Canon 5DS R vs FujiFilm JV200
55 Imaging
75 Features
73 Overall
74


96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
Canon 5DS R vs FujiFilm JV200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF Mount
- 930g - 152 x 116 x 76mm
- Launched February 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix JV205

Canon 5DS R vs. FujiFilm JV200: A Deep Dive into Two Cameras Worlds Apart
In the vast landscape of cameras, it's rare that we pit two models as dramatically different as the Canon EOS 5DS R and the FujiFilm FinePix JV200 head-to-head. Yet, this comparison reveals fascinating insights about how camera technology and user needs shape designs, capabilities, and ultimately photographic possibilities. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras over 15+ years, I invite you on a detailed journey through these two vastly different photographic tools, exploring their strengths, limitations, and who might benefit most from each.
Let’s begin by laying them side by side - quite literally.
Walking Through Design and Ergonomics: DSLR Bulk Versus Compact Convenience
Comparing the Canon 5DS R's mid-sized DSLR form factor to the Fuji JV200’s tiny compact body is like comparing a heavyweight with a featherweight. The 5DS R, at 930 grams and measuring 152x116x76mm, sits firmly in the hand with substantial heft and robust grip. It exudes a professional aura - durable magnesium alloy construction wrapped in weather sealing means it’s ready for tough fieldwork.
In contrast, the Fuji JV200 is a featherlight 125 grams with a slim 94x56x21mm body. Perfect for slipping into a jacket pocket or handbag, it’s the quintessential grab-and-go camera. However, it lacks weather sealing and the tactile controls that serious photographers appreciate.
The top control layout further illustrates their divergent philosophies:
The Canon’s top plate is garnished with dedicated dials and buttons - shutter speed, exposure compensation, ISO, and a top LCD for quick reference - designed for efficient handling in active shooting environments. The Fuji’s controls are minimalist, catering to simple point-and-shoot operation with limited manual input.
For anyone who values direct tactile interaction with settings, the Canon clearly takes the win. However, casual shooters looking for pocketable convenience might prefer the Fuji’s simplicity. Ergonomics here is a clear function of user intent.
The Heart of Image Quality: Sensor Technology and Raw Performance
To truly appreciate the image capabilities of these two cameras, we must scrutinize their sensors - arguably the most critical component defining photographic quality.
The Canon 5DS R boasts a 51.4-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor measuring 36x24mm (864mm²). Notably, this sensor is engineered without an optical low-pass filter (anti-aliasing filter), a design choice that maximizes resolution and sharpness - ideal for demanding studio, commercial, or landscape photography that benefits from pixel-level detail. The dual DIGIC 6 processors handle data throughput, supporting large image files without significant lag.
The Fuji JV200 is built around a tiny 1/2.3-inch (6.17x4.55mm or ~28mm²) CCD sensor with 14 megapixels - astoundingly small by today’s standards. This limitations naturally curb dynamic range, low-light sensitivity, and fine detail capture compared to the Canon beast. The fixed lens with 5.8x crop factor further reflects its role as a casual compact camera.
Dynamic range measured at 12.4 EV on the Canon translates into rich detail retention from shadows to highlights, essential in high contrast scenes like landscapes at dawn or architectural interiors. In contrast, compact cameras like the Fuji often struggle with limited latitude, compressing tonal gradations.
Color depth also dramatically favors Canon’s 24.6-bit rating compared to typical consumer compacts, enabling smoother gradations and richer hues - a boon for portrait skin tones and nuanced lighting.
So, from a technical standpoint, the Canon 5DS R is a jewel of image fidelity, delivering industry-leading resolution and dynamic latitude. The Fuji JV200 functions more as a casual snapshot device with limited capacity for fine art or professional applications.
Viewing, Interface, and User Experience: The Photographer’s Touchpoints
The user interface is critical in turning a camera’s capacity into actual photographs. Let’s compare how these cameras facilitate that connection.
The Canon offers a 3.2-inch fixed LCD with 1040k-dot resolution, providing sharp previews and straightforward menu navigation. While not a touchscreen, it supports live view with full autofocus capabilities. The presence of an optical pentaprism viewfinder covering 100% frame with 0.71x magnification is invaluable for working under bright light or for precise handheld composition. Buttons and dials are illuminated but not backlit, which demands some familiarity in low light.
