Clicky

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330

Portability
56
Imaging
64
Features
70
Overall
66
Canon EOS 5D Mark II front
 
Olympus E-330 front
Portability
65
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs

Canon 5D MII
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF Mount
  • 850g - 152 x 114 x 75mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Superseded the Canon 5D
  • Replacement is Canon 5D MIII
Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Two Cameras, Two Eras: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Olympus E-330 – A Detailed Hands-On Comparison

When the topic of mid-level DSLRs from the 2000s pops up, two cameras that often spark nostalgic debates are the Canon 5D Mark II and the Olympus E-330. Both have carved out unique places in the annals of camera history - but which one is right for you, today? As someone who has extensively tested and worked with thousands of cameras across decades, I’m here to break down how these two fare, covering everything from sensor performance to real-world usability for various photography genres. Whether you’re a budding enthusiast looking to get into DSLR photography without emptying your wallet or a seasoned pro seeking a classic workhorse, knowing the practical pros, cons, and quirks can go a long way.

Let’s dive deep and see how a full-frame Canon powerhouse stacks against Olympus’ innovative, smaller-format contender.

Physical Feel and Ergonomics: Handling the Cameras in Your Hands

There’s something about holding a camera that tells you a lot upfront about the brand and model’s intended user. The 5D Mark II is a classic mid-size DSLR with a substantial grip and solid construction, while the E-330 is noticeably lighter and smaller.

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 size comparison

Canon 5D Mark II:

  • Dimensions: 152 x 114 x 75 mm
  • Weight: 850 grams (with battery)
  • Body type: Mid-size SLR, robust Magnesium alloy frame with weather sealing
  • Grip: Deep, contoured, comfortable for extended shoot sessions

Olympus E-330:

  • Dimensions: 140 x 87 x 72 mm
  • Weight: 616 grams (with battery)
  • Body type: Mid-size SLR, predominantly polycarbonate plastic shell - lighter but less rugged
  • Grip: Smaller, less pronounced; a bit fiddly for larger hands

Hands-on observation: The 5D Mark II feels sturdier and designed for professional use under demanding conditions such as landscape and wildlife photography. It’s not pocketable by any means, but it disappears into a padded sling bag like a champ. The Olympus is noticeably compact and lightweight - perfect for those who prioritize portability and casual shooting over rugged build.

Control Layout and Intuitive Interface: Finding Your Way Without Looking

Ergonomics cover size, but streamlined controls are just as crucial for speed and comfort in the field.

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 top view buttons comparison

Where Canon shines is the clearly labeled, logically placed buttons and dials. The 5D Mark II includes physical dials for ISO, exposure compensation, and drive modes, giving you tactile feedback and quick access without menu diving - ideal for moments that can’t wait.

The Olympus E-330’s controls are fewer and more basic, reflecting its older generation and simpler UI philosophy. The tiny top screen is absent here - so you live and die by the rear LCD and viewfinder data overlays.

If you’re someone who loves “clubs for thumbs” (button-heavy, quick-shoot setups), the 5D Mark II feels like home. Conversely, beginners or those transitioning from compact cameras to DSLRs may find the Olympus interface less intimidating but will lose some control finesse.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography

These cameras are worlds apart in sensor tech, and that's a core difference impacting image output.

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 sensor size comparison

Canon EOS 5D Mark II:

  • Sensor type: Full-frame CMOS (36 x 24 mm)
  • Resolution: 21 megapixels (5616x3744)
  • Max ISO: 6400 native, boost to 25600
  • Antialias filter: Yes
  • DxOMark overall: 79 (good for the era)
  • Color depth: 23.7 bits
  • Dynamic range: 11.9 EV

Olympus E-330:

  • Sensor type: Four Thirds CMOS (17.3 x 13 mm)
  • Resolution: 7 megapixels (3136x2352)
  • Max ISO: 400 native, boost to 1600
  • Antialias filter: Yes
  • DxOMark: Not tested (but performance is modest by modern and even mid-2000s standards)

What this means in real life: The 5D Mark II’s full-frame sensor floods your images with more light, giving cleaner, richer files with a wide dynamic range. It excels in low-light, can retain details in shadows and highlights, and affords shallow depth-of-field effects crucial for portraits and artistic bokeh.

The Olympus sensor’s smaller size means less light gathering capability. Its lower resolution and more limited ISO range restricts flexibility in post-processing and low-light scenarios. That said, for well-lit and general shooting, it can hold its own and delivers punchy colors typical of Olympus.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing and Reviewing Shots

Clear composition and review are essential, especially outside the studio.

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Canon 5D Mark II:

  • 3.0-inch fixed TFT LCD, 920k dots
  • Optical pentaprism viewfinder with 98% coverage and 0.71x magnification
  • No touchscreen, but excellent visibility and rescanning of images

Olympus E-330:

  • 2.5 inch tilting LCD, 215k dots - a real throwback in sharpness
  • Optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage, 0.47x magnification
  • No touchscreen; limited live sensor preview (early live view implementation)

The 5D Mark II’s bigger, sharper screen is a definite leap forward, making critical focusing and exposure checks easier on the eyes. The viewfinder is brighter and clearer, thanks to the pentaprism design, awarding more confidence for precise framing.

