Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2
89 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
89 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced July 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Canon M versus Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the M (18MP) and the E-PM2 (16MP) is fairly close but the M (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M was released 10 months earlier than the E-PM2 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M scores versus the E-PM2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Olympus E-PM2
| M | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Canon M
| E-PM2 | M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2013 | July 2012 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Canon M and Olympus E-PM2
| M | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Canon M offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Canon M versus Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the M compared to the E-PM2.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M and E-PM2 is 89 and 89 respectively.
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M and E-PM2.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older M will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Canon EOS M | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon EOS M | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-07-23 | 2013-05-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 31 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Clear View II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 298g (0.66 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 65 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.1 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 827 | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 360 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $510 | $448 |