Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR
89 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed July 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Announced January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the M (18MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is very well matched but the M (APS-C) and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M was announced 6 months earlier than the Fujifilm F900EXR which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the M matches up vs the Fujifilm F900EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon M Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| M | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon M
| Fujifilm F900EXR | M |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M and Fujifilm F900EXR
| M | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2012 | January 2013 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon M provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Fujifilm F900EXR has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the M and the Fujifilm F900EXR.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M and Fujifilm F900EXR is 89 and 90 respectively.
Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M and Fujifilm F900EXR.
All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Canon M will resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively.
Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon M vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
| Canon EOS M | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon EOS M | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-07-23 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | EXR II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 31 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 23 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Clear View II TFT LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/200s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 298g (0.66 lb) | 232g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 827 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 260 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $510 | $380 |