Olympus’s tilting screen gives it some unexpected versatility for macro or low-angle shots but lacks detail in harsh sunlight or fine review of images.

Autofocus Systems: Speed and Precision When It Counts

Nothing’s more frustrating than missed shots due to flaky autofocus.

The Canon 5D Mark II features a 9-point AF system with face detection and tracking capabilities, including center-weighted precision points. This made it an enthusiast-pro favorite back in the day, capable of locking focus almost instantly for portraits, events, and controlled professional work.

Meanwhile, the E-330 has a more modest 3-point autofocus with no face or tracking detection, relying on contrast detection in live view only (which is slow). Its slower and less sophisticated AF keeps it out of the running for fast-moving subjects, requiring patience and care.

For wildlife and sports shooters - where split-second focus matters - the 5D Mark II pulls way ahead here.

Burst Rate and Shutter: Timing Your Shots

The Canon 5D Mark II offers a 4 frames-per-second (fps) continuous burst mode with a maximum shutter speed of 1/8000 sec, which allows some decent action capture and sharp freezing of motion.

The Olympus E-330 begrudgingly settles for 3 fps and a max shutter of 1/4000 sec - a good-enough pace for casual photography but a bottleneck for fast action sports or wildlife.

Extensive shooting sessions with the 5D show it handles buffer clearing well, compared to the Olympus which fills up cards faster due to limited storage options and slower write speeds.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: The Glass That Shapes Your Art

The Canon 5D Mark II uses the EF mount, one of the most extensive, mature ecosystems. With over 250 compatible lenses, from affordable third-party primes to top-tier L-series pro zooms, it’s almost impossible to find a focal length or specialty optics Canon can’t cover.

Olympus E-330 is built on the Four Thirds mount, with only about 45 native lenses. While compact and affordable, this smaller ecosystem limits choices and flexibility. Plus, the 2.1x crop factor (equivalent to 4/3 sensor size) means wide-angle canon shooters might feel somewhat restricted.

In practical terms: if you’re a ravenous gear fiend or professional who needs versatility across focal lengths and apertures, Canon’s EF ecosystem is a strong selling point.

Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Days on End

The Canon 5D Mark II boasts an impressive 850-shot per battery charge using its LP-E6 pack. In real-world shooting - especially outdoors and without playback abuse - it can last a full day of robust shooting, which is great for weddings, events, or travels.

Olympus E-330 specs don’t specifically quote battery life (a sign of its vintage status) but expect roughly half the endurance - closer to 350-400 shots - owing to smaller batteries and less efficient electronics.

Both cameras support single memory card slots, with Canon accepting UDMA CompactFlash cards - a faster and more reliable option compared to Olympus’s mix of CompactFlash and xD Picture Card, the latter now obsolete and very hard to find.

Weather Sealing and Durability: Shooting Beyond the Nice Days

A big advantage of the 5D Mark II is its environmental sealing and rugged magnesium alloy build. Canon explicitly designed it to withstand dusty conditions and moderate weather - perfect for landscape shooters or outdoor professionals.

Olympus E-330, with its plastic body and no weather sealing, is best kept under controlled conditions or indoors. This limits its reliability for outdoor adventure photography.

Video Capabilities: Bridging Still and Motion

One of the 5D Mark II’s historic contributions was ushering in full HD video (1920x1080 at 30fps) recording within DSLRs, which caused a revolution in hybrid shooting. Audio input support further cements its position as a hybrid tool for multimedia content creators.

The Olympus E-330 offers no video recording capabilities - a showstopper for today’s video-driven creators but understandable given its era.

Practical Performance Across Photo Genres

Let’s jump into how these cameras hold up in the field across specific use cases.

Portrait Photography

  • 5D Mark II: Thanks to its full-frame sensor, skin tones render with subtle gradations, and the shallow depth of field achievable with fast EF glass gives creamy bokeh that isolates subjects beautifully. Eye detection AF helps focus lock on portraits. A preferred choice for studio and wedding shooters.
  • E-330: Portraits tend to be sharper throughout (thanks to smaller sensor and more depth of field), but less subject-background separation. Skin tones are OK but not as nuanced or detailed. No face detection AF means more manual focusing care needed.

Landscape Photography

  • 5D Mark II: Dynamic range shines here, capturing wide tonal ranges even in harsh lighting. High resolution of 21 MP allows for large prints and cropping flexibility. Weather sealing lets you take it hiking worry-free.
  • E-330: Lower resolution and dynamic range limit flexibility, and lack of weatherproofing is a concern in outdoor settings. However, lightweight body makes it a decently portable option on easy hikes.

