Clicky

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2013
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The TG-2 iHS was announced 14 months before the QX1 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-2 iHS scores vs the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony QX1

 TG-2 iHS QX1 
Display dimensions3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution610k0kClearer display (+610k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 QX1 TG-2 iHS 
IntroducedSeptember 2014June 2013Newer by 14 months
Manual focus Very exact focus
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX1

 TG-2 iHS QX1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the QX1.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and QX1 is 91 and 90 respectively.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and QX1.

Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony QX1 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
Sony QX1 Portrait photography advice
27
has face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
66
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography details
Sony QX1 Street photography details
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (216g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
Sports photography with Sony QX1
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (350 shots)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
56
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery life (440 per charge)
slow fps (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
Travel photography with Sony QX1
68
better than average battery (350 per charge)
environment proof
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
71
better than average battery life (440 shots)
comes with focus via touch
good megapixels (20MP)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (216g)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
Landscape photography with Sony QX1
46
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
better than average battery (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
64
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (440 shots)
small screen (")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging details
Sony QX1 Vlogging details
36
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic jack
32
built-in touchscreen
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
no external mic support
heavier than competition in class (216g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX1
 Olympus Tough TG-2 iHSSony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS Sony Alpha QX1
Class Waterproof Lens-style
Launched 2013-06-28 2014-09-03
Physical type Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 6400 16000
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.6
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch -
Resolution of display 610k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230 gr (0.51 lbs) 216 gr (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 440 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-90B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type - microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $380 $500