Conversely, the Fuji has a smaller 2.7-inch LCD with modest 230k-dot resolution and no electronic viewfinder, pushing users to rely solely on the LCD for framing. The lack of touchscreen and minimal control options underline its simple design. Menus are sweeping for beginners but lack versatility for advanced tweaking.
If immersive viewing and controlled shooting environments appeal to you, the Canon clearly offers a richer tactile connection and interface precision. The Fuji prioritizes ease of use, lightweight construction, and straightforward operation.
Focus Capabilities under the Hood: Autofocus and Manual Control
In real-world shooting, autofocus (AF) speed, accuracy, and flexibility directly impact your ability to capture decisive moments, especially in fast-moving or intricate subjects.
The Canon 5DS R features a sophisticated 61-point AF system with 41 cross-type sensors, giving it excellent subject tracking capabilities during continuous shooting up to 5 fps. It excels with face detection in live view, enabling confident portrait work. Manual focus is fully supported - useful when precision is paramount in macro or studio scenarios.
For wildlife and sports shooting, the 5DS R’s AF performance is solid though not blazing; the relatively modest 5 fps frame rate and slightly slower AF compared to newer models might limit ultimate responsiveness in high-action scenarios. However, its large phase-detection AF array ensures reliability in most environments.
The Fuji JV200 provides contrast-detection AF with basic center-weighted focusing and single-point mode only - typical for compacts of its day. Continuous AF is slower and less accurate on moving subjects, limiting it to casual snapshots rather than action photography. Manual focus is not available.
Thus, from an AF perspective, Canon delivers professional-grade capability, essential for portraits, wildlife, sports, and macro, while Fuji suits simple everyday photography where speed and tracking are less critical.
Exploring Photography Genres: Strengths and Weaknesses
To contextualize these differences, let’s look at how both cameras fare across different photographic applications.
Portraits: Color, Skin Tones, and Bokeh
The 5DS R’s full-frame sensor excels at rendering smooth skin tones with impressionistic detail thanks to excellent color depth and dynamic range. Although it lacks in-body image stabilization (IBIS), paired with sharp Canon L-series lenses, it delivers creamy, controlled bokeh effects critical for subject isolation.
Eye detection AF enhances focus precision on faces, a benefit when working in aperture-priority or manual modes.
The Fuji JV200’s small sensor and lens limit shallow depth of field potential, making it difficult to produce creamy background blur. Color depth and dynamic range are modest, resulting in flatter skin tone rendition. The fixed lens’s max aperture F3.1 at the wide end is usable but less optimal in low light for portraits.
Landscapes: Resolution and Dynamic Range Dominance
The Canon’s 51MP resolution allows enormous image crops or ultra-large prints with extraordinary details - perfect for landscapes, architecture, or fine art. Weather sealing protects it from the elements during extended outdoor trips.
In contrast, the Fuji lacks the sensor size or resolution to capture fine texture, and its susceptibility to noise in shadows makes it less effective in variable lighting. No environmental sealing means caution in damp or dusty conditions.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Autofocus
While not a speed demon like dedicated sports DSLRs, the 5DS R offers reliable AF tracking and decent burst shooting for slower action or cautious wildlife photography.
The Fuji JV200’s slow AF and 1 fps shooting rate severely limit action capture, making it unsuitable for dynamic subjects.
Street and Travel: Discretion and Portability
Here, the Fuji shines - small, lightweight, and quietly unobtrusive, it invites spontaneous street photography and travel snapshots.
The Canon’s bulk and noise from its mirror slap make it less convenient for candid work, though its rugged build sustains rough handling.
Macro and Close-Up: Precision or Convenience?
The Canon enjoys compatibility with a vast Canon EF lens ecosystem, including top-tier macro optics offering high magnification and outstanding focus precision. Though lacking in-body stabilization, carefully paired lenses and tripods yield excellent detail.
The Fuji JV200’s fixed lens and lack of dedicated macro mode limit close-up performance to modest snaps.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Flexibility
Built on a full-frame sensor, the Canon 5DS R preserves usable detail at ISO 6400, with expanded ISO 12800 available though noise rises markedly. Its 30-second minimum shutter speed and manual exposure modes empower astrophotography and long exposures. The absence of IBIS means sturdy tripods and remote triggers are essential.
