Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520
66 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 540g - 131 x 100 x 76mm
- Revealed February 2017
- Alternate Name is EOS 9000D
- Succeeded the Canon T6s
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the 77D (24MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the 77D (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) use different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 77D was released 8 years later than the E-520 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon 77D being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the 77D grades vs the E-520 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS 77D & Olympus E-520. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon 77D Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 77D over the Olympus E-520
77D | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2017 | August 2008 | More recent by 104 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon 77D
E-520 | 77D |
---|
Common features in the Canon 77D and Olympus E-520
77D | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon 77D offers outside dimensions of 131mm x 100mm x 76mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has proportions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Check the Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the 77D and the E-520.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 77D and E-520 is 66 and 68 respectively.
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 77D and E-520.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 77D due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon 77D will give more detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer 77D should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon 77D vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
Canon EOS 77D | Olympus E-520 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS 77D | Olympus E-520 |
Alternate name | EOS 9000D | - |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2017-02-15 | 2008-08-20 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 45 | 3 |
Cross type focus points | 45 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF/EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 326 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.51x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 540 grams (1.19 lbs) | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) |
Dimensions | 131 x 100 x 76mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 971 | 548 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 600 pictures | 650 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $549 | $400 |