Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220
89 Imaging
59 Features
65 Overall
61
![Canon EOS M front Canon EOS M front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Canon_EOS_M_0.jpg)
![Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Leica-M-E-Typ-220/Leica-M-E-Typ-220-front.jpg)
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched July 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Canon M and Leica M-E Typ 220, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Canon and Leica. The sensor resolution of the M (18MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) is very close but the M (APS-C) and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) offer different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The M was introduced about the same time to the M-E Typ 220 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M matches up versus the M-E Typ 220 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M & Leica M-E Typ 220. The whole galleries are provided at Canon M Gallery & Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Leica M-E Typ 220
M | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Canon M
M-E Typ 220 | M |
---|
Common features in the Canon M and Leica M-E Typ 220
M | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | ![]() | September 2012 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon M provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Leica M-E Typ 220 has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check the Canon M and Leica M-E Typ 220 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the M vs the M-E Typ 220.
![Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 size comparison Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M-vs-Leica-M-E-Typ-220-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M and M-E Typ 220 is 89 and 79 respectively.
![Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 top view buttons comparison Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M-vs-Leica-M-E-Typ-220-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M and M-E Typ 220.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The M contains the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF more difficult.
![Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor size comparison Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-M-vs-Leica-M-E-Typ-220-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M-vs-Leica-M-E-Typ-220-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon M vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications
Canon EOS M | Leica M-E Typ 220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Leica |
Model type | Canon EOS M | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-07-23 | 2012-09-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 5212 x 3472 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 2500 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 31 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Leica M |
Available lenses | 23 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Clear View II TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 298 gr (0.66 pounds) | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 65 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.1 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 827 | 787 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $510 | $0 |