Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS
89 Imaging
59 Features
65 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4331b/4331bddef394cb666feca458be1c41d8a803dc10" alt="Canon EOS M front Canon EOS M front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7726/a77266e16c8e817031df1e9ec6e12ac4a12ca9c5" alt="Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Released July 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Canon M versus Canon SX200 IS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Canon. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the M (18MP) and SX200 IS (12MP) and the M (APS-C) and SX200 IS (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The M was launched 3 years after the SX200 IS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the M grades against the SX200 IS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M & Canon PowerShot SX200 IS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M Gallery & Canon SX200 IS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Canon SX200 IS
M | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 39 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Canon M
SX200 IS | M |
---|
Common features in the Canon M and Canon SX200 IS
M | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Canon SX200 IS has sizing of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M versus Canon SX200 IS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the M versus the SX200 IS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9b90/d9b90aa0ac7d808d58ebc4ba2a2d39592791cf6e" alt="Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS size comparison Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M and SX200 IS is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe56b/fe56bc599539b9d6477faaad257e1c5155d2265e" alt="Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS top view buttons comparison Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS top view buttons comparison"
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M and SX200 IS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon M will render greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern M should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a967/2a96717534204336a8939f547cca43616f03c37c" alt="Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS sensor size comparison Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS sensor size comparison"
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d330f/d330fe603a4231a5711340487cdba4691740ecfa" alt="Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon M vs Canon SX200 IS Specifications
Canon EOS M | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Canon |
Model | Canon EOS M | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-07-23 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 31 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-336mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.4-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 0cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Clear View II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 298 gr (0.66 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 827 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E12 | NB-5L |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $510 | $329 |