Clicky

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300

Portability
66
Imaging
67
Features
85
Overall
74
Canon EOS 77D front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Canon 77D
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 540g - 131 x 100 x 76mm
  • Released February 2017
  • Additionally referred to as EOS 9000D
  • Replaced the Canon T6s
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon 77D versus Olympus E-300, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 77D (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the 77D (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The 77D was introduced 12 years later than the E-300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the 77D grades vs the E-300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 77D over the Olympus E-300

 77D E-300 
RevealedFebruary 2017January 2005More recent by 148 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1040k134kSharper screen (+906k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Canon 77D

 E-300 77D 

Common features in the Canon 77D and Olympus E-300

 77D E-300 
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon 77D offers physical measurements of 131mm x 100mm x 76mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Olympus E-300 has sizing of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon 77D versus Olympus E-300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 77D vs the E-300.

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 77D and E-300 is 66 and 67 respectively.

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The visual underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 77D and E-300.

All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 77D having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Canon 77D will provide you with greater detail using its extra 16MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern 77D provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 77D Portrait photography information
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
80
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
48
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
low MP (8 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon 77D
Street photography with Olympus E-300
72
fully articulated screen
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
offers touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon 77D as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
66
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
sensor has phase detect AF
low frames per second (6.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon 77D Travel photography factors
Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
79
has bluetooth
offers touch focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
45
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low MP (8MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon 77D Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
77
manual focus
change lenses (Canon EF/EF-S mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (1.8")
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon 77D
Vlogging with Olympus E-300
73
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes mic socket
no image stabilization
9
no video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon 77D vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 77D and Olympus E-300
 Canon EOS 77DOlympus E-300
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS 77D Olympus E-300
Also called EOS 9000D EVOLT E-300
Type Entry-Level DSLR Advanced DSLR
Released 2017-02-15 2005-01-10
Physical type Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 7 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 8MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 6000 x 4000 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 25600 400
Highest enhanced ISO 51200 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 45 3
Cross focus points 45 -
Lens
Lens mount Canon EF/EF-S Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 326 45
Focal length multiplier 1.6 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 1.8 inches
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 134k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.51x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 6.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options - Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/200 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 540g (1.19 pounds) 624g (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 131 x 100 x 76mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 971 not tested
Other
Battery life 600 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $549 $800