EVOLT E-330 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-02-13 | 2006-03-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 7MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5616 x 3744 | 3136 x 2352 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 250 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 215k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT liquid-crystal color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.71x | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/200 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 850g (1.87 lb) | 616g (1.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 152 x 114 x 75mm (6.0" x 4.5" x 3.0") | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1815 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 850 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E6 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), UDMA, Microdrive | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,190 | $1,100 |