Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93
55 Imaging
67 Features
74 Overall
69
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 22MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF Mount
- 950g - 152 x 116 x 76mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Replaced the Canon 5D MII
- Renewed by Canon 5D MIV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched April 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the 5D MIII (22MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the 5D MIII (Full frame) and ST93 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 5D MIII was launched 14 months after the ST93 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon 5D MIII being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the 5D MIII scores versus the ST93 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Samsung ST93. The complete galleries are available at Canon 5D MIII Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 5D MIII over the Samsung ST93
| 5D MIII | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 | April 2011 | Newer by 14 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Canon 5D MIII
| ST93 | 5D MIII |
|---|
Common features in the Canon 5D MIII and Samsung ST93
| 5D MIII | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon 5D MIII enjoys exterior measurements of 152mm x 116mm x 76mm (6.0" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the 5D MIII against the ST93.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 5D MIII and ST93 is 55 and 97 respectively.
Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The image below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 5D MIII and ST93.
As you can tell, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 5D MIII because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon 5D MIII will render extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger 5D MIII will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon 5D MIII vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Samsung ST93 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 22MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Full resolution | 5760 x 3840 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 50 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 61 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 41 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | () |
| Total lenses | 250 | - |
| Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Clear View II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.71x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 152 x 116 x 76mm (6.0" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 81 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 2293 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 950 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E6 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash Type I (UDMA compatible), SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Pricing at launch | $2,780 | - |