Canon M vs Nikon Z fc
89 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
79 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched July 2012
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Increase to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 445g - 135 x 94 x 44mm
- Announced June 2021
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon M and Nikon Z fc, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the M (18MP) and the Z fc (21MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M was unveiled 10 years earlier than the Z fc and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon Z fc being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the M grades against the Z fc with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M & Nikon Z fc. The full galleries are available at Canon M Gallery & Nikon Z fc Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Nikon Z fc
| M | Z fc |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon Z fc over the Canon M
| Z fc | M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2021 | July 2012 | More recent by 108 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon M and Nikon Z fc
| M | Z fc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | The same display resolution | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon M enjoys outside measurements of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Nikon Z fc has dimensions of 135mm x 94mm x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Compare the Canon M and Nikon Z fc in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the M compared to the Z fc.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M and Z fc is 89 and 79 respectively.
Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M and Z fc.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon Z fc to deliver extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older M is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon M vs Nikon Z fc Specifications
| Canon EOS M | Nikon Z fc | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon EOS M | Nikon Z fc |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-07-23 | 2021-06-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 21 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 5568 x 3712 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 51200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 31 | 209 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Nikon Z |
| Number of lenses | 23 | 21 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Clear View II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/200 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 298 gr (0.66 lbs) | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 135 x 94 x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 827 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | EN-EL25 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $510 | $949 |