The Fuji’s small sensor struggles in low light, capped at ISO 1600 with higher noise and limited exposure control (top shutter speed 1/1400s minimum shutter 8s). Astro photography is not feasible beyond casual attempts.
Video Capabilities: 1080p Versus Basic HD
The Canon captures full HD 1080p video at 30 fps with microphone input for external audio - adequate for basic videography but falls short of cutting-edge 4K standards.
The Fuji JV200 records only 720p HD video with no external mic port, more of a mild bonus than serious video tool.
Battery Life and Storage: Spanning Days or Hours
The Canon 5DS R impresses with approximately 700 shots per charge using its LP-E6 pack - robust endurance for day-long shoots. It supports dual card slots (SD and CF), ideal for professional workflows requiring backup storage or overflow capacity.
The Fuji relies on disposable AA batteries, limiting sustainable shooting, with roughly 180 shots per set. A single SD slot with no backup is typical of its class.
Connectivity and Workflow: Professional Integration vs. Entry-Level
The Canon provides USB 3.0 and HDMI outputs but lacks wireless networking or GPS. For tethered studio work or fast file transfer, USB 3.0 offers speed but wireless would be welcome.
The Fuji JV200 is minimal - USB 2.0 only, no wireless or GPS.
Price-versus-Performance: Investment and Audience Alignment
As of launch, the Canon 5DS R commanded approximately $3700, firmly within professional or serious enthusiast budget territory - a significant but justified investment for ultra-high resolution art or commercial work.
The Fuji JV200 sat around $49 - ultra-budget friendly for casual consumers or beginners wanting a step beyond smartphones.
Here is a clear visual of overall performance ratings:
Who Should Consider Each Camera?
Photography enthusiasts and professionals who require the utmost image quality, fine detail, and control will find the Canon 5DS R an outstanding tool despite its age. Its ultra-high resolution sensor is a game-changer for studio, landscape, portrait, and commercial photography. However, its size, weight, and moderate AF speed may deter action-centric users.
Casual shooters, travel tourists, or first-time camera buyers looking for an affordable, pocketable companion will appreciate the Fuji JV200’s simplicity and convenience. It’s a great starter camera to learn basics or complement smartphone photography but lacks professional features or ultimate image quality.
In-Depth Genre Scores and Final Thoughts
Let’s look at the genre-specific scores derived from testing data:
These reinforce the obvious: Canon dominates in all serious photographic genres, while Fuji remains limited to casual snapshots.
Sample Images: A Tale of Two Cameras in the Field
To highlight tonal rendition, detail capture, and color science, here are side-by-side image samples from each camera under typical shooting conditions. The Canon’s files reveal rich textures and subtle tones, while the Fuji’s snapshots are serviceable but plainly limited in dynamic range and fine detail.
Concluding Advice: Making the Right Choice
In the crowded camera market, selection hinges critically on your photographic goals:
-
Choose Canon 5DS R if you prioritize top-tier image quality, large prints, extensive lens flexibility, and professional-level controls. Its limitations are size, weight, modest burst rate, and lack of in-body stabilization. Ideal for portrait, landscape, studio, and detail-focused work.
-
Opt for Fuji JV200 if you want a lightweight, pocket-friendly, no-fuss camera for casual use, travel, or first steps into digital photography. Its limitations preclude professional or advanced creative ambitions but make it highly accessible and affordable.
Final Tip: Testing Cameras Yourself
While my extensive lab and field testing offer comprehensive insights, nothing replaces hands-on experience. If possible, visit a camera store or rent these models to evaluate ergonomics, menu systems, and image output firsthand before investing.
Whether wielding a professional-grade DSLR or an everyday compact, the best camera is one that empowers your creative vision and fits your lifestyle.
I hope this detailed, experience-driven comparison has illuminated the distinct paths these two fascinating cameras occupy and helps you confidently select the ideal photographic partner.
Happy shooting!
End of Review
Canon 5DS R vs FujiFilm JV200 Specifications
Canon EOS 5DS R | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS 5DS R | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 |
Also called | - | FinePix JV205 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual DIGIC 6 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8688 x 5792 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 61 | - |
Cross type focus points | 41 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
Number of lenses | 250 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.2 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.71x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 930 grams (2.05 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 152 x 116 x 76mm (6.0" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 86 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 2308 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 700 images | 180 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | LP-E6 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible), CompactFlash | SD / SDHC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at release | $3,699 | $49 |