Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2
89 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced July 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Canon M versus Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the M (18MP) and the E-PM2 (16MP) is fairly close but the M (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M was released 10 months earlier than the E-PM2 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M scores versus the E-PM2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Olympus E-PM2
| M | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Canon M
| E-PM2 | M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2013 | July 2012 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Canon M and Olympus E-PM2
| M | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Canon M offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Canon M versus Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the M compared to the E-PM2.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M and E-PM2 is 89 and 89 respectively.
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M and E-PM2.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older M will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon M vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Canon EOS M | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon EOS M | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-07-23 | 2013-05-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 31 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Clear View II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 298g (0.66 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 65 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.1 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 827 | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 360 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $510 | $448 |