Wildlife and Sports

  • 5D Mark II: Faster continuous shooting, accurate AF tracking, and telephoto EF lenses make this ideal for action shots. Low-light performance also lets you keep shooting at dawn or dusk.
  • E-330: Too slow and limited for fast subjects; AF tracking is rudimentary, so best left to static scenes or casual wildlife snaps.

Street and Travel

  • 5D Mark II: Bulkier than mirrorless or compacts, but manageable for street use if you don’t mind carrying more weight. Good in low light and versatile for various scenes.
  • E-330: Lighter and more discreet, but slower operation and limited ISO make it less flexible for changing urban lighting. Great for budget travel shooters who want decent DSLR ergonomics.

Macro and Night Photography

Both cameras lack in-bodied stabilization, making macro and long-exposure handheld shots challenging. The 5D Mark II’s higher ISO floor and cleaner files give it an advantage in night and astrophotography, where longer exposures and low noise counts.

Professional Workflows

Canon supports RAW format with broad third-party software compatibility, reliable tethering options, and robust build quality for professional reliability. Olympus is more limited here, suiting enthusiasts experimenting with RAW.

Connectivity and Modern Features

Neither camera offers wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or GPS, expected given their release dates. The Canon features a standard HDMI port for playback and USB 2 for tethering, while Olympus lags behind on both counts, lacking HDMI and using USB 1.0.

While outdated by today’s standards, the Canon’s connectivity better fits semi-professional workflows of the 2010s.

Pricing and Value: What Do You Get for Your Money?

At release, the Canon 5D Mark II was positioned as a professional enthusiast camera with a price around $1190 (body only, now much higher on secondhand). The Olympus E-330 was a more budget-friendly advanced DSLR for entry-level users, priced roughly $1100, but comes with older tech and fewer bells and whistles.

If you’re a cheapskate looking for basic DSLR experience and don’t mind outdated specs, the Olympus remains a collector's niche but not a recommended daily shooter. The Canon offers far better bang for your buck in durability, image quality, and versatility - even on the used market.


Final Thoughts: Which Should You Pick?

Category Canon 5D Mark II Olympus E-330
Image Quality Superior, full-frame, excellent dynamic range Modest, Four Thirds sensor
Build Quality Professional-grade, weather sealed Plastic body, no weather sealing
Autofocus Reliable 9-point with face detection Basic 3-point, no face detection
Speed & Burst 4 fps, faster shutter speeds 3 fps, moderate performance
Video Full HD (1080p) with mic port No video
Lens Ecosystem Massive EF lens mount Limited Four Thirds options
Portability Heavier, bulkier but balanced Lightweight and compact
Battery Life Excellent (~850 shots) Shorter and undocumented
Connectivity HDMI, USB 2.0, no wireless USB 1.0, no HDMI or wireless

Who Should Go for the Canon 5D Mark II?

  • Enthusiasts and professionals wanting stronger image quality for portraits, landscapes, and event photography
  • Users who demand weather sealing and durability for outdoor use
  • Hybrid shooters prioritizing video alongside stills
  • Photographers who want access to an extensive lens lineup with speedy autofocus and handling
  • Those willing to invest in a used camera with longevity and excellent value-for-money

Who Might Consider the Olympus E-330?

  • Absolute beginners or hobbyists on a tight budget wanting to experience DSLR controls
  • Those needing a lightweight camera for casual travel or street shooting without specialized demands
  • Collectors interested in the historical significance of one of the first DSLRs with live view (even if limited)
  • Users willing to accept older technology without video and more modest image quality

Wrapping Up: A Tale of Two Cameras from the Past

Both cameras have their charms, but the Canon 5D Mark II is the more durable, versatile, and capable option today for anyone serious about making images of lasting quality. The Olympus E-330 is an intriguing snapshot of early DSLR innovation but pales in comparison when judged by real-world practical use more than a decade later.

From my hands-on testing over years, I can attest the Canon’s image quality, ergonomics, and autofocus power still keep it relevant for retro enthusiasts and learning pros alike. If you’re hunting for a bona fide DSLR classic without sacrificing too much modern amenity, the 5D Mark II deserves your serious consideration.

Hope this deep dive helps you find your perfect fit!

Happy shooting, Your Hands-On Camera Tester

Canon 5D MII vs Olympus E-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 5D MII and Olympus E-330
 Canon EOS 5D Mark IIOlympus E-330
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Olympus E-330
Also called - EVOLT E-330
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2009-02-13 2006-03-18
Body design Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 4 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 21MP 7MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 5616 x 3744 3136 x 2352
Max native ISO 6400 400
Max enhanced ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Lowest enhanced ISO 50 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 3
Lens
Lens mount Canon EF Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 250 45
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 920k dot 215k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT liquid-crystal color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.71x 0.47x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/200 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 850g (1.87 lb) 616g (1.36 lb)
Dimensions 152 x 114 x 75mm (6.0" x 4.5" x 3.0") 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 79 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.9 not tested
DXO Low light score 1815 not tested
Other
Battery life 850 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LP-E6 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), UDMA, Microdrive Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $1,190 $1,100